Is Genetic Engineering the Future of Life? Essay Sample
Chief inquiry: ‘Is familial technology the hereafter of life? ’ Thesis statement: Even though familial technology has many benefits. it should non be the hereafter of our lives.
This research is being conducted because I have a strong involvement in it. At first when we had to take a book to get down our thoughts. I picked up any book that I could happen. At first nil truly interested me. but so I picked up the book ‘Genetic Engineering’ . I flipped through the pages and read some pages here and at that place and I found it rather interesting. I like this subject because it shows me many advantages and disadvantages that it is difficult to take a side on which to back up. I think that larning about something of involvement that I know nil of will educate my equals and I at the same clip. and I would hold to the full understood the subject on my ain footings. My research includes information such as. Human familial technology. carnal familial technology. agricultural familial technology and root cell familial technology. It besides includes. the advantages towards the subject and how it helps many people in life and besides the disadvantages in life and how it affects people drastically. like losing a life or even for good disenabling people of all ages. To back up my thesis. many people say that it should non be used based on spiritual facets and that God is the lone 1 who should make and modify living things. Others besides think that the long-run effects are unknown and are excessively unsafe to take the hazard.
There has been many ailments about familial technology being unsafe. expensive. the methods may non be safe. it could extinguish cistrons that may be of import and most people don’t agree with it because of the unknown effects. The book I am utilizing ‘Genetic Engineering’ ( Thomas Parmalee ; Genetic Engineering ; 2008 ; ABDO Publishing Company ; Edina. Minnesota 2008 ; p39-40 ) besides mentions that worlds have been hybridizing for centuries and scientists subsequently found out that the beings have ne’er been able to reproduce. If GM species are let out into the wild the scientists can no longer command how the species reproduce and it will be impossible to repair and the ecosystem will be changed and travel out of manus. In decision. I think that familial technology should non be used in our hereafter lives and that we should populate a natural and healthy life. alternatively of one filled with chemicals and toxins. There are advantages to this certain subject but in my sentiment the disadvantages rank at a higher degree. as they are more fatal to lives and the planet we live around us.
What would we better have ; a life filled with toxins and chemicals which may salvage some lives but kill many in the long-run. or a life with natural and healthy elements that can allow the life rhythm flow as it should? In general. I think that bulk and some scientists will hold to halt familial technology as it has gone excessively far and that it may do jobs that will be irreversible. The chief thing that I want to turn out to my audience is that familial technology should non be used as a day-to-day operation by people who want to alter the manner nature is and that if we change everything to the manner we want it in life. so what’s worth populating if there’s no surprise? Because we know how everything is traveling to turn out. merely by genetically modifying the Deoxyribonucleic acid. Proof that I have gotten for my thoughts are from books. articles. and pictures about how familial technology affects us positively and how it affects us negatively.
Most people look at the positive side of things and barricade out the negative. which is non called being optimistic. Being optimistic agencies that you look at both the advantages and disadvantages from different positions and believe about the positives while excluding in head the negative sides. but seeking to do the most of it. I want my audience to rethink whether genetically modified existences. animate beings and harvests should be allowed in our hereafter. I will be assisting them to believe in ways. non merely about the positive and how it could salvage life. but the disadvantages of the positives. and the disadvantages in general. Some disadvantages of the positives are. if we save excessively many lives the universe will go excessively overpopulated. we will alter the nature of life. we will destroy nutrient ironss. everything will be precisely how people want them to be. nil will be a surprise in life any longer. life will so go rather dull and deadening. and everything that we change or alter. will be irreversible.
Disadvantages are people deceasing. make fulling our nutrients and harvests with chemicals to ‘kill’ pesticides but kill us in the long term. nil will be organic. most foods will be lost and besides it affects people sacredly as they think that God is the lone 1 who decides what things are and what they will look like. Overall. I think that familial technology is a absorbing topic to research and larn more about. but I don’t think that it should be carried out for farther usage in the hereafter unless for fatal diseases. or when it is the last option to fall back to. We should be populating a healthy natural life. non a life filled with chemicals. which may kill us in the long term. So my undertaking will hopefully explicate the advantages and disadvantages of familial technology and it will explicate why it should non be used further in our hereafter.
