Bison Calf Behaviors and Their Interactions with Mother Bison Essay Sample

Yellowstone National Park. a topographic point in which Birds fly free. Elk and Bison roam the vale. and the Bears and Wolves tie the nutrient concatenation together. The first animate being observed merely in the Gatess of Yellowstone National Park was a lone Bison ; instantly a point of involvement for the group. The Bison ( Bison bison ) is the largest land mammal in North America. and in a typical twelvemonth about 3. 000 Bison roam through the vales of Yellowstone National Park ( National Park Service. 2012 ) . Until the reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone. grownup Bison didn’t have any marauders. Observed first-hand. the Mollie Wolf Pack does in fact kill grownup Bison which will besides convey forth the motherly inherent aptitudes of Bison to protect their immature. In a survey conducted by Smith et Al. wolves were more successful in killing moose when they were foremost released into Yellowstone. but when the moose became scarce some of the wolf battalions learned how to kill injured Bison and Bison calves. and since have succeeded in killing any grownup or Bison calf ( Smith et al. 2000 ) .

Bison Calves were the true eye-catcher in the many herds of Bison observed at Yellowstone ; they were born in May as their size was still really petite as they stayed in close contact with their female parents at all times ( Green. 1993 ) . Calfs are able to maintain up with their herd in every bit small as 3 hours after they are born. but their female parents still maintain a close ticker on them as they are fishy to going the quarry of wolves or silvertip bears ( Wolff. 1988 ) . In a survey conducted in Wood Buffalo National Park. the herd would take many different safeguards in order to protect their calves such as: the female parent and calf would walk in the forepart of the herd when there was a wolf sighting. and the bulls would take up the dorsum of the herd to offer more protection ( Carbyn and Trottier. 1988 ) . The “Landscape of Fear” survey conducted in Yellowstone after the debut of wolves into Yellowstone demonstrated that female Bison with Calves were in fact noted to demo more watchfulness than in old old ages when wolves were non in the park ( Laundre et al. 2001 ) .

As in all animate beings fittingness is highly of import doing protecting the immature of the herd an even more of import undertaking. The female parents of the Bison Calves along with the Bulls of the herd will set themselves in the way of any marauder that comes in the manner of them and their immature. Even if an grownup Bison is killed in the procedure. their overall fittingness will still thrive as the immature of the herd have been saved by his/her actions ( Fuller et al. 2007 ) . Bison Calves are usually weaned off of their female parents when they are about 6 months old in which they start to fend for themselves. and support their districts from any marauders ( Green. 1992 ) . While detecting the Bison Calves a hypothesis was drawn: Until Bison Calfs are weaned from their female parent and can support themselves. they will pass bulk of their clip interacting with their female parent. and less clip executing behaviours that don’t necessitate interaction with their female parent.

METHODS & A ; MATERIALS
The site of observation was in the Lamar Valley of The Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming. The first three hours of observation took topographic point at a temperature of 65-70 grades with an cloud-covered cloud screen between the hours of 9 a. m. and 12 p. m. The last hr varied from cloudiness to a light-moderate rain with temperatures chilling off as flushing set in at about 5:30 p. m. The stuffs needed for this observation were really minimum as the country in which the observation took topographic point was set up. Dr. Krenz was the new wave driver who found us the best herd of Bison to detect to reply inquiries and hypothesis. Binocularss were used to maintain path of the Bison Calves as they were free to roll wherever they pleased. Scopes were another sing tool used as the Calves went further off from our site of observation.

The methods to the observation were besides really simple. Using a Focal Observation technique. four different Bison Calves were observed each for one hr at a clip ( 3. 600 Seconds ) . Prior to get downing the first hr long observation. an Ethogram ( Table 1 ) was made saying the action and description of the action that Bison Calves were executing. Get downing a halt ticker the first calf was observed. and utilizing the Ethogram each action performed was written down with the clip in which it occurred. Every clip the calf changed actions. it was once more written down with the clip in which the action took topographic point. After one hr the halt ticker was stopped and the information was analyzed ; finding how much clip in seconds the calf spent making each separate action. This method was repeated for all four calves.

Consequence
After finishing the focal observations for the four different calves. t-tests were performed to find the differences between the agencies. Pie charts were besides made to show the clip budgets ; the sum of clip each calf spent executing each behaviour. The t-test consequences show the differences between the agencies of a calf either interacting or non interacting with his/her female parent. The t-test consequence demonstrates a p-value of 0. 02 ( Table 6 ) which indicates there is a important difference between the calves interacting or non interacting with his/her female parent. The pie charts show the per centum of clip each calf spent executing a behaviour. Calf # 1 spent the bulk of its clip graze at 26 % with detecting close behind at 19 % . and 14 % of the clip it spent puting down ( Figure 1 ) . Calf # 2 exhausted 26 % of the clip feeding from his/her female parent. 23 % of the clip graze. and 14 % of the clip walking ( Figure 2 ) . Calf # 3 exhausted 45 % of the clip feeding from his/her female parent and 32 % of the clip graze ( Figure 3 ) . Calf # 4 exhausted 30 % of the clip feeding from his/her female parent. 23 % graze. and 17 % of the clip lying down ( Figure 4 ) .

The consequences were so categorized into interacting with the female parent and non-interacting with the female parent. This was done to find whether or non the calf exhausted bulk of his/her clip with the female parent during the first six months of their life. Calf # 1 spent more clip non interacting with his/her female parent at 2. 926 seconds/81 % of the clip. The calf did interact with his/her female parent but for merely 674 seconds/19 % of the clip ( Table 2 ) . Calf # 2 besides spent more clip non interacting with his/her female parent at 2. 558 seconds/71 % of the clip. and the calf spent 1. 042 seconds/29 % of the clip interacting with his/her female parent ( Table 3 ) . Calf # 3 was really near in Numberss between interacting and non interacting with his/her female parent. The calf spent 1. 868 seconds/52 % of the clip non interacting with his/her female parent. and the calf spent 1. 732 seconds/48 % of the clip interacting with his/her female parent ( Table 4 ) . The concluding calf spent more clip non interacting with his/her female parent at 2. 428 seconds/67 % . and the clip spent interacting with his/her female parent was 1. 172 seconds/33 % ( Table 5 ) .

Discussion
Comparing the consequences between the interacting and non-interacting groups included measuring the hypothesis: Until Bison Calfs are weaned from their female parent and can support themselves. they will pass bulk of their clip interacting with their female parent. and less clip executing behaviours that don’t necessitate interaction with their female parent. This hypothesis was rejected because even though the information does demo a important difference between the interacting and non-interacting classs. the calves spent the bulk of their clip non interacting with their female parent. The p-value was 0. 02 ( Table 6 ) . but the calf spent more clip without its female parent which is opposite of what the hypothesis was saying. The clip budget pie charts revealed calf # 1 spent the most clip graze. and calves # 2. # 3. and # 4 spent the bulk of their clip feeding from their female parents. Even though calves # 2. # 3. and # 4 spent the most of their clip executing one action ( suckling ) which included interacting with their ma. the entire clip spent interacting with their ma was much less than when they were non interacting with their ma.

Fitness is an of import factor in every animal’s life. Their ends are to assist their progeny survive. and once more reproduce feasible offspring at any cost. Since the reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone. the Bison have taken action to better protect their calves from going quarry of wolves along with grey bears. The female parents of the Bison Calves will put themselves in forepart of the herd and even in forepart of marauders in order to salvage their immature ( Carbyn and Trottier. 1988 ) . Throughout the 11 hr observation. bulls were really more likely to protect the calves ( Carbyn and Trottier. 1988 ) . Even if the female parent or bull of the herd is killed in the procedure of protecting their calves. the fittingness degrees of the Bison who was killed will still increase. This is because the immature will turn into an grownup Bison and reproduce feasible progeny of their ain.

During the observation. the calves stayed comparatively close to their female parent. but they besides felt safe plenty to roll about the herd. A inquiry that came to mind during the observations: do calves milk merely from their female parent or do all of the female parents of the herd supply milk to all the calves? Since the observations were merely 4 hours long it would be difficult to pull up an existent decision to the inquiry. but there were some actions and behaviours performed which demonstrated that calves merely milk from their ain female parent. When calves tried to milk from female parents other than their ain. the female parent would kick the calf off from her ; taking to a pre-conclusion that mothers merely let their ain calves to milk from her. Although the female parent did non let other calves to milk from her. it is shown through surveies that female parent bison will protect any immature in the herd from injury and marauders ( Coppedge et al. 1997 ) .

This was besides observed during the 4 hours. when calves would run excessively far off from the herd or from their female parents. the female parents would run after them and steer them back to the center of the herd. This behaviour was noticed the most when there were autos traveling through the Lamar Valley. When the calves would acquire near to the autos the female parents would put themselves in forepart of the auto or between the calf and the route so they would non acquire hurt. Even though there was a important difference of the agencies between interacting with the female parent and non-interacting with the female parent. the calf still spent most of his/her clip non interacting with his/her female parent.

Plants Cited

National Park Service. 2012. Yellowstone Bison ( Bison bison ) hypertext transfer protocol: //www. neptunium. gov/yell/naturescience/bison. htm

Meng & A ; Associates. 2012. National Bison Association.
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. bisoncentral. com/faqs # faq-nid-69.

Carbyn. L. N. . and Trottier. T. 1988. Descriptions of wolf onslaughts on bison calves in Wood Buffalo National Park. Arctic 41. 4: 297-302

Coppedge. B. R. . Carter. T. S. . Shaw. J. H. . and Hamilton. R. G. 1997. Agonistic behavior associated with orphan bison ( Bison bison L. ) calves released into a assorted resident population. Science 55. 1-2: 1-10.

Wolff. J. O. 1988. Maternal investing and sex ratio accommodation in American bison calves. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 23. 2: 127-133.

Green. W. C. H. 1992. The development of independency in bison: Pre-weaning spacial dealingss between female parents and calves. Animal Behaviour 43. 5: 759-773.

Laundre. J. W. . Hernandez. L. . and Altendorf. K. B. 2001. Wolfs. moose. and bison: restoring the “landscape of fear” in Yellowstone National Park. U. S. A. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 79. 8: 1401-1409.

Brookshier. J. S. . and Fairbanks. W. S. 2003. The nature and effects of mother-daughter associations in of course and forcibly weaned bison. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 81. 3: 414-423.

Fuller. J. A. . Garrot. R. A. . White. P. J. . Aune. K. E. . and Roffe. T. J. 2007. Reproduction and Survival of Yellowstone Bison. Journal of Wildlife Management 71. 7: 2365-2372.

Prescott. J. 1985. Play and the development of single and societal behaviour in the American bison. BIOL BEHAV 10. 3: 261-276.

Green. W. C. H. 1986. Age-related differences in nursing behaviour among American bison cattles. Journal of Mammalogy 67. 4: 739-741.

Green. W. C. H. 1993. Social effects of maternal age and experience in bison: Pre-and post-weaning contact care with girls. Ethology 93. 2: 146-160

Smith. D. W. . Clark. W. E. . Phillips. M. K. . Mack. J. A. . and Mech. L. D. 2000. Wolf-bison interactions in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Mammalogy 81. 4: 1128-1135