Apollo 13 A Successful Failure Essay Research

Apollo 13: A Successful Failure Essay, Research Paper

During a alteration of Oxygen Tank No. 2 by NASA contractor, North American Rockwell, it was unwittingly dropped about 2 inches, which caused undetected harm to the interior assemblies. This harm finally led the failure of the $ 400-million Apollo 13 mission.

The crew of Apollo 13 was responsible for several scientific experiments that were to be carried out during the mission. Atmospheric electrical phenomena experiments were designed to & # 8220 ; study certain facets of launch-phase electrical

phenomena. & # 8221 ; An chance to analyze big mass impact phenomena on the Moon was available with this mission. Alternatively of directing the 3rd phase of the launch vehicle into solar orbit, as had been done on old missions, the flight of the Apollo 13 S-IVB was designed to do it to hit the lunar surface. Equipment set up during the Apollo 12 mission would hold been used to enter the seismal signals. The crew was besides assigned to put in a heat flow experiment designed to mensurate the sum of heat coming from the interior of the Moon. This information would be used to find whether the Moon really had a molten nucleus. This would supply new penetration on the internal construction of the Moon.

The Apollo ballistic capsule ( CM ) was named Odyssey and the lunar faculty ( LM ) , Aquarius. The CM was a conelike force per unit area vas with a maximal diameter of 3.9 m at its base and a tallness of 3.65 m. The CM was divided into three compartments, frontward, aft, and the crew compartment. The forward compartment, in the olfactory organ of the cone, contained & # 8220 ; the three 25.4 m diameter chief parachutes, two 5 m drogue parachutes, and pilot howitzer chutes for Earth landing. & # 8221 ; The aft compartment, at around the base of the CM, & # 8220 ; contained propellent armored combat vehicles, reaction control engines, wiring, and plumbing. & # 8221 ; Most of the volume of the CM, about 6.17m, is in the crew compartment. The lunar faculty was a two-stage vehicle designed for infinite operations near and on the Moon. The LM was originally designed to back up two spacemans for 45 hours.

The crew Commander was 42-year-old Navy Captain James A. Lovell, Jr. Lovell & # 8217 ; s spouse on the Moon, the lunar faculty pilot, was Fred Haise, Jr. Assigned to stay in lunar orbit aboard Odyssey, the bid faculty pilot, Navy Lieutenant Commander Thomas K. Mattingly.

& # 8220 ; Five yearss before the launch day of the month of April 11th, it was discovered that a member of the backup crew, Air Force Major Charles M. Duke, Jr. , had come down with German measles ( German rubeolas ) . & # 8221 ; The premier crew was given blood trials to find if they had unsusceptibility. Lovell and Haise were cleared, but Mattingly was non. Having late been exposed to rubella and because it was likely that he could acquire ill in flight, he was replaced with 34-year-old John L Swigert, Jr. , who did hold unsusceptibility. A trial pilot, Swigert had a mechanical technology grade from the University of Colorado and a Maestro of Science grade in aerospace scientific discipline from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

The crew of Apollo 13 was boosted off Pad 39A of the Kennedy Space Center, right on clip, at 2:13p.m. , Easter Standard Time, Saturday, April 11, 1970. From the sounds, sights, and quivers given off by the Saturn 5, the most powerful projectile in the universe, everything seemed to be traveling swimmingly to the insouciant perceiver. However, this was non the instance. A series of minor defects appeared during powered flight up through the ambiance. Although non straight related, but precursors of the catastrophe to come two yearss subsequently as the crew approached the Moon.

During the fire of the Saturn 5 & # 8217 ; s 2nd phase, the centre engine in a bunch of five cut away 132 seconds early as a consequence of remarkably big oscillations in thrust chamber force per unit area. & # 8220 ; This caused the staying four engines to fire 34 seconds longer than planned. & # 8221 ; This would, hopefully, take the vehicle to the planned acceleration at 2nd phase cutoff. Even with this compensation, the speed was 223 pess per second lower than planned. Again, the counsel computing machine attempted to rectify this by doing the 3rd phase, the S4B, to fire it & # 8217 ; s individual engine 9 seconds longer than programmed.

& # 8220 ; Two hours and 35 proceedingss after launch, the crew fired the S4B a 2nd clip for a translunar injection. & # 8221 ; Once out of Earth orbit, Lovell performed a heterotaxy manoeuvre. He moved the bid faculty off from the S4B, turned it around, and docked nose first with the lunar faculty, still encapsulated in the forward subdivision of the S4B. Once the manoeuvre was complete and the Lunar Module was secured to the Apollo bid faculty, the crew activated springs that pushed the LM-Apollo stack off from the S4B. As the stack moved off from the S4B, accountants at Houston directed it to its predetermined lunar clang site. At this point, all was good and the crew went on as planned.

At 9 p.m. on April 13th, Mission Control asked the crew to turn over the ballistic capsule to the right about 60 grades and seek to snap a comet named Benntt was supposed to be seeable. They were besides asked to stir the liquid O and liquid H in the service faculty armored combat vehicles in order to guarantee proper provender to the fuel cell batteries, in which O and H were assorted to bring forth electricity and as a byproduct, H2O.

Then all of a sudden, Haise asked Houston to stand by a minute and so he said: & # 8220 ; Hey, we & # 8217 ; ve got a job here. & # 8221 ; There had been a chief coach B interval, significance, the amperage on the coach that distributed power to the ship had all of a sudden surged up and dropped back down.

The crew so reported that the chief coach A was demoing abnormally low electromotive force. A minute subsequently, it was discovered that liquid O Tank No. 2 providing the fuel cells power system was reading nothing. & # 8220 ; We are venting something out into infinite, & # 8221 ; Lovell said. & # 8220 ; It & # 8217 ; s a gas of some sort. & # 8221 ; It was O. The figure 2 armored combat vehicle had ruptured. Two of the ships three fuel cell batteries were dead, go forthing merely one on line, and this one was demoing marks of neglecting.

Houston instructed the crew to power down the ship every bit shortly as possible until the problem could be analyzed. In the interim, the ship had began to flip and turn over from the venting gas.

When it was to the full recognized, approximately 10:20 p.m. CST, on the 13th, Apollo 13 was 180,521 maritime stat mis from Earth, more so midway to the Moon. The ship had suffered a awful accident, the runaway of a liquid O armored combat vehicle in the service faculty behind the bid faculty. Because of this, it had lost most of its electric power. It was hopelessly crippled.

This meant that the crew would hold to utilize the electric power and life support system in the lunar faculty, now their lifeboat, to return to Earth. & # 8220 ; It was an unpleasant trip place ; the lunar faculty temperature was on T a few grades above freeze and H2O was rationed to merely six ounces per individual, per day. & # 8221 ; Originally designed to prolong 2 people for 45 hours, but by carefully conserving both power and air, three spacemans survived for over 95 hours.

There was still some power from O armored combat vehicle No. 1 providing one fuel cell, but that armored combat vehicle was leaking, seemingly damaged by the runaway of armored combat vehicle No. 2, and the power was melting. Merely the bid faculty storage batteries were left in Apollo, and these would hold to be used for reentry into Earth atmosphere. The lunar faculty was now the crew & # 8217 ; s lone redemption.

As the crew began traveling into the Aquarius and close

ting down the bid faculty, sailing masters at Mission Control computed a new class that would swing the ship around the Moon and convey it back to Earth. At 2:43 ante meridiem CST, April 14th the crew made the first class rectification. They had to fire the Lunar Modules engines for 30.7 seconds. This would increase the speed 38 pess per second, which put the ship in a free return flight that would cross the Indian Ocean, off the seashore of Africa in 90 hours and 30 proceedingss. That meant that splash down would be at 9:13p.m. , Houston clip, April 17th.

As they neared the Moon, Mission Control came up with a 2nd class rectification. They would fire the engines for an extra 263.4 seconds. This would increase the speed by 861 pess per second. This would cut 9 hours and 6 proceedingss off of the return clip and set splashdown in the mid-Pacific Ocean at 12:07 p.m. , Houston clip, April 17th. This made recovery easier since ships were already deployed in the Pacific.

This concluding class rectification was scheduled for 8:41 p.m. , April 14th. Apollo 13 rounded the Moon in its 77th hr of flight and headed back toward Earth at 7,064 pess per second.

At 12:07.41 p.m. CST, April 17th, in sight of the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, the Odyssey came through that ambiance and landed into the ocean below. It took less so an hr for the crew to be removed and flown back to the bearer by chopper.

The chief power system for the Apollo ballistic capsule was contained in Bay No. 4 of the service faculty. Power at 28 Vs, direct current, was supplied by three fuel cells. Oxygen was stored in a semiliquid province in two armored combat vehicles mounted following to each other on a shelf in Bay 4. Hydrogen, kept in the same province, was stored in two armored combat vehicles below the ego.

In zero gravitation, fluids don & # 8217 ; t flux really good unless pushed by something. The method used was to boil it to construct up the force per unit area in the armored combat vehicle. Each armored combat vehicle contained a warmer spiral, a thermostatic switch, and electric fans to stir up the mixture and advance even flow. & # 8220 ; The thermostatic switch was designed to open and close off the warming elements when the temperature reached 80? F. & # 8221 ;

Each armored combat vehicle held 326 lbs of O under force per unit area of 865 to 935 lbs per square inch. Although every armored combat vehicle had a broke force per unit area of 2200 lbs per square inch, and a alleviation valve that would dump O when the force per unit area reached 1000 lbs, these safety steps could non forestall an detonation from a rapid build-up of force per unit area if a fire was started in a armored combat vehicle.

The root of this accident can be traced back to 1966, when the Beech Aircraft Corp. manufactured Tank No. 2. Harmonizing to NASA, credence testing showed that heat was leaking into the armored combat vehicle at a higher rate than specifications permitted. After some reworking, the escape was reduced, but was still considered to be unacceptable by the bureau. & # 8220 ; The armored combat vehicle was eventually accepted after a formal release of this discrepancy. & # 8221 ; Several other disagreements that were regarded as child by infinite bureau inspectors were besides accepted, harmonizing to NASA. These included outsize holes in the armored combat vehicle dome and electrical stopper support and an outsize stud hole in the warmer assembly merely above the lower fan. None of these points was regarded every bit serious in 1966 and none had anything to make with the detonation 4 old ages subsequently. But they were diagnostic of a inclination toward inadvertence in which a more serious disagreement could happen, undetected.

After it was shipped to North America, Tank No. 2, consecutive figure 10024X-TA0009, was foremost installed in service faculty 106 for the flight of Apollo 10. However, Tank No. 2 was removed from this flight because of a determination by NASA to modify vacuum pump on the armored combat vehicle dome. The alteration required the remotion of the O armored combat vehicles and the shelf on which they were mounted in the Service Module. As Tank No. 2 was being removed, it was by chance dropped about 2 inches. Testing showed this accident caused no evident harm to the armored combat vehicle. After the vacuity pump alterations, the armored combat vehicle was installed in service faculty 109 for the flight of Apollo 13.

Several hebdomads before each Apollo launch at the Kennedy Space Center, a countdown presentation trial series is carried out to observe any jobs before the concluding countdown starts. During the presentation trial for Apollo 13, land crews reported a job in Tank No. 2. It could be filled usually, but could non be emptied in the normal manner, by pumping gaseous O into the vent line to force the liquid O out through the fill line. This worked absolutely for Tank No.1, but non for Tank No. 2.

Land crews thought there was a loose adjustment that allowed the gaseous O being pumped in the blowhole line to get away through the fill line with out forcing out much liquid O in the armored combat vehicle. Subsequently, the possibility that the adjustment had been loosened when the armored combat vehicle was dropped at North American months before was considered to be a possible cause of the job.

To empty the armored combat vehicles, the land crew turned on the warmers and fans to seek to boil the O from the armored combat vehicle. On March 27 and 28 the warmers and fans were turned on by using 65 Vs of direct current from the land power supply for extended periods of 6 to 8 hours at a clip.

Unknown to the land crew, this had set phase for the accident. The 65 Vs was far excessively much for the thermostatic switches that controlled the warmers. They were designed to run on 28 Vs from the ballistic capsule fuel cell generators. Although the switches would transport 65 Vs when closed, they would neglect in the closed place if they started to open to disrupt the burden. At one point, the switches did get down to open and were so welded shut during the long period when the warmers were runing with 65 Vs to boil the O out of the armored combat vehicle. The failure of the thermostatically controlled switches allowed temperatures in the warmer assembly to make 1000? F alternatively of closing the warmers off at 80? F.

The fact that the safety switches had been welded shut and hence were non runing could hold been detected at the Kennedy Space Center if person had been watching heater current readings on Tank No. 2. Detectors would hold shown that the warmers had exceeded that safety exchange temperature bound.

& # 8220 ; The design for the accident was eventually drawn by the Review Board. Because of a bump one twenty-four hours in the autumn of 1969, a adjustment might hold been loosened. Because of that, a armored combat vehicle could non be emptied decently. Because of that, a land crew applied the incorrect electromotive force to the armored combat vehicle warmers. Because of an unequal switch, overheating occurred, firing insularity off electrical wiring. Because of that, the wires finally abruptly circuited and a $ 400-million mission was aborted. & # 8221 ;

5cf

Compton, David. Apollo 13: A Successful Failure.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/Academy/History/Apollo-13/Mission-Report.html.

Davis, William. Apollo 13 Command and Service Module ( CSM ) .

hypertext transfer protocol: //nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/tmp/1970-029A.html

Dumoulin, Jim. Apollo-13. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.science.ksc.nasa.gov/history/apollo.html

Howard, Ron. Apollo 13. Cosmopolitan Pictures. 1995.

Lewis, Richard S. The Voyages of Apollo: The Exploration of the Moon. Toronto:

Fitzhenry & A ; Whiteside, Ltd. , 1974.

Neal, Valerie, Cathleen S. Lewis, and Frank H. Winter. Spaceflight. New York:

Macmillian, 1995.