To Legalize or Not to Legalize Marijuana Essay Sample

There is a batch of contention about legalising marihuana. There are two sides of the narrative merely like with everything else. Some people are all for doing it legal. Then there are others that are wholly against it. There are many facets to look at when looking at the issue. There are traveling to be positives and negatives in both facets of the issue. There are many provinces that have legalized marihuana for medical usage. There is besides the economic system that should be looked at. The authorities wastes so much money seeking to command the whole drug trafficking issue that it is unreal. Then. there is the negative side. Peoples in the drug trade are non merely involved in utilizing and selling drugs. they are besides involved in other offenses that are committed. This will non assist maintain the drugs off the street. Let’s take a expression at both sides of the issue.

If the authorities were to legalise marihuana. it would decidedly cut down the population in the prisons. “Instead of blowing the money that the authorities has. why non merely turn it around? There are 500. 000 people in prison are in at that place for drug discourtesies. That includes 10s of 1000s of people in prison for marihuana related charges. ” ( Ward. P. ( 2010 ) Is that unreal or what? The authorities is keeping non-violent wrongdoers and allowing the violent wrongdoers off on probation and/or word. Why Lashkar-e-Taiba slayings out on probation and/or parole when we have non-violent wrongdoers traveling to prison for old ages. What a immense waste of money. Syracuse. N. Y. ( 2011 ) provinces. “Why non legalise marihuanas and get down doing a net income? The United States could do one million millions every twelvemonth by legalising. merchandising. and taxing marihuana. ” The authorities in Nevada has a proposal that would work in all of the provinces. Spillman. B. para 6 ( 2010 ) provinces. “That there is a group that wants electors to authorise 120 retail mercantile establishments for marihuana and 50 sweeping agriculturists. The proposal would name for $ 50 per ounce excise revenue enhancement at the sweeping degree and gross revenues revenue enhancement would use on retail. ”

There are many grounds that marihuana should be legalized. Legalizing marihuana would liberate up our communities resources to contend offense against people and belongings. If the authorities legalized marijuana the constabulary could worry more about protecting guiltless people from the people that would still perpetrate offenses that have nil to make with marihuana. It would besides unclutter up the tribunal system. There merely is non adequate Judgess to manage all the instances upon instances. This would wholly unclutter out the 10s of 1000s of tribunal dockets across the United States. It would besides clearly cut down the official corruptness job that we have in the United States. There are so many crooked bulls in the United States that it is pathetic. There are police officers that make trades with drug traders and some that confiscate drugs and turn around and sell them for their ain net income. Legalizing marihuana would set a damper on organized offense. It is like when intoxicant was illegal. Manufacturing intoxicant was a large trade. They set up distribution webs. bribing functionaries. and taking the opportunity of hiting police officer or rivals one time in a piece. It was merely like the drug life is today.

Legalizing marihuana would salvage revenue enhancement money. The revenue enhancements that the people of the United States wage are wasted. “The cost of drug trafficking entirely is $ 6. 2 billion in 1986. If we added in imprisoning users. sellers. and the 1s that commit offense to pay for their drugs it would be good over $ 10 billion dollars. ” ( The Pragmatist parity 6 ( 1988 ) Legalizing marihuana would do it a batch safer for consumers. Right now there is no stating what could be put into the marihuana that people buy off the streets. If it were legal it would hold all the consumer safety characteristics. It would hold everything from warning labels. warning labels. maker answerability. merchandise quality. and instruction sheets. Then. of class there are grounds why the authorities should non legalise marihuana. Los Angeles. Calif para 7 ( 2010 ) provinces. “A survey conducted in several vicinities showed that between 4 % and 14 % of drivers who sustained hurts or died in traffic accidents tested positive for delta-tetrahydrocannabinol. or THC. the active ingredient in marihuana.

Because marihuana negatively affects driver’s judgement. motor accomplishments and reaction clip. it stands to ground that legalize marihuanas would take to more accidents and human deaths affecting drivers under the influence. ” This is merely like imbibing and drive. Belling. T. para 3 ( 2010 ) provinces. “People in the drug trade do non merely commit drug related offenses. they are involved in any and all offenses that they can perchance do money at. They will go on their condemnable behaviour. They will non vanish. ” There is ground to believe that drug traders will go on to sell drugs to underage kids. That would do a immense struggle in the communities in the United States. The authorities will besides overtax marihuana merely like they have done intoxicant and baccy. This will still give traders the opportunity to maintain on traveling with the illegal merchandising of marihuana. There is besides the fact that yes marihuana will run into the U. S. Food and Drug Administration criterions.

Yes that is a good thing. But. there is still the fact that it could destruct lives. The authorities will acquire the money that people have stolen from their friends. household. neighbours. even aliens. That does non assist with the robbery offenses that are traveling on in the United States. It is believed that there will still be street traders. This will non assist with the population in prisons. The Numberss of nuts and maltreaters could and really good may travel up. The drug related offenses may be replaced with belongings offenses. violent offenses. robberies committed by those nuts and maltreaters that are unable to do it in the occupation market. ( Belling. T para 4 ( 2010 )

Legalizing marihuana for medical grounds has been rather the stepping rock for our state. There are still legal jobs with medical marihuana. Yes. people have to hold a medical card in order to possess and utilize marihuana. That does non intend that the people that do hold a medical card are non sharing with their friends and selling to underage kids. This is a large issue for people in the United States. What happens when these people that misuse their card? Geting the medical marihuana card is far from easy. So why would these people risk losing their card? They merely do non care. They are making whatever they can to do a small excess hard currency on the side. Until they get caught.

Once the authorities legalizes marijuana some people believe that the dependence rate and the opprobrious rates will travel up. There will be a batch more people in the United States that usage marihuana. most of these people will non be able to keep occupations. Will this set a strain on constabulary. fire. medical. ambulance services? Due to the sum of people that will be utilizing and driving this could go on. It will decidedly do it harder for employers to happen employees that are 100 % drug free.

Another inquiry that tends to come up when speaking about legalising marihuana is: What other illegal drugs will the authorities attempt to legalise following? There are other jobs that come along with the other drugs. Cocaine. LSD. PCP. diacetylmorphine. Methedrine are all immense subscribers to the offenses that are committed here in the United States. There are tonss of people in gaols. prisons. rehabilitation centres for all of these other drugs. More of the revenue enhancement payer’s money paying for maintaining drugs off the streets and trying to assist nuts and maltreaters change their lives. Yes. some of these nuts and maltreaters do turn around their lives after acquiring the aid.

Legalizing marihuana would profit the economic system every bit long as it is taxed merely like baccy. intoxicant. and even sugar. Crime would non lift because marihuana is non a narcotic. The money that the authorities spends maintaining marijuana traders and users behind bars could be used by provinces to better instruction. roadways. wellness attention. It could profit the United States in so many different countries that it is unreal. The same sort of control that regulates baccy and intoxicant could easy transition the control of marihuana. Tobacco husbandmans are regulated to a great extent by the authorities. Why can’t the authorities do the same with marihuanas? They control the gross revenues to underage kids by look intoing designation cards and necessitating in some provinces that people that serve intoxicants have a server’s licence. That would assist with maintaining driving the under the influence.

There are categories that people have to take and a trial that people in some provinces have to go through in order to sell or function intoxicant. The authorities could do a jurisprudence that you must hold a server’s licence to sell or function marihuana. There is a batch of different ways to near legalising marijuana. It looks like the positive truly outweighs the negative in this issue. Yes of class. there is traveling to be negative things that still go on. Peoples are non perfect and will non of all time be perfect. Peoples have a pick and they should be held responsible for the picks that they make. If they choose non to follow the Torahs so they evidently need to larn the difficult manner. It would be merely like it is now with intoxicant. Drinking and drive. smoke and driving the same thing the same effects. Distributing to the delinquency of a minor intoxicant or marihuana should hold the same effects. Truly there would non be that much of a difference than what the authorities has done with intoxicant. Think about it. The research proves that legalising marihuana would decidedly be worth the attempt that the revenue enhancement remunerators and the authorities have to set into it.

Mentions

Belling. T. ( 2010 ) Why Legalizing Drugs Is A Bad Idea Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //caselaw4cops. net/articles/legalizing_drugs. hypertext markup language California should merely state no ; legalising marihuanas through prop. 19 would merely add to the state’s jobs. ( 2010. Aug 25 ) . Los Angeles Times. pp. A. 17-A. 17. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //search. proquest. com/docview/746644631? accountid=32521 Legalizing marihuana to make new jobs: Minister. ( 2011. May 19 ) . Antara. pp. n/a. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //search. proquest. com/docview/901278956? accountid=32521 Legalizing marihuana would hike economic system. ( 2011. Oct 31 ) . The Post – Standard. pp. A. 13. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //search. proquest. com/docview/901278956? accountid=32521 Pragmatist ( 1988 ) Twelve Reasons To Legalize Drugs Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. druglibrary. org/think/~jnr/12reason. htm Paula. R. W. ( 2010. Nov 06 ) . Panel debates virtues of legalising marihuana usage. McClatchy – Tribune Business News. pp. n/a. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //search. proquest. com/docview/762546348? accountid=32521 Spillman. B. ( 2010. Aug 01 ) . Legalizing. taxing marihuana opposed. Las Vegas Review – Journal. pp. B. 2. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //search. proquest. com/docview/734576327? accountid=32521