Crucible Term Paper Essay Research Paper Miller

Crucible Term Paper Essay, Research Paper

Miller captured the paranoia and hate of the 1692 Salem Witch Trials and made a controversial mention to his ain society s Witch Hunts during McCarthyism in the 1950s. In merely 146 pages, Miller told us the narratives of the lives of John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor, Abigail Williams and others during the 1692 Witch Trials in Salem Massachusettes. The quiet Salem community was populating merrily in their ain sleepy universe, until several local misss fell badly as their illness was blamed on witchery.

John Proctor was a husbandman in his in-between mid-thirtiess. He did non hold to be a zealot of any cabal in the town, but there was grounds in the books that he could non digest dissemblers. This is possibly the one thing that Proctor was afraid of going. He was a sort adult male who could non decline support to zealots without pulling their deepest choler. In his presence a sap felt his folly immediately, accordingly, a Proctor is ever marked for slander and calumny ( Miller, The Crucible 20 ) . Although he may come across as a steady mannered single, Proctor is non an untroubled adult male. His was a evildoer against his married woman, a evildoer against his community, a evildoer against his ain ethical motives, and a evildoer against his Puritanical society. He was so troubled by this wickedness of criminal conversation, that he came to see himself as a sort of a fraud, although he does non demo it on the surface for even a 2nd.

Elizabeth Proctor, John s married woman, is a strong adult female who knows about her hubby s wickedness but, like John, does non allow on to her secret. She spends most of the novel seeking to get by with her hubby s wickedness and as she comes to footings with it, Elizabeth is able to one time once more forgive her hubby and do an attempt to protect him from slander. This is what finally gets her and her hubby in problem with the tribunals.

Abigail Williams is Proctor s spouse in wickedness. She is one of the local misss who gets afflicted by the Satan. She is inherently evil and to cover up her ain scruples, she ends up impeaching about hold of her community of witchery and convinces the other stricken misss to make the same. To accomplish this, Abigail threatens the misss with these words: & # 8220 ; Now look you. All of you. We danced. . .Let either of you breathe a word, or the border of a word, about the other things, and I will come to you in the black of some awful dark and I will convey a pointy thinking that will shiver you. And you know I can make it. . . ( Miller, The Crucible 20 ) .

She still loves John at the beginning of the novel, but rapidly bends on him and his household with the accusals of several people in the community including Proctor and his married woman, Elizabeth.

There are other characters in The Crucible that serve assorted intents. All of his characters have built-in relation to the subject and no characters are introduced to ease the mechanics of the secret plan. Sarah Good, along with Rebecca Nurse and others, is one of the many accused enchantresss Tituba is brought in to present the misss motive for doing their accusals of witchery. Putnam land difference with Proctor is introduced to state the reader that there were subterranean motivations to the Witch Trials. We are aquatinted with Giles Corey to allow us cognize that non merely were adult females being accused of witchery, but work forces every bit good. Corey s decease was besides particularly barbarous, in his refusal to come in a supplication, he was pressed to decease with heavy rocks. Samuel Parris, Reverend Hale, and Judge Danforth are brought in as the prosecuting officers of the enchantresss, although Hale has a alteration of bosom towards the terminal of the novel and efforts to carry Proctor to lie to salvage his life instead than state the truth and salvage his repute.

Some dramatists have complained that play is one O

f the more naif signifiers of art, and even more dramatists complained that dramatic unfavorable judgment is one of the most naif signifiers of unfavorable judgment. Despite that, Miller put across in his works the old and seemingly bootless conflict about the nature of dramatic calamity. Miller dared to undertake difficult topics and the 1 that proved to be the most controversial of his clip.

The Crucible, more than anything else, was a sort of a societal commentary on the epoch of McCarthyism that swept through the America in the fiftiess. Senator Joe McCarthy accused many people of being Communist and distributing Communist thoughts. Many of those people were Blacklisted and had their callings ended by McCarthy s wild imputations. Miller compared this epoch of paranoia to the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. Therefore, The Crucible was born. Miller used the tragic subject of the chose of repute or decease many times, including in another of his celebrated plants, Death Of A Salesman. This implicit in subject is snared absolutely in another one of Miller s dramas, The Pussycat and the Expert Plumber Who Was a Man: . . .the one thing a adult male fears most following to decease is the loss of his good name. Man is evil in his ain eyes. . .and the lone manner he can happen regard for himself is by acquiring other people to state he s a nice chap. ( Miller, The Pussycat and the Expert Plumber Who Was a Man 37 )

This quotation mark is exactly what plagues John Proctor at the terminal of The Crucible in which he makes a determination to squeal a prevarication that he is a enchantress to salvage his life, or decline to squeal and salvage his repute, his good name. This is the basic premiss of Miller s plants.

Such a wondrous written drama as The Crucible can merely be complemented by wondrous written unfavorable judgments. Many of Miller s dramas, The Crucible in peculiar, have been compared to the plants of Sophicles and Ibsen. The premiss that was absorbed by this drama was the most valid and fertile topic for the play, that of the effort to demo adult male fighting to be at one with society ( Hogan 147 ) . He one time wrote in his essay, On Social Plaies:

The societal play, as I see it, is the mainstream and the antisocial play a beltway. I can no longer take with ultimate earnestness a play of single psychological science written for its ain interest, nevertheless full it may be of

penetration and precise observation. ( Miller, On Social Plays 1 )

Dramatic unfavorable judgment returns mostly by clich. The original clich about Miller after the success of All My Sons, Death of a Salesman, and The Crucible was that he was a dramatist of intense earnestness who attempted to germinate a modern equivalent of calamity from a preoccupation with societal issues ( Hogan 166 ) .

Basically, John Proctor s matter with Abigail Williams was the indirect cause of the Salem Witch Trials. Had the matter non occurred, Abigail would non hold gotten involved with Proctor, she would non hold gotten angry with his ignorance of her, and she would non hold accused him and his married woman of witchery. John Proctor s determination to either prevarication and salvage his life or state the truth to salvage his repute is the halfway subject of the drama. The undermentioned address by Proctor summarizes the point Miller was tuging to do magnificently:

Because it is my name! Because I can non hold another in my life!

Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am non worth the dust on

the pess of them that bent! How may I live without my name? I have given you my psyche ; go forth me my name! ( Miller, The Crucible 143 )

This could be interpreted as a message from Miller to those being accused of practising Communism, the enchantress trade of the fiftiess. Associating to the McCarthyism epoch of his clip, Miller captured the paranoia and hate of the 1692 Salem Witch Trials.

32e