European Economic And Monetary Union Essay Research

European Economic And Monetary Union Essay, Research Paper

The Economic and Monetary Union ( EMU ) is a individual currency country within the European Union in which people, goods, services and capital move without limitation ( Europa Quest ( 1 ) , 2001 ) . Imperative to the success of the EMU is the execution of a individual European currency, the Euro, and the application of specific macro-economic policies by the EMU member provinces ( Harris, 1999: 78 ) . Furthermore, it is the foreseeable purpose of European authoritiess to make a model for stableness, peace and prosperity through the publicity of structural alteration and regional development ( JP Morgan, 2001 ) . This essay will endeavour to foreground the fundamental additions likely to be accrued by the European concern community as a consequence of EMU policy commissariats. The developments and fortunes predating the EMU formation will be examined to give penetration into the operation of a pecuniary brotherhood. Furthermore, it is indispensable to analyse the deductions the EMU has for houses within both & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; and other European states.

To set up a strong apprehension of the elaboratenesss of the EMU, it is indispensable to discourse both the ancestors and major developments in this pecuniary brotherhood. The beginnings of the EMU can be traced to the formation of the European Coal and Steel community ( ECSC ) in the early 1950s, which was the first effort to tackle European economic integrity to accomplish greater international fight ( Per Jacobson, 1999 ) ( Duisenberg, 1998 ) . The success of this venture prompted the foreign curates of six ECSC states to analyze the possibility of farther economic integrating ( Chulalongkorn University, 1999 ) . Hence, in 1957 one the most important understandings in European economic sciences history, The Treaty of Rome, was signed. The Treaty of Rome & # 8217 ; s cardinal end was to supply for the creative activity of a common market ( Kenwood & A ; Lougheed, 1999:280 ) . The most important facet of this pact was the committedness made by such states as Belgium, France, West Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Luxembourg to ease the free motion of goods, services and factors of production. Basically, these European authoritiess sought to extinguish internal trade barriers, create common external duties and harmoniousnesss member provinces Torahs and ordinances ( Hill, 2001: 233 ) . This motion towards a common European market continued with comparative success until the late sixtiess. During this period, the Bretton-Woods Exchange Rate Regime had begun to exhibit unmistakable defects, whilst planetary rising prices was dismaying high. In add-on, the reappraisal of the German Deustchemark and the devaluation of the Gallic Franc, created considerable exchange rate volatility within Europe ( Barber, 1999 ) . It was a common held belief amongst many member provinces, that Europe & # 8217 ; s ability to vie within the planetary economic system hinged on the debut of a individual currency ( 500 & # 8217 ; Estaing, 1997 ) . Hence, in 1970 the Werner Committee was established to decide the most efficient agencies to meet economic public presentation and currencies ( Harris, 1999:76 ) . The Werner Report proposed a three-stage procedure for accomplishing a complete pecuniary brotherhood within a decennary. The concluding end would be the free motion of capital, the lasting lockup of exchange rates and the eventual replacing of the EC6 nations notes and coins with a individual currency ( Barber, 1999 ) . The commission proposed a complete European Monetary Union by 1980, nevertheless the failure of the Smithsonian Agreement, the subsequent debut of a floating exchange rate government and the ill-famed Oil Price Shocks of the 70s, caused the programs outlined by the Werner Committee to be abandoned ( Harris, 1999:79 ) . In retrospect, the enterprises of the EMU were bold sing the fickle economic clime of the 1970s ( Kenwood and Lougheed, 1999:310 ) . Yet, even in this period of economic uncertainness, EC member & # 8217 ; s still persued the construct of European Unity ( Princeton Economics, 1998 ) . In 1979, the European Monetary System ( EMS ) was established to further a greater stableness between member province & # 8217 ; s currencies and stronger coordination and convergence of economic policies ( Europa Quest ( 1 ) , 2001 ) . The EMS consisted of four chief constituents, the European Currency Unit ( ECU ) , The Exchange Rate Mechanism ( ERM ) , The Financial Support Mechanism ( FSM ) and the European Monetary Cooperation Fund ( EMCF ) ( Harris, 1999: 80 ) . The ERM was at the & # 8216 ; bosom & # 8217 ; of the EMS and provided for & # 8220 ; fixed but adjustable & # 8221 ; exchange rates between states, whereby currencies could travel within certain borders or fluctuations. When bounds were breached the responsible governments were required to enforce appropriate policy steps ( Europa Quest ( 1 ) , 2001 ) . The EMS enjoyed considerable success during the 1980s, take downing rising prices rates in the EC and easing the inauspicious fiscal effects of the planetary exchange rate fluctuations ( Chulalongkorn University, 1999 ) . The most debatable facet of the EMS was that it held no true sovereignty over member provinces, instead these states still maintained liberty over currencies and macro-economic policies ( Harris, 1999 ; 80 ) . To rectify this systems insufficiency, Jacques Delors, the President of the European Commission, issued the Cockfield Report, which sought to specify the current position of the European markets and set up the right means for implementing a pecuniary brotherhood ( Chulalongkorn University, 1999 ) . Delors identified the greatest challenges confronting the EC, which were ;

1. The riddance of non-tariff barriers had non been achieved as specified under the Treaty of Rome. Alternatively, EC member provinces had begun to use such steps as Value Added Taxes ( VAT ) , environmental Torahs, subsidies and hard proficient criterions to besiege established guidelines and protect domestic industry.

2. The turning laterality of the US and Japan, required Europe to economically and politically incorporate in order to efficaciously vie.

3. Undertaking a conjunct and structured effort at implementing a individual currency was imperative.

( Harris, 1999:70-71 )

In 1987, the Single European Act was passed, based upon the recommendations outlined in the Cockfield Report ( Chulalongkorn University, 1999 ) . This paper outlined a comprehensive plan of 282 steps to be implemented to accomplish a individual market and the timetable, which must be adhered to guarantee the actions success ( Harris, 1999:71 ) . The Single European Act intended to hold a individual market in topographic point by 1993. It proposed the remotion of all frontier controls between EC states, the application of the rule of common acknowledgment to merchandise criterions and unfastened public procurance to non-national providers. In add-on, the Act purported the demand to raise barriers in the EC & # 8217 ; s retail banking and insurance industry, the riddance of limitations on foreign exchange minutess and the abolishment of the restrictions on cabotage ( Hill, 2001:235-236 ) . Pivotal to the Single European Act & # 8217 ; s execution was the significant resignation by member provinces of their economic liberty to the European System of Central Banks ( ESCB ) . The ESCB would presume duty for organizing macro-economic policies ( peculiarly pecuniary ) . Basically, it was the primary function of the ESCB to repair internal exchange rates to the individual currency ( the Euro ) , control foreign militias, involvement and rising prices rates ( Harris, 1999:82 ) . This existent motion of the EC towards a individual currency, was hampered by the failure of the Delors Report to set up the economic criterions which the EC member provinces must accomplish in order to guarantee convergence into one concern rhythm ( Barber, 1999 ) . In 1993, The Treaty of Maastricht expanded upon the Single European Act, chiefly set uping a timetable for the execution of the individual currency and most significantly the convergence standards to be reached by those states go uping into the EMU ( Princeton Economics, 1998 ) . The Maastricht Convergence Criteria is an indispensable component of the EMU construction, as it sets five lower limit economic science demands, which must be met in order to guarantee rank ( JP Morgan, 2001 ) . An go uping state & # 8217 ; s rising prices must be no higher than 1.5 % above the norm for the three EU members with last rates during the old twelvemonth, bespeaking monetary value stableness must be within an economic system ( Harris, 1999:85 ) . A prospective EMU member province should besides see long run involvement rates no higher than 2 % above the three EU members with the lowest rates during the old twelvemonth ( Heller, 1997 ) . The exchange rates of each economic system must hold besides been in the normal set ( ie. + or & # 8211 ; 2.25 % ) of the ERM for 2 old ages without devaluing ( Antwelleer, 2001 ) . Those sing at hand rank should besides expose financial prudence or instead the economic system should non see a budget shortage, which exceeds 3 % of its GDP ( Harris, 1999: 85 ) . Finally, it is indispensable that national debt does non transcend 60 % of GDP ( JP Morgan, 2001 ) . These rigorous economic criterions guarantee that all states runing under the individual currency could be brought to the same place of the concern rhythm. If all member states are sing similar economic conditions, it is possible for the ESCB to order unvarying pecuniary and discretional financial policy ( Urken, 1997 ) . The concluding understanding which of effect to the development of the EMU, is the constitution of the Stability and Growth Pact ( Harris, 1999:85 ) . This agreement was initiated in 1996 at the Dublin Summit of the European Council, set uping a set of regulations associating to currency and budgetary subjects for states within & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; . Basically, this policy treaty decrees that all EMU members must keep the Maastricht Criteria and defines possible enforcement mechanisms ( Salmon, 2000:23-26 ) . Specifically, the Stability and Growth Pact states those conditions under which EMU members have the right to transcend the set public debt to GDP ratio. Should authorization non be granted, member provinces make a compulsory sedimentation, which shall be convertible into a all right 2 old ages subsequently ( Per Jacobson, 1999 ) . The Treaty of Maastricht besides outlined the timetable of events, which are scheduled to happen if the individual currency will be to the full operational by 2002. Stages One and Two, were completed between 1990 and 1999, supplying the foundations for the at hand success of the Euro. During this period, the Single European Market was completed, all ERM members entered narrow exchange rate sets, member provinces initiated policies which conformed with Maastricht specifications and the ESCB was created to implement pecuniary policy for EMU ( Harris, 1999:84 ) . May 1998 marked the deadline for rank offers to those states that had proven their conformity with the Maastricht Convergence Criteria. Belgium, Germany, France, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Portgual and Finland all entered the EMU, with Greece being granted rank in January 2001 ( Europa ( 4 ) , 2001 ) . From January 1999, the Euro became the official currency the EMU, which ensured from that point frontward all foreign exchange operations and new public debt was issued in Euros. On January 1st 2002, Euro coins and bills will travel into circulation and in March 2002 it is the purpose of EMU governments to call off national currencies as a agency of exchange ( Antweller, 2001 ) . The development of the EMU has so been a long and involved procedure crossing 50 old ages, yet it will undeniably give benefits for concern within & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; and have considerable deductions for the concern communities in other European states.

The & # 8216 ; Eurozone & # 8217 ; concern community is likely to roll up a figure of benefits from the execution of the EMU, doing the drawn-out nature of its development instead moneymaking. The EMU facilitates the motion of goods, services, people and capital through the development of a individual European currency and the remotion of barriers to intra-community trade ( Roubini, 1997 ) . Basically, European concerns are being given the chance to work the liberalisation of cross-border controls, which had antecedently diminished their ability to merchandise within Europe ( Harris, 1999:94 ) . European houses will happen it easier to entree the 12 & # 8216 ; Eurozone & # 8217 ; markets, making an chance to present new or modified merchandises for each member provinces, or instead to supply a standardised set of goods and services for & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; ( Harris, 1999: 94 ) . The EMU & # 8217 ; s development besides facilitates those companies who seek to deduce the competitory advantage of factors of production inherent in some member provinces ( Hill, 2001:133 ) . The greater motion of capital and labour allows houses to set up different facet of their concern operations throughout the & # 8216 ; Eurozone & # 8217 ; ( e.g. Research and development in Germany and production in Spain ) ( Harris, 1999:94 ) . The committedness of the EMU governments to take downing conveyance cost specifically the abolishment of limitations on cabotage, allows & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; houses to develop more efficient channel to administer goods and services throughout Europe ( Duisenberg, 1998 ) . Fiscal markets have besides undergone considerable liberalisation throughout the EMU development, ensuing in the remotion of barriers, which had limited cross-border adoption. This committedness to cut downing fiscal barriers, will guarantee & # 8216 ; Eurozone & # 8217 ; houses have cheap entree to finance in all EMU member provinces ( Duisenber

g, 1998 ) . The apogee of greater merchandise pick, increased motions of factors of production, enhanced channels of distribution and a more liberalized fiscal market, warrants ‘Eurozone’ houses will be runing in a extremely dynamic, ambitious and ever-expanding market place. Inevitably, this will excite the EMU to go a extremely competitory economic community. Presently, intra-community trade histories 60 % of member provinces international exchanges, a figure which is likely to turn with the success of the EMU ( de Silguy, 1997 ) . It is foreseeable that ab initio ‘Euroland’ houses may endure under the force per unit area of such intense competition, nevertheless long run efficiency additions are likely to develop amongst EMU houses guaranting their length of service ( Salvatore, 1998:283 ) . The development of the EMU and the subsequent remotion of exchange rate, trade and administrative barriers, will enourage houses to seek strategic confederations and articulation ventures ( Harris, 1999:84 ) . Furthermore, it is expected the brotherhood of houses could ease the sharing of rational belongings, research and development, capital and labor techniques, making greater operational efficiency and bettering both the houses competitiveness within the ‘Eurozone’ and international markets ( Antweller, 2001 ) . It was a common held sentiment amongst European concern leaders, that political and economic integrating was necessary to guarantee to ability of European houses to vie with transnational US and Nipponese companies ( Barber, 1999 ) . It has been argued the key to disputing the economic strength of the Japan, and US is the realisation of strong domestic competition ( Salmon, 2000 ) . The remotion of barriers between ‘Euroland’ states will let domestic competition to escalate, which will do the development of houses who possess the ability to vie successfully in international trade ( Europa Quest ( 3 ) , 2001 ) . The full integrating of the Euro into the EMU as a medium of exchange, will besides extinguish foreign exchange hazard house engaged in international trade are exposed to. Firms merchandising within “Euroland’ will no longer hold to factor foreign exchange fluctuations into their net income borders, supplying even greater inducement for market entry of big houses and giving little to medium sized houses the assurance to originate a more planetary scheme ( Tett, 1996 ) ( Europa Quest ( 3 ) , 2001 ) . The ESCB control of pecuniary policy forecasts involvement rates within some EMU member provinces to fall to historically low degrees. This creates an environment for growing and enlargement within the economic system, stimulated by high adoption and positive concern sentiments ( Martin, 1997 ) . It is without inquiry, the development of the EMU will hold some negative deduction for ‘Euroland’ houses. Most significantly, European house will hold to bear the considerable fiscal cost involved in doing their operations ‘euro- ready’ . That is, equipment and package will necessitate to be converted, labour will necessitate preparation and new processs for covering with the Euro demand to be implemented ( Europa Quest ( 3 ) , 2001 ) . The fiscal industry will hold to set about the greatest load as foreign exchange, bond, equities and managed fund minutess will now wholly be carried out in Euros ( Solomon, 1999 ) . There are besides considerable deductions for contract jurisprudence, as a consequence of the development of the EMU. Whilst, the Principle of Continuity of Contracts prevents any one-sided efforts to utilize the debut of the Euro as a premiss for call offing or non fulfilling contract agreements, it is inevitable that contract would go complex with the execution of the new currency ( Europa Quest ( 2 ) , 2001 ) . Arguably, the greatest drawback of the EMU for member provinces, is the loss of national liberty or instead the ability to exert pick of pecuniary and financial policy ( Antweller, 2001 ) . Of peculiar effect, is the decreasing function of national authoritiess, who can no longer rely on financial or pecuniary policy platforms as a agency of election, because they are constrained by EMU economic guidelines ( Heller, 1997 ) . States such as Finland, Italy and Spain are historically prone to asymmetric labour market dazes, which induce high unemployment. Fiscal policy can no longer be utilized as a direct targeting instrument within ‘Euroland’ , therefore member provinces may get down to exhibit marks of political and economic confusion ( Soltwedel, Dohse and Krieger-Boden, 2000 ) . The ‘Eurozone’ concern community may besides be capable to inordinate examination of commercial patterns, as a consequence of the EMU development. This increased surveillance stems from the EMU’s purpose to protect consumers throughout this dynamic period within Europe, nevertheless this will necessarily raise the dealing costs faced by the concern community ( Europa Quest ( 2 ) , 2001 ) . The cost confronting ‘Euroland’ houses are significant, yet this new founded economic community will certainly give far greater benefits for its participants and guarantee the EMU establishes a dominant presence in planetary markets.

The EMU will bring forth alone benefits for & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; houses, nevertheless the deductions for other concern communities within Europe are complex. The consequence of the EMU on the & # 8216 ; non-Eurozone & # 8217 ; states of Europe can be viewed from 2 positions ; that of those states who have chosen non to fall in the EMU and those who are seeking Ascension into the EMU. The United Kingdom & # 8217 ; s absence from the EMU has been a well-publicized and extremely debated subject in Britain ( BBC, 1998 ) . The UK and Denmark exercised an & # 8216 ; opt-out & # 8217 ; from the EMU, mentioning the demand to do an independent determination on the Ascension issue ( Harris, 1999: 91 ) . Each state possesses the economic stableness and prosperity to run into the Maastricht Convergence Criteria, nevertheless at the deadline for rank in 1998, they felt their economic systems were non ready for the dynamic and ambitious nature of the EMU ( Europa Quest ( 2 ) , 2001 ) . Many feel that is imperative to the success of the organisation that the UK articulation, as they will be required to counter-balance the inevitable efforts to rule by France and Germany ( Princeton Economics, 1998 ) . The reluctance of the UK to follow the Euro will doubtless hold branchings for the British economic system, peculiarly attesting itself in the signifier of intense currency force per unit area. To avoid exchange rate fluctuations, the UK & # 8217 ; s cardinal pecuniary authorization will necessitate to enforce a really strong fiscal policy. These currency fluctuations and tight pecuniary policy are likely to expose UK houses to greater exchange rate hazard and higher adoption costs severally ( Europa Quest ( 2 ) , 2001 ) . The care of the lb as a national currency will besides restrict UK house & # 8217 ; s ability to accrue the efficiency additions through intra-community competition, which their Euroland opposite numbers will see, therefore they will non be able to vie as successfully in international trade ( Princeton economic, 1998 ) . Alternatively, the reluctance of the UK to encompass full economic integrating into Europe, may turn out to be a extremely successful protectionist step of UK houses, should the Euro non bring forth the economic additions expected ( BBC, 1998 ) . Most other European states seeking Ascension into the EMU, are states by and large perceived to hold less developed economic systems ( Europa Quest ( 1 ) , 2001 ) . Detailed dialogues are presently taking topographic point over the possible rank of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey ( IMF, 2000 ) . It is of import to observe, that prior to the development of the EMU many of these states pegged their currencies to either the Deustchemark or the Franc, furthermore they will now irrevocably repair their exchange rate to the Euro ( Europa Quest ( 3 ) , 2001 ) . This infers any big fluctuations in the Euro, will hold dire effects for these developing economic systems ( Per Jacobson, 1999 ) . The end of European Union Ascension has become the cardinal drive force behind the monolithic accommodation and reform attempts in these states. Should these LDC & # 8217 ; s be successful with their EU enterprises, the chances of subsequent currency integrating seems high, guaranting that such economic systems may good accomplish future economic stableness and prosperity ( IMF, 2000 ) . It is indispensable to retrieve that entry into the EMU is an amazing undertaking for most of these states. Furthermore it is questionable whether houses will genuinely profit from the net additions of Ascension, whether the rigorous convergence standards is to ambitious and whether adhering to the Maastricht timetable is excessively greater force per unit area for the concern community to bear ( IMF, 2000 ) . EMU members will besides necessitate to supply a strong committedness to continuing the built-in values of the pecuniary brotherhood, when negociating Ascension. That is, states seeking rank within the EMU should makes warrants of democracy, the regulation of jurisprudence, human rights and protection of minorities as lower limit demands to entry, which would except many prospective states from fall ining & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; .

This essay has endeavored to show the cardinal economic additions likely to be experienced by the & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; concern community with the development of the EMU. Improvements in domestic house & # 8217 ; s efficiency, increases international fight, reduced foreign exchange hazards, entree to larger fiscal markets and the use of strategic confederations and joint ventures are likely to happen under the EMU model and accrue considerable benefits to & # 8216 ; Euroland & # 8217 ; houses. The cost of implementing the EMU to member provinces concern communities are significant, including the fiscal outgos involved in doing concern communities & # 8216 ; euro-ready & # 8217 ; , contractual jobs, loss of financial and pecuniary liberty and inordinate examination of concern patterns. Whilst the execution of the EMU will stay slightly of a combative issue, it is copiously evident that & # 8216 ; Eurozone & # 8217 ; houses will deduce a net benefits from the application of this pecuniary brotherhood. Furthermore, the long and involved procedure of implementing the Electromagnetic unit policy model has possibly ensured a more efficient theoretical account of economic integrating has eventually been developed.

& # 183 ; Antweller, Werner, 2001. European Monetary Union and the Euro. www.pacific.commerce.ubc.ca. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Barber, Lionel. 1999. Puting the Phase for the Single Currency. www.eurunion.org. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; BBC, 1998. How Will EMU Affect Consumers, www.bbc.co.uk. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Chulalongkorn University, 1999. The European Monetary Unit. www.geocities.com/wallstreet/floor/4621/emu-chu.html. Visited March 2001.

& # 183 ; D & # 8217 ; Estaing, Val ry Giscard, 1997. Economic and Monetary Union: The Making of A Currency. www.europa.eu.int. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; De Silguy, Yves-Thibault, 1997. The Impact of the Creation of the Euro on Financial Markets. www.europa.eu.int. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Duisenberg, William, 1999. The Per Jacobson Lecture: The Past Present and Future of Economic Integration. www.imf.org. Visited March 2001.

& # 183 ; Duisenberg, William, 1998. The Euro and the Process of European Integration. www.ecb.int. Visited March 2001.

& # 183 ; Europa Quest ( 1 ) , 2001. The Euro in our Society. www.europa.eu.int. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Europa Quest ( 2 ) , 2001. The Economic and Monetary Union. www.europa.eu.int. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Europa Quest ( 3 ) , 2001. EMU-The Effects. www.europa.eu.int. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Europa Quest ( 4 ) , 2001. The Timetable of Events. www.europa.eu.int. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Harris, Neil, 1999. European Business ( Second Edition ) , Macmillan Press: Basingstoke.

& # 183 ; Heller, Robert, 1997. World Position: Euro to Go. www.princetoneconomics.com. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Hill, Charles, 2001. Global Business ( International Edition ) . Irwin, McGraw Hill: Sydney.

& # 183 ; IMF, 2000. World Economic Mentality: Accession of Transition Economies to the European Union: Prospects and Pressures. www.imf.org. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; JP Morgan, 2001. EMU Factsheet. www.jpmorgan.com/emu. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Kenwood and Lougheed, 1999. The Growth of the International Economy: 1820-2000. Routledge Press: London.

& # 183 ; Martin, Peter, 1997. EMU & # 8217 ; s New Horizon. www.stern.nyu.edu/nroubini/EMU/ . Visited Mach 2001.

& # 183 ; Preston Robert, 1997. Note of Confusion on Single Currency. www.princetoneconomics.com. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Princeton Economics, 1998. State Analysis: United Kingdom. www.princetoneconomics.com. Visted April 2001.

& # 183 ; Roubini, Nouriel, 1997. Notes on Europe, the Euro and EMU. www.stern.nyu.edu/nroubini/EMU. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Salmon, Pierre, 2000. Decentralization and Supernationality: The Case of the EU. www.imf.org. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Salvatore, Dominick, 1998. International Economics ( Sixth Edition ) . Prentice Hall: New Jersey.

& # 183 ; Solomon, Robert, 1999. International Effects of the Euro. www.brook.edu/comm/policybriefs/ . Visited March 2001.

& # 183 ; Soltwedel, Rudiger, Dohse Dirk & A ; Krieger-Boden, Christianne. 2000. European Labour Markets and the EMU Challenges Ahead. www.imf.org. Visited April 2001.

& # 183 ; Tett, Gillian, 1996. The Individual Currency: Everything you wanted to cognize? . www.stern.nyu.edu/nroubini/EMU. Visited April 2001.