Foreign Policy of Rosevelt and Wilson Essay Sample

Directions: After our treatment you must utilize the information below to make full in the Venn Diagram to compare and contrast two foreign policies. Then you will utilize your Venn Diagram to compose a comparison and contrast essay. Theodore Roosevelt. Geo politician 1901-1909 Republican

Foreign Policy
1. Believed that Americans were superior people destined for domination in economic and political personal businesss. In order for this to go on. Americans had to endeavor for illustriousness. cultivate mental fittingness. construct military force. and fix to contend. 2. International relation expert: understood that U. S. can non govern every part of the Earth through military or economic reforms. Believed in a balance of power among the industrial states through dialogue instead than war. Such a balance would enable each imperial power to safe guard its cardinal involvement and contribute to universe peace and advancement. 3. Had small forbearance with claims to sovereignty of little states or the human rights of weak people. In his eyes. the peoples of Latin America. Asia ( with the exclusion of Japan ) and Africa as racially inferior and incapable of self-government or industrial advancement. 4. Wanted to dominant Western Hemisphere. Warned European powers from interfering in U. S. involvement ( Monroe Doctrine ) .

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

William Howard Taft. Dollar Diplomat 1909-1913 Republican
Foreign Policy
1. Had experience in covering with imperialist challengers such as Japan as Roosevelt’s secretary of war. but lacked Roosevelt’s appreciation of balance of power political relations and capacity for leading in foreign personal businesss. 2. Taft’s secretary of province. Philander Knox lacked diplomatic expertness. His behavior of foreign policy focused on spread outing chances for corporate investing overseas ( Dollar Diplomacy ) . 3. Taft believed that U. S. investings would efficaciously replace “dollars for slugs. ” and therefore offer a more peaceable and less coercive manner of keeping stableness and order. No demand to flex military musculus to demo off U. S. power like Roosevelt. 4. Try to spread out American economic activities in China which encroached on the Japanese domain of influence which angered them so they signed a friendly relationship pact with Russia to except U. S. goods from Manchurian markets.

Woodrow Wilson. Fighting Idealist 1913-1921 Democrat
Foreign Policy
1. policy in the Caribbean similar to predecessors. sent military personnels to set down a revolution in Haiti. military personnels occupied country for 21 old ages. Dominican Republic ( who shared the island of Hispaniola with the Haitians ) refused to accept a pact doing them a associated state of the U. S. Wilson. forced them to accept the regulation of a U. S. military authorities. 2. To halt German influence in the Danish West Indies. he purchased the islands from Denmark. renamed it the Virgin Islands. and added it to the U. S. Caribbean Empire. 3. He intervened militarily in the Caribbean more frequently than any American president before him. 4. Showed a concern for morality and justness in foreign personal businesss. Troubled by a foreign policy that ignored a less powerful nation’s right to find its ain hereafter.

This thoughts and beliefs stems from his traffics with Mexico. He wanted U. S. foreign policy to progress democratic ideals and establishments in Mexico. On the one manus. he wanted Mexico to be successful in its attempts to go autonomous. on the other manus. non swearing Mexico to happen its manner through its ain revolution. he felt compelled to demo them the manner. His perennial alterations in scheme seemed to bespeak a deficiency of accomplishment and decision in foreign personal businesss at first. 5. Wilson recognized something that Roosevelt or Taft had non: that more and more peoples of the universe were determined to command their ain fates. The U. S. under Wilson was looking for a manner to back up these peoples’ democratic aspirations while safeguarding its ain economic involvements.

Categories