NATO Essay Research Paper The North Atlantic

NATO Essay, Research Paper

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been a soundless spouse on the universe

phase for more than half of the century and the most successful

political-military confederation in history. The United Nations and their

peacekeeping attempts have had the limelight for the past few old ages. However the

driving force behind any successful understanding or, if needed, action on the portion

of several states has been because of the strong foundation and experience of

NATO and its members. The undermentioned study will chronicle the events taking up

to the creative activity of NATO, its first decennary, the changeless battle with communism

in the decennaries that proceed, and eventually the challenges for NATO today and in

the hereafter. In the old ages after World War II, a new menace encroached upon the

leaders of Western Europe and their hopes of a stable peace. This menace would

be from the turning laterality of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics ( USSR )

in Eastern Europe. The USSR had an increasing appetency for the smaller states

to her West. These aggressive demands for district and the placing of

installings in taken states fueled the frights of many that the USSR was

processing toward a 3rd universe war. Britain and France, non desiring to do the

error once more of pacifying this new threat until it was excessively late, developed the

Dunkirk Treaty in 1947. This pact in kernel pledged a common defence against

any aggression. The USSR answered this by making a European Communist

organisation called the Cominform and it rejected the European Recovery Program,

which is normally known as the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan, named for the

US Secretary of State, was fundamentally a fiscal bailout for the European

states. These states were hungering because of the slow and near fillet of

the coal and agricultural industries after WWII. The US offered 1000000s of

dollars to all of Europe to assistance in reconstructing for four grounds. First, Europe

had been a great market place imports and exports for the US. Second,

historically West Germany had been an industrial hub and needed to be brought

back to tip-top form to buffer the spread outing USSR. Third, with its increasing

mass the USSR was going a rival to the US. Lastly, without this assistance Western

Europe might look to the USSR for aid, which would do life a batch tougher for

American involvements. The twelvemonth of 1948 was polar for Europe. In February, the

Communists in Prague staged a putsch vitamin D? etat and the spring brought the beginning

of the Cold War. Immediately after WWII, Germany was divided in to occupation

zones by Britain, France, the US, and USSR. The capital of Germany at the clip

was Berlin, which happened to fall in the Soviet zone. The regulating

disposal located in Berlin fell, because of the obvious ground of? excessively

many cooks spoil the stock? . When this happened, the USSR demanded that Berlin

go solely portion of the Soviet zone, since its position as capital was ruined.

The USSR enforced this opinion by obstructing all land routes into and tried to

force the other powers out of its several sectors of Berlin. Finally the

Berlin Blockade was squelched by a military airlift that lasted the remainder of the

twelvemonth. The metropolis still remained divided and became known as East ( Soviet

controlled ) and West Berlin. This evildoing on the portion of the USSR prompted

dialogues between Western Europe, the US and Canada that resulted in the

North Atlantic Treaty. The linguistic communication of the North Atlantic Treaty originally

consisted of its preamble and 14 articles. The preamble provinces that

members will advance common values and will? unify their attempts for a

corporate defense. ? The cardinal article of the North Atlantic Treaty is figure

five ( it? s the 1 that inspired my rubric ) it reads, ? The Parties agree that

an armed onslaught against one or more of them? shall be considered an onslaught

against them all. ? Another interesting article is the last one, figure

14, and it calls for the deposition of the official transcripts of the pact

to be kept in the US Archives. The US already was set uping itself as the

dominant member of an organisation that is supposed to be based on equal

duty. After the confirmation of this pact the construction of the North

Atlantic Treaty Organization ( NATO ) began. The highest policy-making organic structure in

NATO is the North Atlantic Council, which met in Paris until 1967. The council

composed of lasting delegates from all members was responsible for general

policy, budgetary lineations, intergovernmental audience and administrative

actions. There are two chief impermanent commissions that answer straight to the

council. Those are the Secretariat, which handles non-military maps of the

confederation ( economic, scientific, cultural, and environmental issues ) , and the

Military Committee or the Defense Planning Committee ( DPC ) , which consists of

the heads of staff of the assorted armed forces. They meet to discourse military

policies, develop defence programs for their several countries, determine the force

demands, and deploy and exercising the forces under their bid. The forces

straight below the DPC are the Allied Commands Europe ( was foremost headed by

Eisenhower ) , Atlantic, and Channel and the Regional Planning Group ( for North

America ) . To help in transporting out their planetary functions, the council and the DPC

hold established commissions to cover with exigencies and the new menace of

atomic power. They meet merely in a desperate state of affairs. However, until the eruption

of the Korean War in 1950, NATO had no existent military construction. The Korean War

was at first perceived as portion of a world-wide Communist violative beginning in

the divided Germany. This perspective lead to the NATO military force that was

explained in the preceding paragraph. Within NATO? s foremost decennary the chief

military and security forces have come from the US. Along with this the US was

depended on for the resurgence of Europe? s economic system and civil order. The Korean War

besides brought an overall enlargement of the organisation. By 1955, Greece, Turkey,

and the Federal Republic of Germany ( West Germany ) had entered as members. The

lone commissariats for West Germany was non allowed to fabricate NBC ( atomic,

biological, and chemical ) arms. With the rearmament of West Germany in

advancement, the USSR and her Alliess decided to make a treaty organisation of

their ain. The Warsaw Pact, signed in 1955, combined to powers of Albania,

Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and of class

the USSR. The members of this communist confederation were under rigorous control of

the Sovietss headquartered in Moscow. Key posts in these satellite states were

normally ran by soviet-born or soviet-trained officers and all their equipment

was standardized to the ordinances of the USSR. The construction of the Warsaw

Treaty Organization ( WTO ) was similar to NATO. Two major organic structures carried out the

policies of the treaty. The first was the Political Consultative Committee, which

handled all activities except military, and the Unified Command of Pact Armed

Forces, which had authorization over the military personnels assigned to certain members. On

paper you can see the similarities, but the USSR regulation with absolute laterality.

When members tried to interrupt away or seek to fall in NATO, the effects were

terrorizing. In 1956, Hungary tried to withdrawal from the WTO ; the USSR took

one-sided military action against the rebellion killing 200,000 people. Another

member province, Czechoslovakia attempted to go forth and was fleetly forced back by a

Soviet invasion. Albania seemed to happen a manner out, because of their confederation

with China and some other ideological grounds, and broke off in 1968. With the

USSR? s undeniable chokehold on its adjacent states in topographic point, the race

began for entire high quality on the planetary scene over the US and her Alliess. The

chief gage for this was atomic arm progresss and reserves. Who could hold

the biggest and best in the shortest sum of clip and who would make bold to utilize it

foremost? These pressing inquiries tainted the following three decennaries and worried some

of the other NATO members that the US wouldn? Ts honor their pledge if the USSR

were to make

the indefinable to Western Europe. NATO members tried to maintain a

positive position, but several events caused a sense of dissatisfaction of

its worth by the terminal of the 1960ss. To get down the decennary off the USSR officially

blockaded their side of Berlin by raising the? wall? . At first the Berlin

Wall consisted merely of biting wire, but people were? get awaying? to East

Germany, so an existent concrete wall was constructed with all the bells and

whistlings, like checkpoints with armed guards and minefields. The people of East

Germany were captives in their ain state and were non allowed to reach or

visit household. In add-on, the backdown of France, one of the initiation

members, in 1966 by President Charles de Gaulle sent daze moving ridges through the

organisation. Although they continued to lend to the confederation, they left

the regulating responsibilities to the other members. Besides NATO was pressured by the

smaller nation-states to be come members and that would take a batch of support,

clip, and concentrate off from the jobs in Eastern Europe. One of the chief

factors of the late 1960ss and early 1970ss was America? s engagement in

the Vietnam War. This dismaying war sapped the US economic system, morale, and foreign

policy art. Although the 1970s began with the Strategic Arms Limitation

Negotiations ( SALT I ) , this decennary created more disillusionment by universe powers as the

Soviets continued to quickly stock their military and atomic armories. In 1979,

NATO initiated a dual-track plan where new defence attempts were coupled with

new attempts in rapprochement and cooperation. Unfortunately, the stairss taken by

both sides were little and uneventful and normally were retracted within a short

clip. This brings us to the Reagan old ages, the 1880ss, and to the closest

watched political tug-a-war in old ages. This decennary opened with a deepening crisis

and in 1983 the USSR failed to forestall the deployment of intermediate-range

ballistic missiles, sent to antagonize the 1s they had pointed a Europe? s

major citations. It is possible to state that NATO help greatly in detering the Soviet union

from following through on assailing Western Europe. The? game? had gotten

lifelessly serious and in 1987 both sides agreed to negotiations. Out of these negotiations came

the Intermediate-range Nuclear Force ( INF ) Treaty, which non merely gave people a

sense of alleviation across the universe it besides began the dislocation of the Warsaw Pact

and the WTO. The alteration in the air current prompted the Berlin Wall that separated a

people for over 25 old ages to be torn down and Germany was eventually

reunified. The late 1880ss to the ninetiess eventually saw the beginning of

the terminal to the Cold War. This clip besides showed the universe the success of NATO and

the incorporate attempts of its members in run intoing the challenge of the Communists

and the WTO. NATO had eventually shown itself to be a feasible beginning for

communicating and declaration between cabals alternatively of war. That became more

evident in the 1990s, with the continued depletion of atomic armories on both

sides, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact in 1991, and the continued responsibilities to

aid return the states of Eastern Europe to normalcy. An illustration of this is

evident in Bosnia/Herzegovina and Kosovo. These countries and people have been able

to beef up their chauvinistic feeling with both encouraging and black

consequences. Through the attempts of the UN and NATO forces a peaceable decision may

be in the hereafter for this troubled civilization. The organisation has already placed

in the plants the inclusion of the Czech Republic ( formerly portion of

Czechoslovakia ) , Hungary, and Poland. These negotiations are puting the phase for

NATO? s most important enlargement. These states will necessitate modern military

preparation, ascents on their communications, bid, and air defence systems at

an estimated cost of between $ 25 and $ 35 billion over 13 old ages. The

members of NATO wage out this money, the US portion being about $ 200

million over 10 old ages. There was a clip that even the idea of these

states come ining NATO peacefully was unheard of. These new members make

NATO? s involvements in the Balkans even more seasonably. Over the past few old ages, the

constitution of a long-run stableness in the Balkans has fallen on NATO? s

already overweighed shoulders. The former Yugoslavia is one country of Europe where

the terminal of the cold war has non brought about the general tendency towards

openness, democracy and integrating that we have seen elsewhere. Ending this

anomalousness will intend looking beyond the clip frame of NATO? s Stabilization Force

in Bosnia. Once the parties realize that settling differences peacefully and

democratically truly is the lone feasible option, so Bosnia and other states

in the part will hold the right to the fullest integrating into the

international community. In Kosovo, where the universe community is confronting

human-centered, political and legal quandary, a solution must be found that allows

the Cultural Albanians more liberty within the confines of the Federal Republic

of Yugoslavia. In happening such a solution, we must avoid a state of affairs where moral

considerations are pitted against international jurisprudence. And we must retrieve that a

security policy that doesn? t return as its point of mention the demands of

humanity, hazards enduring the worst possible fate- a slide into irrelevancy. In

Kosovo? s immediate vicinity, NATO has helped to supply hope and some

stableness, every bit good as aid in get bying with the refugees in Albania and

Macedonia. The latter state is hosting a NATO extraction force, ready to

support the confirmation mission deployed in Kosovo. Hopefully, the chance of

long-run stableness, coupled with the desire for economic benefits, will pull

the full Balkans back into the European mainstream. None of this will go on

without NATO continued belief in? corporate security? . To cover with these

challenges, there is a demand for farther betterments in the inter-operability

and sustainability of confederation forces. The hereafter of NATO lies in holding quickly

deployable capablenesss to carry through an increasing scope of missions. The military

forces of NATO Alliess will necessitate to be on the same wavelength ; able to travel

efficaciously and rapidly, to pass on with one another- service to service, as

good as ally to ally- in a universe where information engineerings are going

portion of the modern soldier? s basic kit. Trying to remain every bit current as possible

on NATO? s motions is non an easy occupation these yearss. Every hr seems to convey a

new page to NATO? s celebrated history. We can merely sit back and watch the

farther developments in the Balkan part and in the other? hot spots? around

the universe, like Korea, Rwanda, India, and even within the NATO members

themselves. Other of import issues approach on the skyline that will strongly

consequence NATO, the fusion of Europe, China? s menaces to security and the

inquiries of a possible planetary peace in the millenium. Can NATO run into these

challenges? Can it germinate in the shadow of the Cold War? The following few old ages will

unfold an exciting chapter in the history of the North Atlantic Treaty

Organization.

Ergang Ph.D. , R. , Europe in Our Time ( D.C. Heath and Co. 1958 ) Goldfield, D. ,

Abbott, C. , DeJohn Anderson, V. , Argersinger, J. & A ; P. , Barney, Wm. , and

Weir, R. , The American Journey: A History of the United States: vol. 2 ; fellow.

29, pp. 890 and chap.33, pp. 1031-2 Guehenno, J. , trans. by Elliot, V. , The End

of the Nation-State ( UN of Minnesota 1995 ) Nelan, B. , ? A Popular Bad Idea? ,

Time, May 11, 1998 v151 n18 p38 Remington, R. , The Warsaw Pact ( The MIT Press

1971 ) Stanley, T. , NATO in Passage: The Future of the Atlantic Alliance ( Praeger

Pub. 1965 ) Toland, J. , The Last Hundred Days ( Random House 1966 ) T. Caspody, A.

Millar, , J. Matousek, ? NATO & # 8217 ; s shaky new three: the confederation & # 8217 ; s three

prospective members haven & # 8217 ; t made an informed public pick? , The State, March

16, 1998 v266 n10 p18 ( 4 ) ? NATO? s New Challenge: What is NATO Without a Cold

War? ? , Time International, Dec. 10, pg. 50+ ? Open Doors: NATO reaches out to

Europe? s other half? , Time International, Dec. 10, 1998 p55 Various

information including referrals and rubric in writing attained at www.nato.com