Euthanasia An Opinion Essay Research Paper The

Euthanasia An Opinion Essay, Research Paper

The word `euthanasia? is a combination of the ancient Grecian words `eu? and `thanatos? , intending `a good decease? or `the conveying about of a soft and easy decease? . Nowadays, the significance of this word stands for clemency violent death. In entire, there are six different ways in which mercy killing can happen: Active mercy killing, which is the active intercession by a physician to end a patient? s life ; Passive ethanasia, the deliberate withholding of the patient? s medical intervention with the purpose to end life ; Voluntary mercy killing, on petition of the terminally sick patient, inquiring to recieve medical intervention in order to decease ; Involuntary mercy killing, stoping an able patient? s life against their will, or merely apparent slaying ; Non-voluntary mercy killing, stoping the life of a patient that is incapable of giving permission ; and Physician-assisted self-destruction, about the same as voluntary mercy killing, but alternatively the physician merely prescribes the deadly drug instead than giving it to the patient.

Today, the support for legalizing voluntary mercy killing additions with every twelvemonth. And harmonizing to statistics, this kind of mercy killing is supported by the bulk of people all over the universe. Merely a little minotity argues against this issue due to spiritual beliefs and moral or ethical dissensions. A current instance reasoning in favor of voluntary euthansia is the instance of Diane Pretty, who suffers from the incurable motor neurone disease. She bids for an aided self-destruction executed by her hubby and has passed the first phase of the legal conflict reasoning in her favor. Now, her instance has to be presented to the Director of Public Prosecusions, in order to forestall her hubby from being prosecuted if he should help her to end her life. Mary Warnock commented on this issue in `The Observer? of Sunday, September second. She was clearly able to separate between the moral and judicial facets of mercy killing, giving her statements in favor of Diane Pretty? s instance really much ground. Taking moral, ethical and spiritual beliefs in concern, Mary Warnock argues that those who protest against mercy killing are non the 1s condemned to populate the most painfull lives and that moral opinions in such instances ought to be done by the judicial sytem.

Another current instance takes topographic point in the Netherlands, the first state in the universe where, merely really late, voluntary mercy killing has been legalized.The new policy for this sort of mercy killing describes a set of rigorous standards that have to be followed. These are the regulations that must be satisfied for legal voluntary mercy killing:

-the patient? s petition for mercy killing must be voluntary and persist over clip

-the patient? s agony must be intolerable and untreatable

-the patient must be adequately informed about his/her medical status and options

-the decission must be reached in an on-going relationship between physician and patient

-there must be audience with at least one other doctor

-the decease must be carried out in a medically appropriate manner

In 1993, the Dutch parliament adopted guidelines for physicians practising voluntary mercy killing, in order to forestall them from being prosecuted. Allthough this kind of pattern has been traveling on for many old ages, it still was non officially endorsed by the authorities untill now.

Harmonizing to spiritual instruction, life is a `gift from God

? . Merely he can make up one’s mind when a life begins or ends. It is considered to be against the natural jurisprudence when person intentionally kills another without God? s authorization. Voluntary mercy killing interruptions this rule, for it is believed that people do non hold the right to take the clip of their ain decease. Yet, there are some exclusions to be considered refering the `sancity of life? . Capital Punishment for illustration, is still active in some Arabic states and besides in a twosome of States in America. These processs break the rule of the sancity of life excessively, although they seem to be morally acceptable for the bulk of the people populating in that peculiar part or state. And what about Self Defence? This affair besides breaks this rule. Ending person? s life, by chance or non, in order to protect one? s ain, seems to be morally accepted by the bulk aswell. And there is Abortion, an issue that can be more easy linked to Voluntary Euthanasia. Abortion is practiced in many states and is non any longer such a large issue as it used to be. A great sum of people still are against abortion, but these are most likely the same people that protest against mercy killing. This is likely due to the little indifference when it comes to the moral facet. Abortion is ending life before a kid is born and mercy killing is ending life before it of course ends ; the lone difference is the period of clip.

All these issues are related to the terminating of person? s life, wheather it is inadvertent, voluntay or nonvoluntary, in my sentiment, moral facets do non use for a bulk of people. I think that moral concerns are up to the person and their manner of managing this.

The potency for maltreatment, on the other manus, is a more serious affair. Yet, when looking at the new policy for mercy killing in the Netherlands, the potency for maltreatment appears to be instead weak. If adequate legal parties are involved in such a process as aided self-destruction, and if they are surveilled by the judicial system, the opportunity for maltreatment is low. Rules have to be really rigorous and if any of them are broken, the instance rapidly alterations to slaying.

In my sentiment, voluntary mercy killing should be accepted to a certain grade. Terminally sick patients who bid for an aided self-destruction should be accompanied by physicians, relations and doctors, in order, for those involved in the process, to be able to do the right opinions when the patient decides to end his life. And it is merely when all parties come to the same understanding that the process should be applied. Yet, the involvement of the patient should be prioritised. As I stated earlier that I do non believe that morality is applicable to the bulk, I do believe that the involvements, beliefs and ideas of the person are higher than any law.References: * Pickett, Joseph P. et Al.

`American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language? . Fourth Edition

Boston

Houghton Mifflin Company

2000* Baird, Robert M.

erectile dysfunction. Ethanasia: `The Moral Issues? .

American bison

Prometheus Books

1989* Thomasma, David C

erectile dysfunction. Birth to Death: `Science and Bioethicss?

Cambridge

University Press

1996* www.pdf/publicopinion.pdf* Warnock, Mary

`A good and merciful opinion?

London

The Observer

Sunday, September second, 2001