Twelve Angry Men Essay Sample

‘Twelve Angry Men’ shows that personal experience is the strongest factor act uponing human determination – devising processes. Discourse

Roses play Twelve Angry Men is about a dissenting juryman in a slaying test who easy manages to convert the other jurymans that the instance they are analyzing is non as evidently clear as it seemed in tribunal. The defense mechanism and the prosecution have rested and the jury is make fulling into the jury room to make up one’s mind if a immature 16 twelvemonth old male child of a minority race is guilty or inexperienced person of slaying his male parent. It begins as an ‘open and shut’ instance of slaying. but shortly becomes a mini play of each of the jurors’ biass and prepossessions about the test. the accused. and each other. which every jury room tries to avoid. Prejudices’ and misconceptions are formed through personal experiences which influence human determination devising. which is shown throughout the drama from all jurymans but is distinctively shown through Juror 3.

The 3rd juryman is the most vocal about the ‘guilt’ of the adolescent. As the drama goes along it is revealed he has a personal connexion with what has happened. he feels choler towards his ain boy. an choler which he has transferred onto the accused. A cardinal minute for the 3rd juryman is when he eventually changes his ballot to ‘not guilty’ which is when he is reminded by the 8th juryman “It’s non your male child. He’s person else’” . followed by the 4th juryman saying “let him live” . Right up to this point. the 3rd juryman was committed to his ‘guilty’ ballot. By juryman 3 leting his emotional luggage to come in the jury room with him it is clear that from the beginning of the drama. his personal experience with his boy were physiologically excessively powerful for him to be able to do the right finding of fact for the suspect.