Napster Essay Research Paper For many years

Napster Essay, Research Paper

For many old ages the record companies have fixed record monetary values to avoid viing with each other and to maximise their net incomes. Presently, the record companies are join forcesing in order to coerce Napster to close down. The record companies are claiming that Napster is interrupting copyright Torahs. Napster is a peace of package available for free on the Internet, which allows you to download about any vocal you can believe of. All you need to acquire Napster is a computing machine and Internet connexion, the faster the better. Should people experience sympathy for the record companies because of the supposed famishment as a consequence of Napster file sharing? Or should the sympathy prevarication with the users of Napster? Let us analyze who is seeking to close down Napster and for what grounds. Let us besides determine the grounds why people want Napster to stay unfastened.

The Record Company is strongly opposed to Napster for one ground and one ground merely. Apparently, the record companies are losing more and more of the market to Napster file sharing on the Internet. Record companies justify their cases against Napster with the line so frequently used in imperativeness conferences, Napster breaks copyright Torahs. This phrase seems like a legitimate statement. One could understand the grounds for experiencing this manner. For simpleness interest, we will utilize Dave as an illustration. Dave developed a merchandise and sells it, and, at first, his merchandise does really good. His merchandise is so duplicated once more and once more by a individual who purchased his merchandise. Dave watches his gross revenues plumb bob and, of class, feels cheated. Should Dave hold the right to action the individual who copied his merchandise? Most people would state yes. This is the statement the record companies are doing in defence of the cases against Napster. However, allow us look deeper into the affairs of gross revenues within the record companies. Record companies say they are enduring as a consequence of Napster. The monetary value of a Cadmium has stayed the same for many old ages every bit far as I can retrieve. Why would the record companies non raise the monetary value of a Cadmium if their net incomes were dropping? Besides, the gross revenues of records from1999 to 2000 hold really increased 2 % . Why would at that place be an addition in gross revenues if, the record companies claim, Napster is aching their concern and taking up some of the market? I am certain if Napster was good for concern in the record companies eyes, the record companies would non be kicking about copyright violation Torahs being broken. The truth is that the record companies feel their net incomes would speed up with the shut down of Napster and gross revenues would increase farther after. Now, if Dave noticed an addition in net incomes he would presume that the duplicate of his merchandise was non aching his concern ; instead he might experience it was assisting publicize his new merchandise. However, this is merely a theory. The record companies seem to experience the opposite manner. I think it is safe to state that the record companies have formed an confederation against Napster because of the greed which powers the American economic system.

Merely because the record companies want Napster shut down, make non presume that the set does every bit good. Some sets are against Napster, two major illustrations being Dr. Dre and Metallica. Could this be because they hold major portions in record companies and would profit straight from increased net incomes, or because they do non desire people listening to their music? The world is that the huge bulk of sets are pro Napster, as they feel it spreads their music all over the universe and helps their set make a name for themselves. After all isn T that what music is all about, holding your music heard? You may be inquiring why wouldn T sets be anti Napster when they get all that money from record gross revenues. The reply is that sets receive less so 10 % of the gross revenues for the album, while Thursday

vitamin E record companies receive over 60 % . Large portions of record net incomes would explicate why the record companies have much more of an involvement in Napster than the sets do. The sets gross comes largely from unrecorded shows, visual aspects and indorsements. Therefore, the sets would back up Napster to seek and distribute their music and derive a fan base. For illustration, when the lead vocalist of Kid Rock was asked how he felt about the Napster argument he replied, Why should I care? I am rich. Besides, the set Rage Against the Machine really publically asked fans non to purchase their new album Renegades. They suggested that the user download it from Napster alternatively. Fury is a set, which, if they could be heard by as many citizens of the universe as possible, would experience they have achieved some of their ends as a set. Ramp Against the Machine is a really political set and are non hesitating to voice their sentiments about the greed of corporate America and the record concern. Ramp Against the Machine besides has detailed instructions on their web site on how to acquire back on Napster if you have been banned due to Dr. Dre or Metallica, which many people have. The sets non merely back up Napster because it personally benefits the bulk of them, but because most sets play music to be heard and the more people hear their music the better, which is what music is all about. The involvement of the set is non based merely on money, as is the instance with the record companies, which control them.

It seems this essay has talked about every group involved except those who matter most in this argument, as have most other signifiers of coverage on this subject. The people who use Napster are by far in favour of maintaining it unfastened. User support for Napster could be for the ground that the user gets free music. Besides, support for Napster could be because this capable contains issues, which relate to freedom of address and freedom of the imperativeness. Besides, the user feels that he/she is interrupting no Torahs when utilizing Napster since no 1 is doing money when a vocal is downloaded. Should a individual be charged with copyright violation when entering a vocal from the wireless, or firing a Cadmium of all their favourite vocals? There has been no treatment of closing down wireless or censoring Cadmium burners so why is Napster so different? Napster users download files from one another for personal usage. The files are non packaged and sold on the unfastened market nor do these files in anyhow compete with the record companies merchandises in shops. It is a individual s right to hold entree to music on the Internet as they do with information. Peoples have the right to listen music of their pick every bit much as they have the pick to read and watch whatever they want. Should we get down bear downing people to watch Much Music or to listen to the wireless? Where would the line be drawn?

The record companies have maintained fixed monetary values on albums for old ages to avoid competition with one another and now that they have some competition they are shouting foul. It is the duty of the record company to alter their ways of selling music to remain alive in the universe today. The populace should non experience sorry for them. Record companies are a multi billion-dollar industry with increasing net incomes. They are still seeking to catch more and more of the market topographic point. If Napster shuts down, what is following? Radio? Television? Censoring of the Internet? Is the public merely traveling to stand by and watch these big corporations toss a cover over the people s caputs and bust their pockets? I feel it is up to the consumer to make up one’s mind if he or she wishes to back up the record companies and other big corporations ; nevertheless, I will ne’er purchase another Cadmium for the remainder of my life every bit long as record companies continue to squash every penny from the music loving public like a sponge and go on to disregard the existent purpose of music.