Dual Executive Essay Research Paper 101096

Dual Executive Essay, Research Paper

10/10/96

Dual Executive

The thought of an elected caput of province for the American head executive, in its construct, was virtually without case in point. The thought of an American double presidential term, split between domestic and foreign sphere is itself without case in point. A double presidential term would accommodate America good due to the force per unit areas of the office of President of the United States. As Commander-in-Chief, the President bears unbelievable force per unit areas and duties. The President non merely has power in the United States, but besides enormous influence throughout the universe. It is non chesty to alter the presidential term in order to pull off America s huge involvements all over the Earth. The US is surely non isolationistic any longer, so making an office for a foreign personal businesss executive is merely realistic. Therefore, the President is non merely lacerate between domestic and foreign duties, but s/he must happen clip to run. A double presidential term with a domestic and foreign leader could split these runing responsibilities. In add-on, a double presidential term is better adapted to manage coincident crises. A double presidential term is a modern twenty-four hours reply to the worlds of the American presidential term.

Basically, the thought of a double executive is rooted in the construct of a plural

executive. Back in the clip of the authorship of the Constitution, some anti-federalists wanted a weak executive. This weak executive was called a plural executive or an executive council. ( Storing 49 ) The intent of such a plural executive was non merely to weaken the executive, but besides to forestall a monarchy from governing. In fact, an anti-federalist named Randolph opposed an executive-of-one so much that he believed it to be the fetus ( foetus ) of the monarchy. ( Storing 93 ) Yet today the menace of monarchy is absurd.

The proposed double executive has no purposes of weakening that subdivision. Rather, a double executive makes the subdivision more efficient, focused, and in touch.

Plural is non a fitting term for the double executive. This is because a plural executive implies several office holders, or a commission. The more people, the more pandemonium and disunity occurs.

In the seventieth chapter of The Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton made a instance for an executive with a great trade of integrity. If power was concentrated in a individual head magistrate, so the subdivision would be more cohesive. Hamilton relied on the failures of plural executive in the history of Rome and Greece to do a instance against executive councils.

Some may reason that by spliting the executive office, it saps the energy and energy required of the occupation. Inversely, it can be argued that the President has so much to make that his energy is weakened by merely being spread excessively thin. The latter is true since America is such an

unbelievable universe power. When Hamilton was composing against a plural executive, he ne’er could hold predicted America s function in the universe.

An illustration of what this double executive is non, is Uruguay s multi-member presidential term. From 1918 to 1933 the straight elected nine-member National Council of

Administration shared executive power with the President. The Council took attention of domestic personal businesss. Note that there is a divide between domestic and foreign responsibilities.

Such a presidential term was intended to be more representative, but merely made the authorities more disconnected. Within clip, Uruguay s multi-member presidential term fell to a dictator because it was an ineffective entity. There were merely excessively many members. That is why this double presidential term is composed of merely two members of the same party who would run together, and regulation together.

The proposed double presidential term is rather united. The occupation of the President has expanded, and so should the office. A double presidential term should

be thought of as an extension of the individual presidential term.

These two leaders would run together in elections under the same party. Both would hold the same four twelvemonth footings, with two term bounds. The thought is that the presidential term is still one entity. It is the same occupation as a individual executive, but the duty is thinned out. Each measure, pact, or assignment would be approved by both Presidents. Some measures, pacts, and

assignments could impact both Presidents, which is why double blessing is necessary. Such

safeguards must be taken to keep integrity in the executive subdivision.

Both the domestic and the executive President would take a vice-president. Basically four people would stop up running under one party. Other than that, the presidential election procedure would stay the same.

Meanwhile, the impeachment procedure should use merely to the single wrongdoer. One President can non assist it if the other committed an impeachable discourtesy.

The other should non be punished for it. The vice-president for the individual who was impeached would make full the office in that state of affairs. After the vice-president, the sequence procedure would stay the same.

The foreign personal businesss President would be the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces in actions abroad. Yet, the domestic President could utilize the armed forces on American dirt for natural catastrophe alleviation, or whatever else it is used for today. In add-on, the Presidents would besides hold the power to allow respites and forgivenesss. Both actions are capable to double blessing.

When differences arise between the two Presidents, the issue would be officially put in authorship. The issue could so be put before a two-thirds house ballot for blessing. The house would be the Presidential go-between. In the curse of office, the Presidents should be reminded that they are non supposed to be working against each other, but working together.

Both Presidents would give a State of the Union reference. The domestic reference would be more of a sum-up of the province of the Union. Meanwhile the foreign reference would be about the province of the Union in relation to the remainder of the universe.

The foreign President would have embassadors and other public curates. Meanwhile the domestic President would be to run into with province Governors, members

of Congress, and so forth. Any state of affairss that fall in between those two classs should be addressed by both Presidents.

One particular power the domestic President would hold would be that of put uping Judgess to the Supreme Court. The foreign President s blessing would non be necessary. Therefore, the concluding blessing for the Judgess would be carried out the traditional manner.

The cabinet would be divided along presidential lines, and would be appointed by the corresponding President. The domestic President would necessitate the Attorney-General, Postmaster-General, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Labor. The foreign President would necessitate the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Commerce. Both would portion the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, and other Secretaries as needed.

One good facet of holding a double presidential term is that it may take some of the media s scrutiny off the office. In other words, it may displace the incrimination. Yet, by interrupting up the focal point, the personality and personal appeal of a President would go less of an issue. It must be kept in head that this is merely guess.

In decision, turning the presidential term into two halves of a whole would relieve some of the huge duties of being leader of the universe s largest world power. Hamilton was right that the executive needs integrity. Yet unlike Hamilton s positions, the presidential term can be divided, and kept a harmonious organic structure.