Nafta For Canada Essay Research Paper 1994

Nafta For Canada Essay, Research Paper

1994 the twelvemonth NAFTA had become effectual, delegates from three States ( Canada, United States and Mexico ) had signed a free trade understanding in December of 1992. The leaders of these states signed the understanding with the hopes of prosperity. Isn & # 8217 ; t ironic that five old ages subsequently we are get downing to see that NAFTA was non good but in fact the antonym. Since so NAFTA has ignited ferocious resistance from labor and environmental groups. They have feared that many occupations would be lost either to the U.S.A or Mexico. Currently the state taking most of Canada & # 8217 ; s work force is the U.S with their clasp on engineering they are in fact luring Canadians, the media has called this the & # 8220 ; Brain Drain & # 8221 ; . NAFTA has besides created environmental issues such as a four-lane main road merely for trucks, to do it easier to transport merchandises to one side of the boundary line to the other, which may or may non be built. But if NAFTA intended to be a good for the state so why has it turned out to be so bad, would it be in Canada & # 8217 ; s best involvement that NAFTA is re-signed.

How does the encephalon drain relate to NAFTA?

The encephalon drain is caused when companies take our extremely trained out of Canada and work for them ( normally in the U.S ) . it besides makes it easier for companies to travel from one state to the following.

The encephalon drain is a Canadian job. Why are Canadians go forthing for the U.S.

1. Better Money

The low Canadian dollar Vs. the high American dollar, besides the higher rewards in the States is a large inducement for traveling.

( e.g. A worker for Nortel gets paid $ 48,000 Can or if he works in the U.S he will acquire paid $ 53,000 US. Same Job different wage )

But why do you acquire paid otherwise for the same occupation. It is reasonably simple companies in the U.S acquire revenue enhancement interruptions which allows them to pay their employee & # 8217 ; s more.

2. More chance

There is more chance for success in America so in Canada because America authorities has past statute law that makes it easier to immigrate into the state and go a citizen and one time you & # 8217 ; ve go a citizen you have entree to a great sum of money to get down a concern.

3. Appreciation

This is the most of import any employee wants is grasp. No individual would be happy in a occupation where they are non appreciated. That is the chief ground why people leave for America.

What are possible solutions for the encephalon drain?

v The Canadian authorities should give more money to entrepreneurs, kind of like a fund. The Government would bit in around 30 % to 40 % , the enterpriser would bit would set in 20 % to 30 % and the remainder a bank would loan out. This would do it easier for person to get down up a concern.

v The Canadian Government should give revenue enhancement interruptions to big Business if they move here. This will work in Canada & # 8217 ; s favour because of our low dollar, it will promote companies to come here alternatively of remaining in the U.S. Besides it will be cheaper and more cost productive.

Vs Make it easier to immigrate to Canada from the U.S. This will increase the work force and besides the sum of concerns.

v The B.C Government should seek to do Vancouver the following Silicon Valley. Vancouver already has a batch of engineering companies at that place, but if the Canadian Government implements the three old solutions this may be a world.

Since NAFTA was established a batch of people lost their occupations chiefly because the companies they had worked for had left for the U.S or the company started to reconstitute employee & # 8217 ; s were downsized. Downsizing is another word for fired. In order for Canada to remain competitory, we must set a halt to the encephalon drain. By maintaining our work force in Canada and besides by increasing population. It would assist the Canadian economic system and besides the unemployment rate.

NAFTA is non merely impacting employment but besides the environment. Canada has 9 % of the Earth & # 8217 ; s land and besides the biggest fresh H2O supply in the universe. We must protect that from extra pollution, logging and fishing. But since NAFTA has come into consequence, pollution degrees have increased. There have besides been plans to sell Canada & # 8217 ; s H2O to foreign states.

& # 8220 ; Newfoundland,

Which indicated in February it would back up the Federal enterprise, is now sing a H2O export undertaking that would make employment in the job-poor state. Quebec wants to keep its ain public enquiries before moving, and has spoken out against what it considers Ottawa’s intervention in a provincial affair. It could be old ages before Quebec reaches a provincial policy, which will keep up the national treaty indefinitely, federal functionaries said.”

& # 8220 ; Aquaroute plans to export about 10,000 dozenss of H2O a month,

Mr. Barbeau said, adding that he sees no demand for the company to obtain a authorities permit. & # 8221 ;

& # 8220 ; Aquaroute is at least the forth company in the past twelvemonth to show involvement in exporting H2O from Canada & # 8221 ;

& # 8220 ; A California company is actioning Ottawa under the North American free-trade understanding for non being allowed to export H2O from British Columbia, and McCurdy group is traveling in front with its programs in Newfoundland & # 8221 ;

& # 8220 ; The federal authorities is concerned about the impact that bulk exports of H2O could hold on trade and the environment. & # 8221 ;

& # 8220 ; Water sitting in a lake or river is considered a natural resource but non a good or merchandise, so trade regulations don & # 8217 ; t use. But one time person packages the fresh H2O and sells it, it becomes a good. & # 8221 ;

( Scoffield, 1999 )

The Canadian Government is in a no win state of affairs. If they say no so they will be compromising occupations and if they say yes so they will be compromising the environment.

What are possible solutions?

v The Canadian Government should make trials on the H2O. To see what is a safe sum H2O to take before any environmental harm is done.

V Don & # 8217 ; t sell the H2O. Until NAFTA is renegotiated so the Canadian authorities can be the lone one to sell Canadian H2O.

Another environmental issue is logging, since NAFTA has been in a consequence more and more logging companies have started. There is the biggest environmental issue in Canada, trees produce O without that human & # 8217 ; s and most of the other animate beings on the Earth would decease. The Canadian authorities acted rapidly and past statute law saying that the logging companies must plot seedling for every mature tree they cut down. But with logging the trucks are the 1s making the most polluting. By firing Diesel fuel they are distributing toxic exhausts into the forrest.

Possible solutions

v Presently we can look for cheaper lupus erythematosus fouling ways of fuel. Such as electricity but presently, a truck will necessitate a batch of electricity in order to pick up big, heavy trees.

V Besides find other mean of wood, such as man-made or possibly recycled wood

Another chief concern is over fishing. Over fishing is when a ship exceeds the maximal sum of fish in one twenty-four hours. If ships over-fish so there will be a major deficit of fish so there will hold serious effects. Such as the obvious, as other type of wild life will decease, due to miss of nutrient. ( eg. Sealing waxs eat a batch of fish. But if there is a deficit nutrient, they will decease easy. )

Possible Solutions for over fishing

v The Canadian Government should go through strict regulations, saying that any company caught over-fishing. Would instantly hold the boat confiscated and would hold to pay really high mulcts and they would ne’er be allowed on Canadian H2O for period of clip.

v The authorities should besides put up constabularies boats policing the H2O at all clip.

v The Canadian population could besides assist by non eating every bit much fish. Find other agencies protein.

Canada is known universe broad for our clean air, our forrest & # 8217 ; s and our beautiful lakes. Canadians must protect it at all costs, and NAFTA isn & # 8217 ; t assisting much it is doing the state of affairs a batch worse. NAFTA has opened the doors for big U.S companies to come and destruct Canada. Unless Canada does non any action there will be a serious job non merely for Canada but the universe. If Canada & # 8217 ; s trees go so less O will be produced and all animate beings & # 8217 ; non merely worlds need O, without it we will all decease. Selling Canada & # 8217 ; s H2O is besides a large error particularly if it in a organic structure of H2O that is being over fished. Those two mix are really serious and Canada can non take any opportunities.