A Clockwork Orange Essay Research Paper Moral
A Clockwork Orange Essay, Research Paper
Moral freedom is one of the most if non the most of import of any freedoms available to worlds. Moral freedom is the ability to either choose to execute good or bad workss or both. Totalitarian authoritiess take away one? s single pick and therefore, suppress and smother the psyche. The scene in A Clockwork Orange is a general parallax to a totalitarian and oppressive authorities. Alex, the chief character, is the representative of the common adult male, and his battle in this type of authorities. In the novel, A Clockwork Orange, Anthony Burgess suggests that the importance of moral freedom be stressed even for felons condemned by society.
? There was me, that is Alex, and my three droogs, that is Pete, Georgie, and Dim? .and we sat in the Korova milk saloon doing up our rassadooks what do with the eventide? ( 1.1 ; ch. 1 ) , this was a typical dark of a? nadsat? or adolescent. A clump of goons, traveling around perpetrating Acts of the Apostless of force and offense, for they have moral freedom ; which they choose to make bad. First they assault a immature adult male in an back street, and so they go to this writer? s house, and vandalise it and ravish his married woman. But while at this house, they come across a book called A Clockwork Orange, and Alex reads about it: ? The effort to enforce upon adult male, a animal of growing and capable of sugariness, to seep juicily at the last unit of ammunition the bearded lips of God, to try to enforce, I say, Torahs and conditions appropriate to a mechanical creative activity? ( 1.21 ; ch. 2 ) , at which he ironically laughs and tears up.
After an eventful dark like that, Alex goes place, ? Where I lived was with my dadda and Dendranthema grandifloruom in the flats of Municipal Flatblock 18A, between Kingsley Avenue and Wilsonway? ( 1.31 ; ch. 3 ) . There he goes to his room, and turns on his stereo and his good side comes alive. His deep love for classical music like Mozart, Beethoven, and G.F. Handel, can be seen clearly. In the forenoon he decides non to travel to school, and he ends up violently ravishing two? devotchkas? , once more exposing his moral freedom to be bad. That same dark, they try to rob an old? psitsa? that has a hundred cats populating with her. Alex ends up killing the old lady, but he gets caught by the? millicents? and will be tried as an grownup.
While in tribunal, Alex promotes his artlessness and blames his comrades. ? Where are the others? Where are my stinking faithless droogs? One of my curst grazhny bratties chained me on the glazzies. Get them before they get off. It was their thought, brothers. They like forced me to make it? ( 1.65 ; ch. 6 ) . His supplications are futile as he gets sent off to the Staja, besides known as a penitentiary. From that point on, Alex feels oppressed by the little cells full of older felons. Although these barbarous state of affairss fit Alex, he realizes that merely penitence and good behaviour in the eyes of the functionaries can let go of him from the jaws of justness. So in order to be viewed as a reforming condemnable Alex turns to faith. He plays the music during spiritual ceremonials and becomes good friends with the prison chaplain. However Alex? s purpose on reforming was non a spiritual facet but the quickest so he can acquire avenge on thee faithless droogs and return to his thug life. He hears about a new technique, ? the Ludovico Technique, ? will acquire him out rapidly. He talks to the chaplain, but the latter dramatis personaes shadows about it by come backing: ? I must squeal I portion those uncertainties. The inquiry is whether such a technique can truly do a adult male good. Goodness comes from within 6655321. Goodness is something chosen. When a adult male can non take he ceases to be a adult male? ( 2.83 ; ch. 1 ) . This does non discourage Alex from the idea of an early release but merely makes his desire for it greater. He is picked to be the first trial suject of the new Ludovico technique. With the augmentation in population comes an addition in offense excessively, which brings new techniques to? remedy? or? repair? the condemnable head. The curate says: ? The authorities can non be concerned any longer with antique penalogical theories. Cram felons together and see what happens. You get concentrated criminalism, offense in the thick of penalty? Kill the condemnable physiological reaction, that? s all? ( 2.92 ; ch. 2 ) . Alex thinks it? s an ideal solution, to go good and free at the same clip and acquire out rapidly, nil incorrect with that at all. But he does non reali
ze that his avidity is blinding him from the subjugation and he is being robbed of his moral freedom.
The prison chaplain once more tries to warn him: ? Very difficult ethical inquiries are involved? you are to be made into a good male child, 6655321. Never once more will you hold the desire to perpetrate Acts of the Apostless of force or to pique in any manner whatsoever against thee State? s Peace. I hope you take all that in. I hope you are perfectly clear in your ain head about that? Is a adult male who chooses the bad possibly in some manner better than a adult male who has the good imposed on him? In taking to be deprived of the ability to do an ethical pick, you have in a sense truly chosen the good? ( 2.95 ; ch. 3 ) .
The rehabilitation technique used upon Alex is that of antiphonal conditioning, with the usage of drugs and movies. This type of conditioning forces Alex to experience ill when confronted with evil sites or ideas. Besides included in this conditioning was the usage of classical music, which Alex used to love, and now feels nausea when he hears it. After his two weeks, a two-week period at the establishment, Alex seems to be? cured, ? a state of affairs is created where he is to utilize force against an aggressive adult male, but he is unable to because of the conditioning. All the people go toing the presentation see how effectual the new technique is, but merely the chaplain of the Staja sees the deficiency of moral freedom. He says: ? He has no existent pick, has he? Self-interest, fright of physical hurting, drove him to that grotesque act of self-abasement. Its falseness was clearly to be seen. He ceases besides to be a animal capable of moral pick? ( 2.126 ; ch. 7 ) . The go toing physician merely answers: ? These are nuances? We are non concerned with motivation, with higher moralss. We are concerned merely with cutting down offense? ( 2.126 ; ch. 7 ) .
After being released Alex goes back place to Flatblock 18A, where surprisingly his parents think he has escaped and they now live with a new boarder ; Unwanted Alex goes to the? Public Biblio, ? where he is attacked by an aged rabble of? vecks? who recognized Alex as the 1 who ruined all the books on crystallography. The constabulary semen and interrupt up the disturbance ; to Alex? s surprise he recognizes two of the millicents. One is Billyboy, his old Nemesis, and the other is Dim, his old droog. They take him out to the state and crush the life out of him ; he can non support himself because of the conditioning.
After waking up from his beat-down, Alex walks to a nearby small town and to a house, with the Home mark on it. He doesn? T know that it is the house of the writer of A Clockwork Orange, but he recognizes Alex and takes attention of him. F. Alexander, the writer and his friends want to do the public aware of the immoralities of this new Ludovico technique. Meanwhile Alex becomes mentally weak, and can non take anymore of this injury, he decides to perpetrate self-destruction. He jumps out of a window, but does non decease? ( 3.169 ; ch.6 ) .
The autumn has somehow cured and freed Alex from the effects of Ludovico? s technique, he has once more become his bad ego once more. He shortly returns to his thug-habits, and a new group of droogs to environ him. Even with his regained freedom, he chooses non to perpetrate? ultra-violence. ? He becomes reacquainted with an old droog who now has a married woman and boy and now wants a married woman and a boy of his ain. Alex through clip has matured from adolescence to maturity.
The novel? s chief theme trades with moral freedom, Anthony Burgess expresses his positions that no affair how? good? one? s actions are, unless one has moral freedom, they are spiritually restricted and oppressed. Burgess chiefly expresses his position and concerns through the chaplain? s duologue, where he is the lone 1 that truly sees through the immoralities of Ludovico? s technique. If one is forced to be good, and they do what is right, it is non out of any ethical or moral strong belief. When 1 is forced what to make, he us simply a tool, or a pawn of the province, a clockwork orange, an zombi, unlike person with the freedom of pick who is an person.
Work Cited ( 1 ) Burgess, Anthony. A Clockwork Orange. New York: Ballantine Books, 1963.
( 2 ) ? A Critical Expression at A Clockwork Orange? , Clark, Cameron B. Feb. 2002. ( 3 ) ? A Clockwork Orange Resucked? , Burgess, Anthony. Feb. 2002. ( 4 ) & # 8220 ; A Clockwork Orange & # 8221 ; . Planet Papers. Feb. 2002. .
