Canadian Fur Trade Essay Research Paper Canadian

Canadian Fur Trade Essay, Research Paper

Canadian Fur Trade By: Michael Bell E-mail: mucco100 @ hotmail.com The Fur Trade in Canada is a immense portion of our history and has played a large function in determining us as a state. There are many facets of the Fur Trade that must be looked at to see how Canada has been shaped economically and politically in the past and present. The Fur Trade has besides affected the lives of people who lived during the Fur Trade every bit good as people today through the manner capital has been controlled and distributed within society. We must look at the many facets of the Fur Trade to analyze who has benefited and who has been harmed from its effects. A expression at the rise and autumn of the Fur Trade, and a expression at the economic and political history of Canada will demo who has benefited and who has been harmed. Lashkar-e-taibas begin with the reaching of Cartier one of the first laminitis of the New America to see how the Fur Trade began. The early beginning of the Fur Trade started in the early 16th century. It began with the determination of the great sum of fish along the Bankss of the New America that truly attracted the Europeans to take an involvement. The fishing was so great along the Bankss that the fish would come to you to be caught. & # 8220 ; Teeming with fish which can be taken non merely with the net, but in pails let down with a stone. & # 8221 ; ( Finlay, 1984. pg17 ) The fishing was great but it was non plenty to pull fishermen from Europe to colonise this new land. Cartier who had become associated with the indigens of the land begun to see that they had a great involvement in the goods they had with them. The indigens were smart and knew that the points like boilers and Fe pots were more utile so there ain traditional ways. & # 8220 ; They found that the goods of the Europeans were in many cases preferred to there own. & # 8221 ; ( Patterson. pg. 39. 1972 ) These new points allowed the indigen to hold a more practical manner of cookery and warming H2O so their ain clip devouring method they had. All of the trading in the beginning was really friendly amongst the Native Americans and the Europeans until the thought of capital came into the head of the Europeans for net income. This was the beginning of the trading of pelts for excess amongst the Native Americans and the European. Over clip there was great exhilaration about the New America and what it could supply for Europe, which was capital. During the mid 17th century there was much trading activity in the New America between the Native Americans and the Europeans. & # 8220 ; The period after 1663 was characterized by a rapid enlargement or trade. & # 8221 ; ( Innis. pg 29, 1999 ) This rapid enlargement of trade was the extremum of the Fur Trade in the New America. Europe began to make immense sums of excess like knives, pots, and vesture points to merchandise for pelts from the Native Americans during this enlargement. Trading between the two became really extended, Europeans decided that they wanted to get down to bring forth pelt as a trade good. This meant that they needed pelt in big measures so they could transport it to Europe to be produced into chapeau, coats, and other manufactured goods. Although trade between the two parties was going of import, the Europeans were much more advanced technologically, and began to take advantage of their power. Items that the Europeans used for trade with the Native Americans were non ever fair for what they were having from the Native Americans. & # 8220 ; The pelts that they obtained in return were non needfully of equal worth. Some accommodation of values therefor would hold been required by the Indians to avoid their agony loses. & # 8221 ; ( Ray. pg.69. 1974 ) The chief ground that this sort of unjust trade was go oning was because Europeans felt they were superior and they could work them in many ways. Capital of the pelt was much greater than the points of vesture, guns and other goods were. The Europeans during this clip knew that they could rip off the Native American of their pelt because they would be tricked into believing that what they were acquiring in return for their pelt was just and equal. During the extremum of the Fur trade you see that Native Americans were viewed as non being peers in any manner, there was an unequallness of trade, dealingss, and capital. Another facet of this clip of the Fur Trade and throughout was the dependence of the Native Americans on the Europeans. As mentioned before trading between the Native Americans and Europeans was non ever just. The Europeans would inquire for immense sums of pelts in exchange for their goods. The pelts were deserving much more than the goods they were being traded for, which created immense net incomes and capital for the Europeans. Debt was used so the Europeans could hold power and control over the Native Americans. & # 8220 ; In their efforts to guarantee themselves of a part of the return of future Indian Hunts, the assorted European trading groups gave the Indians ample progresss of goods trusting that they would be able to roll up these debts. & # 8221 ; ( Ray. 1974 pg. 138 ) These debts made the Native Americans dependant on the Europeans. This dependence became so bad that the debt could non be paid back and goods that the Natives were so dependent on would non be given to them any longer unless they went to other viing stations. However, when the Hudson Bay Company monopolized the Native Americans got farther into debt. & # 8220 ; After the Hudson & # 8217 ; s Bay Company became a monopoly in 1821, nevertheless, trappers in debt had no pick but to return to the same station and to likely get farther debts with the Company. & # 8221 ; ( Brizinski. pg.100.1993 ) The Native Americans were so use to the Europeans goods that they began to lose their civilization and their ways of life. Everything that the Native Americans knew became lost in the Europeans ways. Debt created this dependence on the European goods because the Native Americans became so use to the Europeans ways of life that it would be impossible to alter. & # 8220 ; The Indians have been so long accustomed to utilize European goods that it would be with trouble that they could now obtain a support without them. & # 8221 ; ( Innis. pg. 271.1999 ) This dependence created a stigma on the Native Americans for non being able to supply for themselves and be deponent on their ain. How is a civilization like the Native American suppose to trust on their ain ways of life when all of what they have of all time known has been assimilated into a new unknown European civilization. When the Europeans first arrived in the New America the Native American people had no thought of the disease that would come into their people & # 8217 ; s lives. Disease that the Europeans brought over from Europe devastated the Native American people and full folk. & # 8220 ; During the early 1800 & # 8217 ; s, epidemic diseases such as rubeolas, little syphilis, and whooping cough continued to take their toll. & # 8221 ; ( Brizinski 1993 pg.110 ) The Native American people were non use to these new diseases and because they had no manner of bring arounding these diseases, it wiped them out. All of the huntsman and trappers of the folks were all deceasing so there was no manner of bring forthing any pelt to merchandise with. Disease besides caused full households to endure. & # 8220 ; Loss of huntsmans frequently meant famishment for other household members. & # 8221 ; ( Brizinski 1993 pg.110 ) At the terminal of the fur trade full Native American population were wiped out due to the diseases the Europeans brought with them in the beginning. There were many lending factors that led to the autumn of the Fur Trade. With the great demand of fur during 16th and 17th in Europe, pelt began to decrease in North America. The Native Americans had no signifier of income and like mentioned above debt became an progressively large job. & # 8220 ; As fur resources diminished, bands besides accumulated heavy debt. & # 8221 ; ( Brizinski, 1993 pg.110 ) This debt job became so immense at the terminal of the fur trade that the European station had to provide the Native

American tribe with food and other resources. This led as a contributing factor as to what is known today as, welfare. As the furs became increasingly low and the debt of Native Americans on the Europeans increasingly high extreme measures were taken. Native American people began to exploit every resource of fur even if it meant to take from regions that were only used seasonally. “Indians responded to the difficulty conditions by exploiting available food and fur resources as best they could, but this in turn led cynically to over hunting.”(Brizinski 1993 pg.110) The Native American’s at the end of the fur trade took these types of measures because they had no other way of survival. The end of the fur trade signified that the social structure of Native American’s livelihood would be changed forever as they knew It. The lose of all or most of the fur resource’s during that time was seen as a major contributing factor to the end of the fur trade. During the fur trade the Native Americans were not in the same mode of production and because of this, you see that they were not ready for such a drastic change. “A gloomy view of the Indians’ future was a common one in the nineteenth and early twentieth century and has not disappeared yet.”(Patterson 1972 pg. 87) Dependency has a been in the Native American people since the first contact with the Europeans and is still felt today. The Fur trade has also affected the way in which politics have been formed over the past centuries. In the beginning European colonist have always felt superior to the Native American people in the way they live and their beliefs and attitudes. European laws and rules were implemented on the land and the people soon after colonization on the New America. These rules and laws were to their benefit so they would be able to do what they wanted. The Europeans were taking control over the New America in the beginning. “Even before 1876, legislation tried to substitute elected government, on the European model.”(Brizinski 1993 pg.190) This shows that the intention of the Europeans from the beginning was to have total control over all political and economical issues. The Europeans knew that they had to implement the political control over the land and the people in order to control the resources and the people of the New America. Through the control over politic and economics, Europeans began to obtain status that put them higher then the Native Americans. “For Marxist historians, the bourgeoisie is the ruling class that has been arranging man’s exploitation of man for its own benefit.”(Silver 1991 pg. 89) In the past, we see treaties and acts were implemented on the Native American people for their benefit. Many of the treaties and acts that are put in the Native American people are very bias against the Native Americans. We see these types of unfair bias in the way the political government of Canada has treated the Native American people. “The BNA Act is an important legal document in establishing the federal right to make regulations affecting Indians and their lands.”(Brizinski 1993 pg. 155) This types of attitudes have carried on in Canada’s politics and Native Americans are affected greatly from it, past and present. Today we see that the government feels like they are supporting the majority of the Native Americans but society has to see that the fur trade create debt that created dependency of the Native American on the Europeans. The fur trade systematically made the Native Americans become a burden on the government but this only happens due to the government dictating the lives of the Native American people. “They are assuming positions of leadership in organizations, writing and editing books though media giving expressions of their views.”(Patterson 1972 pg.186) Since the beginning of the fur trade, we see that resources are extracted from the land and distributed though out the world and today with a few exception we see the same thing occurring. ” Canada has remained fundamentally a product of Europe.”(Innis 1999 pg. 175) With the way Canada has changed over the last century, it would be wrong to continue the assumption that Canada is still a product of Europe. With the new liberal ideas and government in Canada, it would more accurate that Canada has increasingly become integrated into the American system. The decreasing amount of government intervention in the economy is a representation that Canada is moving away from its community-oriented society. The combination of government ownership, private enterprise in Canada and the diversity of institutions has made this possible. In today’s society, the relationship between these two branches is becoming less integrated. The government is no longer seen as a system that will help the economy but rather as a hindrance upon it. The main goal of private enterprise is to limit the amount of government spending and to increase the amount of tax breaks that industries will receive. The economy may be improving, but at the cost of the middle and lower class, as a result, the rich will get richer and the poor will remain poor or become poorer. Without government intervention and regulation, the poor usually the Native Americans will never be able to pull themselves up into a more respectable life style. The effects of the staple industry are still apparent today, and are still a very large part of the Canadian economy that has continued since the fur trade. Canada has diversified its exports to a small degree, now Canada has one of the largest steel industries in the world. Canada still relies on other countries to invest in and buy Canadian goods to sustain the economy just as they did during the fur trade. “Canada should remain a branch-plant economy with a stake in a continental automotive industry and an export role as resource producer to the world. (Morton 1994 pg. 309) With the current world recovery from the recession of the 70’s and 80’s, Canada will have to find a way to create new techniques to ensure that the economy will not be absorbed into the American economy. The fur trade was the start to the way in which Canada has evolved economically and has stayed relatively the same with resources going out with the Native American people having no say. In conclusion, we see that Native American people have been greatly harmed from the effects of the fur trade. The fur trade made the Native American people dependent on the Europeans and we still see the effects of that today. With a drastic change in social structure and mode of production, the Native American people were not ready to deal with the differences. They were transformed from a hunting gathering society to a mercantile capitalist society in a very short period. Politically and economically the Native American people have not been heard and have not had a say in the way the land is dealt with as well as a voice in government at the higher levels. Native American people have been trying to create their own self-government from the European model government but with little success. The Europeans right from the beginning have always had the upper hand when it came to political and economical power. Bibliography . ] Reference Page Brizinski, Peggy. 1993. Knots in a String. University Extension Press. Canada Finaly, J.L. 1984. The Structure of Canadian History. Prentice-Hall Canada Inc. Innis, Harold A.. 1999. The Fur Trade in Canada. University of Toronto Press: Toronto Buffalo London Morton, Desmond. 1994. A Short History of Canada. Hurtig Publishers Patterson, E. 1972. The Canadian Indian: A History Sinse 1500. Collier Macmillan Canada, Ltd. Ray, Arthur. 1974. Indians in the Fur Trade. University of Toronto Press: Toronto Buffalo Silver, A.L. 1991. An Introduction to Canadian History. Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc. Toronto, Canada