DBQ Muslims V. Christian Merchants Essay Sample
In the beginning of Christianity. trade was considered iniquitous. while the Muslims thought trade was a lesson of grasp and difficult work. Christians had a strongly negative attitude towards the interaction between trade and merchandisers. Muslim people. nevertheless. had assorted different sentiments on trade in comparing to the Christian faith. However. over clip. the ideas on trade and merchandisers shifted to a more negative point of position from both faiths. The sentiments from these faiths were face-to-face at the beginning of clip. but they finally fused into one overall idea and sentiment by the sixteenth century.
From the beginning of clip of the early development of each faith. there were assorted differences between the Christian and Islamic point of position towards trade and merchandisers. which can be displayed in paperss 1 and 2. Document 1 had an in-depth focal point on the negative point of position that Christianity obtained towards trade. It focused on the thought that going a merchandiser was iniquitous and a merchandiser himself was unable to come in into Eden. which agreed consequently to the Christian sentiment on bring forthing money in their society. Furthermore. papers 1 served as a direct statement of how Christians felt towards the topic of constructing an economic system in the faith and in the community ; the Bible was provided as a direct expostulation against trade and merchandisers. largely concentrating on statements that displayed the rich as being corrupted and vain. This statement finally proved how negative the sentiment of the Christian society was on merchandisers between 70-80 CE. Overall. papers 1 provinces that affluent merchandisers were frowned upon and prevented from come ining heaven in the community. which supported the negative prejudice that Christians held. Jesus. the holy leader of the Christian community. was hapless. therefore his negative positions against affluent merchandisers could correlate with his inability to have wealth.
On the other manus. in papers 2. the positions of the Muslim society were presented in a positive mode. Document 2 was a statement from the Qur’an. the holy book of the Islamic community. which believes that a merchandiser who was honest with their mode of trade and performed trade in a faithful mode would be blessed. If the trade that took topographic point was full of honestness and no greed or prevarications. so the Muslim merchandiser would take a higher rank in the community with the “martyrs of religion. ” ( 2 ) Merchants in the Islamic community were perceived as
a positive sort of wealth and would take high rank in the spiritual universe. Trade and merchandisers for the Muslims was represented as a signifier of honestness and truth. Furthermore. papers 2 references how God himself has a positive mentality on an honest and faithful usage of trade. In this community. merchandisers have a high rank and are above regular citizens because of this approval from God. However. the Qur’an could be biased because the author of the Qur’an had the nonsubjective to beef up the Islamic capital to do the imperium richer.
If the spiritual point of position consisted of a charitable mentality on trade and merchandisers was adopted. so the merchandisers would be directed to the strengthening of the imperium through trade. Even though both paperss 1 and 2 provide a distinguishable sentiment and point of position on trade and merchandisers in their societies. extra paperss would be needed to beef up their opinionative statements. A merchandiser who has no direct correlativity to these faiths. or who is a portion of another faith. could supply an of import penetration through paperss such as entries in a diary on what merchandisers really receive when trading. These types of paperss would back up grounds in relation to how of import faith was in the state of affairss merchandisers were in. how affluent merchandisers really were. and their fidelity and honestness. In the earlier clip periods. Christian sentiments on merchandisers and trade were perceived as negative. while Muslims positions were positive. They had opposite point of positions and opposite sentiments on how of import trade really was.
In paperss 3. 4. and 5. the sentiments on trade and merchandisers in the Christian and Islamic societies changed in a figure of ways over clip in the in-between clip period of the rise of both faiths. Document 3 was recorded much later in 1170 and discussed statements made from Godric. a merchandiser who had a life written about himself by his co-worker. The papers discusses the importance of honestness in merchandisers. particularly Godric himself. It besides discusses how going a merchandiser focuses on difficult work and labour. which allows them to develop an grasp for the objects they interact with in trade. In comparing with the earlier clip period. papers 3 besides portrays a negative point of position on trade in the Christian community. Godric. the Christian merchandiser. was so ashamed of his wealth and everything he owned that he gave them to the hapless even though he worked for them so unfalteringly. Because of his negative positions that he developed refering the wealth he obtained. he gave his ownerships to the hapless in order to counterbalance for his wickednesss. He still held the fright of non being accepted into heaven because of his wealth and because of his actions towards trade.
Document 3 was utile in stand foring how far merchandisers will travel to do up for their black yesteryear in hopes of enjoying their faith. Because of the actions Godric displayed. the sentiment of a negative point of position towards trade and merchandisers stays the same during this clip period in Christianity. The co-worker of Godric who was the writer of this papers could’ve had a colored point of position. nevertheless. because of his relationship to Godric as a friend and co-worker. The statements referenced about the life of Godric could hold been overdone because of his colleague’s sentiments and positions on Godric’s life. In papers 4. which was a papers concentrating on Christianity about 100 old ages after papers 3 was written and took topographic point in 1273. the position on trade shifted to statements refering how trading was improper and unfair if it’s non fair on both sides. It’s of import to recognize that the papers isn’t written from a holy leader or for a holy leader. but from a theologian. He makes assorted statements refering the moralss of adult male and how a adult male “should non sell what is non his. ” ( 4 )
This doesn’t provide much grounds about the spiritual positions Christians had refering merchandisers during this clip period. The merely spiritual statement in papers 4 discusses the morality of adult male. which is neither positive nor negative in relation to merchandise and merchandisers in the Christian community. Ultimately. this papers can non be considered colored because Thomas Aquinas has no blazing spiritual sentiment in the papers. His sentiment was impersonal and doesn’t support or show an grounds for the Christian society. Document 5. a papers refering an Muslim tribunal determination. depicts trade and merchandisers in a negative visible radiation. which contrasts with the positive Islamic point of position on economic interaction in papers 2. As clip progressed. the Islamic sentiments on trade seemed to switch drastically on a wholly opposite point of view. This papers was recorded in the fourteenth century and focused largely on the negative facets of shopkeepers in the Muslim society. Shopkeepers were described as being stripped from manfulness and holding a weak virtuousness.
The papers describes a strongly negative point of position on the place of trade and merchandisers in the Muslim community through these assorted abuses and statements. They were described as dishonorable people who focused merely on having a net income and gaining wealth. Furthermore. papers 5 provides negative point of views on the shopkeepers because of their end to seek for net income. Another papers that would be required to beef up the grounds needed to back up the Islamic point of views and expose their sentiment would be the diary of an Islamic merchandiser. Through these journal entries. a personal enquiry on how the merchandisers viewed the spiritual community would be attained. Overall. paperss 3 and 4 both have similar negative point of views on trade and merchandiser activity. The Christian point of view remained unchanged. nevertheless. the Muslim point of view changed wholly. Document 5 focused on the negative sentiments that Muslim bookmans have on merchandisers and shopkeepers. which contrast wholly to their earlier sentiments. Documents 3 and 4 are besides negative. but remain unchanged in the Christian society. whereas the Muslim point of view changed over clip.
Documents 6 and 7 both acknowledge a positive displacement of sentiment on the attitudes towards trade and merchandisers in the Christian and Islamic societies at the terminal of the rise of the religion’s clip period. Document 6 largely focuses on beef uping the spiritual capital to function the holy occupants of the community. It discusses that wealth is distributed by God and should be treated as a approval and honored. These letters to and from Italian merchandisers contrasts other paperss with a positive mentality on merchandisers alternatively of a negative mentality. The point of position in papers 6 is really evidentiary and supportive because the letters are from the merchandisers themselves. The letters besides portion the same belief that charitable wealth should be distribute among the society through assorted ways. such as spiritual pictures or wall paintings to assist beef up the society as a whole.
Document 7 was an Muslim tribunal determination made in the seventeenth century against a Muslim merchandiser. It displays the attitudes of Islamic people to redistribute affluent properties amongst themselves. Furthermore. in papers 7. a merchandiser was mentioned named Sakaoglu Nasuh who took net income for personal addition that he obtained from cotton. This shows how the Islamic citizens would take another man’s ownerships. but redistribute it to assist beef up the full community. Both document 6 and document 7. stand foring both faiths. expose a displacement in the point of position of both faiths in a positive facet associating to merchandisers and trade. every bit long as the merchandisers were just and shared their net incomes among the community. Another papers needed that would profit the grounds needed to beef up the sentiments of both faiths would be a tribunal determination made by the Christian community every bit good. associating to the pattern of a Christian merchandiser in order to compare or contrast the similarities or differences. This would let two similar tribunal determinations to be able to be compared to in order to decode a valid sentiment. which could be possible in a political manner.
Overall. all of the paperss displayed the differences of the point of positions between Christianity and Islam. Document 1 introduced Christianity as holding a negative position on merchandisers. where papers 2 compared the Christian sentiment to the positive sentiment that Muslims had on trade every bit long as it was honorable and just. Furthermore. paperss 3 and 4 both represented the negative sentiments that Christianity still held on shopkeepers as clip went by. In papers 5. the negative facets of shopkeepers were shown. but the positive mode they experienced in earlier clip periods in Islamic history displays the alteration of sentiment the Muslim community had over clip on trade and merchandisers.
Last. papers 6 displayed the alteration in the Christian community’s sentiments towards economic interaction by holding a positive mentality on merchandisers giving back to the society as a whole in signifiers of assorted objects. such as pictures. This papers relates to document 7. which was a determination made by the Islamic tribunal. which described the guiltiness of a Muslim merchandiser because he didn’t administer his net income to the community. but kept it for himself. Both paperss show the displacement in point of position over clip in a positive manner. The paperss represent the negative mentality on trade over clip. while the Islamic community had positions that shifted over clip. Muslim positions began positively and ended negatively. but finished with a positive mentality. However. both the Christian and Islamic faith shared their displacement in attitudes and sentiments over clip from the beginning of the faiths to the sixteenth century.
