Stereotypes of Quiet Men Essay Sample
Across clip and civilization. the female preference for chattiness and the male preference for reserve have approached the position of inarguable facts. Now. two surveies appear to bury these antique stereotypes. One recorded about 400 college pupils for yearss and found that members of each sex uttered virtually the same figure of words. “Wherever this truly relentless stereotype comes from. we do non happen grounds to back up it. ” said Matthias R. Mehl. a psychologist at the University of Arizona whose paper is published today in Science. The 2nd. an analysis of 63 surveies of gender differences in garrulity. found that work forces really yakked somewhat more than adult females. particularly when interacting with partners or aliens. and when the subject of conversation was non-personal. Although. overall. “the magnitude of the difference was negligible. ” said Campbell Leaper. a psychologist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. the findings suggest that “some work forces may be utilizing talkativeness to rule the conversation. ” His survey will look in a extroverted issue of Personality and Social Psychology Review. Female garrulity is ensconced in gags. literature and even jurisprudence.
In Colonial America when gossipmongering was punishable with the “ducking stool. ” adult females were the more common victims. The thought appeared to derive scientific authorization with the publication last twelvemonth of Louann Brizendine’s best-selling book “The Female Brain. ” which asserted — without mentioning informations — that adult females utter about 20. 000 words a twenty-four hours and work forces about 7. 000. Despite the popular position. few surveies have found important differences between the sexes in overall verboseness. although adult females and work forces ( and male childs and misss ) do diverge in some noteworthy state of affairss. The surveies that Mehl and his co-workers analyzed were done among six groups of college pupils — five in the United States. one in Mexico — who wore digital sound recording equipments during their waking hours for two to 10 yearss. Every 12 1/2 proceedingss. the machines turned on and recorded 30 seconds of sound. The research workers counted the figure of words captured and extrapolated the sample to the whole twenty-four hours.
Women spoke an norm of 16. 215 words and work forces 15. 669 words during an norm of 17 waking hours a twenty-four hours. The difference — merely under 550 words — was non statistically important. The research workers checked to see if there was a tendency for the most chatty persons to be adult females. There was non. Of the most chatty 15 per centum. half were adult females and half work forces. In three of the six samples. the individual most chatty individual was a adult male. What was striking. Mehl said. was the great scope of word usage. The most was 47. 000 words in a twenty-four hours ; the least was 700. Because the speakers were all college pupils on approximately similar agendas. their word usage may non be the same as that of people in other age groups. But the consistence of the consequences suggests that there is no unconditioned difference in verboseness between the sexes — at any age. “If there are encephalon differences. you should see them in college pupils. ” he said.
The 63 surveies examined in the meta-analysis done by Leaper and Melanie Ayres ( besides of UC-Santa Cruz ) were different from Mehl’s. Most involved detecting people in laboratory conditions — speaking in braces. in groups. sometimes with kids and sometimes with lone one sex present — for periods of up to two hours. The determination that work forces talk more than adult females did non keep for entire figure of words ( as in the Mehl survey ) but for other steps of garrulity. such as entire figure of statements. continuance of speech production and “mean vocalization length. ” The state of affairss in which work forces talked more than adult females were conversations between partners or spouses ; conversations that included people of both sexes and when research workers were present ; and state of affairss in which the subject involved dissension or was of a non-personal nature.
The state of affairss in which adult females talked more than work forces were those among schoolmates. and between parents and kids ; those when the activity was child-oriented ; and those when the subject of conversation required revelation of feelings. “This underscores how many gender differences can be situation-specific. ” Leaper said. However. an analysis of 73 surveies of children’s conversation found the opposite consequence — misss are more chatty than male childs. Leaper. who besides authored that survey. said that as with grownups. the difference was little and differed from state of affairs to state of affairs. Girls were particularly more chatty than male childs when interacting with grownups. They besides talked more during activities of their ain choosing. That may reflect a penchant for games such as playing house. which requires more communicating. instead than building undertakings and athleticss. which boys tend to prefer. Leaper said. Assigned to the same undertaking. male childs and misss are every bit chatty.
That analysis. published in 2004. found that the biggest gender differences in garrulity was in yearlings — which may reflect the earlier acquisition of linguistic communication by misss — but that. by age 13. male childs have started to out-talk misss. Brizendine. the head-shrinker at the University of California at San Francisco who wrote “The Female Brain. ” said she got the 20. 000 vs. 7. 000 words statistic from a secondary beginning. She has concluded that it is non accurate ; it was removed from her book in the 2nd printing. “The following inquiry is: Why has this myth about women’s garrulity persisted so doggedly? Why has it been passed down through the ages with such hilarities? ” she said yesterday.
© 2007 The Washington Post Company [ movie ]
