Can One Perceive Or Confirm The Existence

Of An Idea Or Object That Is External To Him Mainly & # 8211 ; God? Essay, Research Paper

Can One Perceive Or Confirm The Existence Of An Idea Or Object That Is External

To Him Mainly & # 8211 ; God?

& # 8220 ; I think hence I am. & # 8221 ; Man wills, refuses, perceives, understands,

and denies many rules. As explained by Rene & # 8217 ; Descartes, adult male is a thought

thing, a witting being who truthfully exists because he is certain that it is

so. All that adult male perceives is internally present and non external to him or his

head. The focal point of the 3rd speculation that must be dealt with is: Can

one perceive or corroborate the being of an thought or object that is external to

him chiefly & # 8211 ; God?

There are three ways, Descartes explains, that one may come to the

decision of an objects being. The first is through nature. The 2nd is

through experiencing an object independent of one & # 8217 ; s will, for illustration ; heat and cold.

The 3rd, and most detailed upon is the point of cause and consequence, or more

merely, the nonsubjective world of an thought. We will chiefly cover with the 3rd

ground of cause and consequence.

Descartes brings some illustrations to show his cause and consequence

theory. More significantly, is the logic that lies behind the existent theory. The

principle that an object will hold an consequence is merely if it stems from a

legitimate cause. A rock, for illustration, can non be perceived accurately if there

International Relations and Security Network & # 8217 ; t an initial thought predating with equal or superior belongingss in one & # 8217 ; s

mind. The head generates thoughts and develops world through old

scheme or beliefs as Descartes provinces:

& # 8220 ; And although an thought may give rise to another thought, this

reasoning backward can non, however, be infinite ; we must in the

terminal range a first thought, the cause of which is, as it were,

the original in which all the world that is found

objectively in these thoughts is contained formally. & # 8221 ;

Additionally, belongingss such as colour, sound, heat, and cold are excessively

composite in their nature for Descarte

s to find whether they are true or

false. In other words, are the thoughts that one has about a belongings true or

faithlessly? Consequently, Descartes concludes that there is a common component between

illustrations like the rock and the cold. The cold portraying the unreal or false

object and the rock as a true object. He contends that they both contain

& # 8220 ; substance & # 8221 ; like adult male himself, and are hence similar.

The lone trouble that arises is the consideration of God & # 8217 ; s being.

There is no substance or thought for the impression of God to arise from. The

valid inquiry that Descartes asks is: Is it imaginable that a finite being

have the thought of an infinite being?

We can understand from Descartes Hagiographas that he believes in a God.

God is ineffably great, ageless, independent, and all knowing. What Descartes

deduces is that the nature of an infinite being can non be comprehended by a

finite being. Subsequently, by the fact that he believes there is a God is

cogent evidence for his being. The thought was placed at that place by an outside factor. He

farther provinces that if adult male is independent of all other being so he has

the possible to make to go infinite. This in bend, lead Descartes to state

that if he was the writer of his ain being and independent of all being,

so he would be God. By that affair, it is all these points jointly that

indicate to Descartes that he is dependent on another being, that is a God.

It can be argued, really briefly, that Descartes averment about God is

somewhat contradictory. As I stated earlier, an object is perceived in the head

every bit long as there are equal or superior belongingss in the head. His rests his

whole statement on the footing that one can non to the full hold on or penetrate the being

of God logically. It is obvious that his perceptual experience is dubious in the first

topographic point. There is a batch more stuff to be covered before I can candidly break up

Descartes & # 8217 ; whole statement, but this is my sentiment on the 3rd speculation.

3ce