Nature Versus Civilization Essay Research Paper Nature

Nature Versus Civilization Essay, Research Paper

Nature Versus Civilization

In comparing and contrasting Civilization Over Nature by Michael Heiman with Nature Over Civilization by Robert Kuhn McGregor I have discovered that their chief subjects over lap in one or more ways. They both define & # 8220 ; Nature & # 8221 ; in wholly different facets. Therefore that is manner their chief subjects appear to be so much different.

Michael Heiman argues that nature was put aside for the capitalistic positions of the 19th century. This so implies that nature was put aside for the production of civilisation. Therefore tie ining the human race purely with civilisation and non nature. Nature is merely made up of the landscape and the animate beings and workss within it. In Heiman & # 8217 ; s illustration of this he speaks of the development of the Hudson Valley for the transit of goods across the state. He tells of how the devastation of this country throughout the 19th century was overlooked by the creative persons and tour ushers that traveled this path. The point of views that Heiman carried throughout his essay had a concentric orientation towards civilisation. As for Heiman & # 8217 ; s chief subject he proposes that civilisation was the ultimate world.

As for McGregor he proposed to hold with the biocentric position that worlds and workss and animate beings were all living histrions in the drama of life therefore doing worlds a portion of nature as good. As for the civilisation facet of it all he goes on to explicate that animate beings have their ain civilisations in which some of them change the environment in the same ways as our civilisation. In the terminal of it all he believes that nature is the ultimate world.

In order to compare and contrast we have to first see the chief portion where they clash. Heiman sees nature as the landscape, workss, and animate beings hence doing worlds the equivalent word for civilisation. McGregor on the other manus says that nature has its ain civilisation merely as worlds do. So worlds are now a portion of nature merely as a Equus caballus might be. My inquiry is if everything is a portion of nature even our ain civilisation so what makes up & # 8220 ; civilisation & # 8221 ; in his eyes? Nature would hold to be the ultimate world because he is non even comparing it to civilization in a sense. Heiman has a solid statement because he is really comparing the two. McGregor is right in his essay when he says that if you believe in a biocentric history it is a lonely route because non many other people are on it. In shutting I agree with Heiman because there is no manner that our civilisation can be anyplace near the civilisation of any other life being. Due to how we use up all of our resources and work the landscape. Civilization had to hold been the ultimate world no inquiries asked.

I will compare these two essays with the same four paperss in order to demo the similarities that each has to other in footings of the papers. The four paperss that I will be comparing these two essays to are ; John James Audubon on Shooting Birds,

James Fenimore Cooper Laments the “Wasty Ways” of Pioneers, Hudson River Painters Depict Nature, and Rebecca Harding Davis on Pollution and Human Life in the Iron Mills.

Audubon is a preservationist on birds and is one of the earliest. If I had to take a side I would state that he would hold with Heiman in stating that civilisation over rides nature in this instance due to the fact that worlds are hiting birds. Alternatively of birds killing birds or Equus caballuss killing birds. As the civilisation of worlds is turning bigger and bigger Audubon saw that this athletics was acquiring bigger and nature was acquiring exploited. I do non see McGregor holding with Audubon because my feeling of McGregor in the manner of nature is a kind of endurance of the fittest.

In Cooper & # 8217 ; s try he talks about the pointless violent death of birds as good but with a small different turn being that he to a great extent criticizes the inordinate thriftlessness of the innovators due to the copiousness of nature. In regard to the two essays I see a representation of both in similar ways. This papers corresponds better with that of McGregor seeing that nature is a larger portion of life and everyone is a portion of it. Cooper saw that nature was being exploited because there seemed to be an eternal supply. Harmonizing to McGregor that eternal supply includes us as human existences. Sing that Heiman sees the human race as a civilisation that would explicate why worlds are the major cause of the development of birds and in that instance nature as a whole.

The pictures of the Hudson River school show the beauty of the Hudson River and the Catskill countries of New York State and portray nature as being dark, wild, cryptic, and sublime. Yet they show civilisation as being light, unagitated, and peaceable. I believe that this is relevant in the manner that Heiman says that creative persons tried to cover up the defects that civilisation has caused to nature. So therefore Heiman would wholly differ with what these creative persons are seeking to portray. Equally far as McGregor goes he would wish these pictures because they imply that nature is acquiring along with civilisation in a great manner.

In the concluding papers by Harding she is seeking to do the public aware of the toll that industrialisation is taking on nature and human nature. That is interesting in itself she is seting human nature in a different class than nature in general. In respects to McGregor & # 8217 ; s try he would wholly differ with this due to his biocentric theory. He sees all of nature as one. But Heiman would for the most portion agree with Harding because he sees our civilisation taking a toll on nature yet does non see nature in two parts as she does.

In closing on all of this comparison and contrasting I see more understanding on the chief issues instead than dissension. The two essays see two wholly different points of position portion in comparing them to the paperss there are both similarities and unsimilarities among all comparings.

Bibliography

none needed

33b