Nature Morality Essay Research Paper Moral or
Nature Morality Essay, Research Paper
Moral or Immoral?
& # 216 ; Peoples consider nature morality. They associate nature as being pure and good. Unnatural as being corrupt and evil.
& # 216 ; Morality is based on religious and personal beliefs and on recognized criterions for the regard of others.
& # 216 ; Good judgement should non compare what & # 8217 ; s common with what & # 8217 ; s right or good. Nonconformity is non the same as immoral.
& # 216 ; Some people confuse what & # 8220 ; is & # 8221 ; with what they & # 8220 ; believe & # 8221 ; ought to be.
& # 216 ; Nature is a moral. Not moral or immoral. There & # 8217 ; s sunlight, flowers, and sea zephyr, but on the other manus there & # 8217 ; s diseases, temblors, and hurricanes.
Immoral
& # 216 ; Some people think that you must be married in order to hold sex ; and because homophiles are non married, they are incorrect.
& # 216 ; Many people think that homosexual matrimonies would destruct households, and that it is a menace to society and its kids. Children are vulnerable and impresstional.
& # 216 ; Many say it is besides a menace to tradition. No alteration in tradition is wanted. It would take society corruptness. ( Wasn & # 8217 ; t bondage and segregation tradition? )
& # 216 ; Many people say it & # 8217 ; s non natural. God created & # 8220 ; Adam and Eve & # 8221 ; NOT & # 8220 ; Adam and Steve. & # 8221 ;
& # 216 ; & # 8220 ; What if everyone were homosexual? The whole human species would be wiped out in a few decennaries! & # 8221 ; But on the other manus what if everyone had 8 kids?
& # 216 ; In the Institute for Sex Research Survey, 49 % said cheery matrimonies would take to society corruptness. 63 % considered it harmful to the American life.
& # 216 ; In 1981 there was no uncertainty that being homosexual was considered immoral. 71 % population said that it was incorrect. 295 considered homosexual non immoral. ( 10 % of, which was made up by the H
omosexuals themselves. )
& # 216 ; Later in the Institute for Sex Research, 78 % people felt homosexual Acts of the Apostless were ever incorrect. 81 % of people claimed non to cognize a cheery individual.
& # 216 ; Homosexual can be considered inherently ( bing ) immoral, for there is no & # 8220 ; act & # 8221 ; stating that it is moral or immoral.
Moral
& # 216 ; Denial of matrimony to homosexual people is an ex. of dual criterion. ( Homosexuals can & # 8217 ; T marry, but straight persons can? )
& # 216 ; Sexual activity was around before matrimony. The original thrust for matrimony was secular, non spiritual, economic, non moral. Old-style of matrimony was polygamy. When male parents gave away girls, at the terminal of the ceremonial we have a adult male ( the of import 1 ) and his married woman ( his new & # 8220 ; possession. & # 8221 ; ) Now yearss we have gotten rid of traditional nuptials lines.
& # 216 ; Many points of false impressions of forbiding homosexual matrimonies because of & # 8220 ; tradition & # 8221 ; have been brought up.
& # 216 ; In the 16-century, many homosexual twosomes got married in churches. The focal point on matrimony is counterproductive. Peoples should specify morality for cheery relationships. The obvious surrogate is matrimony.
& # 216 ; Father Charles Curren defines morality for homosexual matrimonies as endeavoring for love and permanence. The church is an appropriate topographic point to get down a reform to demo society that homosexualism is non immoral because of tradition or spiritual beliefs.
Still Immoral or Moral?
& # 216 ; Whether a man/woman loves a man/woman is non a moral issue but a personal affair.
& # 216 ; Is being homosexual immoral? No! Be some cheery relationships iniquitous? Decidedly! But so are some heterosexual relationships.
& # 216 ; While covering with a homosexual affair, replace heterosexual with homosexual. Will the claim keep up if the issue is considered on a context of heterosexualism?
