Was Nazism An Ideology Essay Research Paper

Was Nazism An Ideology? Essay, Research Paper

Naziism, ideological

or non? This is a really of import inquiry when looking into the rise of Hitler

and how he used his alleged? political orientations? to win over the support of the

German people. The dictionary definition of the word? Ideology? is? Ideas that

organize the footing of a political or economic theory? , from this we should be able

to weigh the grounds to see if the Nazis thoughts approximately political and economic

system organize an political orientation. The Nazis did non suit the standards for being ideological ;

they were contradictory and hypocritical. The Nazis coagulated the thoughts and

theories of philosophers, instrumentalists and scientists and produced them in a manner

that appealed to the multitudes this is what made the Nazi party believable and bearable.

Hitler presented to the multitudes a barrage of political and ideological thoughts,

which seemed to take into history every person and personal sentiment of the

mean and so in-between category German. The chauvinistic constituent to Nazism

appealed to every German, the fact that they were superior and stronger than

other states appealed to the multitudes and the evident coherent manner in which

Hitler presented these thoughts made it more credible than pathetic. Firstly it is necessary to

expression at what Hitler and so the NSDAP wanted for Germany. In a programme,

which the German Workers? Party published on 24th February 1920 it

provinces the beliefs and thoughts of the party, it was co-written by Hitler along

with Anton Drexler, the leader of the party at that clip. Reading through this

papers it is clear that the 25 point? demands? of the party were really

contradictory. For illustration point 2 provinces that? We demand equality of right for

the German People in its traffics with other states, and the abolishment of the

Peace Treaties of Versailles and St Germain. ? This would indirectly appeal to

German Generals as the down size of the ground forces caused the dwindling power and

server occupation losingss in Germany. The Generals would be able to confirm themselves

into the military places that they one time held and take advantage of the independent

provinces that one time belonged to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. In point 22 nevertheless

it says? We demand the abolishment of the professional ground forces and its replacing

by a peoples army. ? Obviously this is estranging the Generals, as the original

bossy and hawkish government of the ground forces would be abolished for a new? peoples?

ground forces, which is really socialistic and partially communistic. From this we can see

that Hitler was really contradictory, it is apparent that Hitler wanted to flog up

the support of the people but non merely certain people he wanted the whole

support of the state, to make this he had to be hypocritical and contradictory. In

Hitler? s book Mein Kampf ( My Struggle ) , 1925 he states that? Politics is the

art of utilizing work forces? s weaknesses for one? s ends. ? This clearly shows Hitler? s

purposes on how to acquire the support of the German people, by appealing to

every individual German regardless of societal standing. From the 25-point programme

I have picked out the four predominant beliefs of the party they are racism,

socialism, patriotism and anti-democracy I will travel onto see how these became

the? political orientations? of the Nazi party. Hitler? s National Socialists

believed to a great extent in the? November Criminals? and? Stab in the Back? theories.

Hitler used this against the authorities as propaganda to flog up support for

his ain party. He believed that the Weimar democracy had humiliated Germany and

had put shame on the German people. Hitler? s thoughts were built on

his construct of race. He believed that humanity consisted of a calibrated

hierarchy of races and that life was no more than? the endurance of the fittest? .

He argued that Social Darwinism necessitated a battle between races, merely as

animate beings fought for nutrient and district in the natural state. Furthermore, he considered

it critical to keep racial pureness, so that the blood of the weak would non

sabotage the strong. It was a rough doctrine, which appears even more

simplistic when Hitler? s analysis of the races is considered. The Herrenvolk

( maestro race ) was the Aryan race, made up of peoples of Northern Europe and

epitomised by the Germans. It was the undertaking of the Aryan to stay pure and to

repress the inferior races. ? At the

lower terminal of his racial pyramid Hitler placed the Negroes, the Slavs, the

Itinerants and, the peculiar focal point of his hate, the Jews. ? Hitler? s antisemitism was violent and irrational.

? The Jew became the universal whipping boy

for the Nazi, responsible for all the jobs of Germany yesteryear and

present. ? Hitler saw the Judaic

community as a sort of malignant neoplastic disease within the German organic structure politic? a disease that

had to be treated, as the following infusion from Mein Kampf illustrates: ? ? The debasement of the

blood and racial impairment conditioned thereby are the lone causes that

history for the diminution of ancient civilizations: for it i

s ne’er by war that

states are ruined, but by the loss of their powers of opposition, which are

entirely a feature of pure racial blood. ? A figure of points in the

1920 programme demanded socialist reforms, and for a long clip at that place existed a

cabal within the party which emphasised the anti-capitalist facet of

Nazism. ? Hitler accepted these points in

the early old ages because he recognised their popular entreaty, but he himself

ne’er showed any existent committedness to such thoughts, and they were to be dropped

after he came to power. ? What Hitler did

promote was the construct of the Volksgemeinschaft ( people? s community ) . ? This remained the vaguest component of the

Nazi political orientation, and is hence hard to specify precisely. ? ? It meant working together for the benefit

of the state ; the proviso of occupations and societal benefits ; and the encouragement

of? German values? . ? Such a system could

of class merely benefit those who belonged to the German Volk and who volitionally

accepted the loss of single freedoms in an autocratic system. In Hitler? s sentiment there

was no realistic option to strong dictatorial government. ? Ever since his old ages in Vienna he had viewed

parliamentary democracy as weak and ineffective. ? It went against the German Historical traditions of militarism

and tyranny, and farther more, it encouraged the development of an even

greater immorality, communism. ? More

specifically, Hitler saw Weimar democracy as a treachery. In his eyes, it was

the democratic and socialist politicians of 1918? the November Criminals? who had

stabbed the German ground forces in the dorsum, by accepting the cease-fire and

set uping the Republic. ? Since so

Germany had lurched from crisis to crisis. ?

In topographic point of democracy Hitler envisaged the creative activity of an across-the-board

one party province that would be run on the leading rule. ( Fuhrerprinzip ) . ? Therefore, the mass of persons in society

were t be subjugated for the common good, but the single leader was to? be elevated in order to bestir the states

into action, and to take the necessary determinations. The concluding component in Nazi

political orientation was an aggressive patriotism, which developed out of the peculiar fortunes

of Germany? s recent history. ? The

cease-fire of 1918 and the subsequent Treaty of Versailles had to be overturned

and the lost districts had to be restored to Germany. ? But Hitler? s patriotism called for more

than a mere Restoration of the 1914 frontiers. ?

It meant the creative activity of an imperium ( Reich ) to include all those members

of the German Volk who lived beyond the frontiers of the Kaiser? s Germany. The Austrian

Germans, the Sudeten Germans, the German communities along the Baltic seashore,

all were to be included within the boundary lines of Germany.. Yet Hitler? s

patriot purposes did non stop there. ? He dreamed

of a Greater Germany, a world power capable of viing with the British Empire

and the United States. ? Such an

aim could be achieved merely by territorial enlargement on a expansive

scale. ? This was the footing of Hitler? s

demand for Lerberndtaum ( populating infinite ) for Germany. ? Merely by the conquering of Poland, the Ukraine and Russia could Germany

obtain the natural stuffs, inexpensive labor and nutrient supplies so necessary for

Continental supremacy. ? The creative activity of

the? New Order? in eastern Europe besides held one other great attractive force ; ; viz.

it would affect the devastation of Russia, the Centre of universe communism. ? As he argued in Mein Kampf: ? the German people must be

assured the territorial country which is necessary for it to be on Earth? Peoples

of the same blood should be in the same Reich. ?

The German people will hold no right to prosecute in a colonial policy

until they shall hold brought all their kids together in one state. ? To descirbe Hitler? s

believing as an political orientation is flattery. It lacked coherency and was intellectually

superficial and simplistic. It wasn? t even a rational system of idea. It was

simply a aggregation of thoughts non cleaverly pieced together. Although the

combination was alone, it was non in any positive sense origional. Every

facet of Hitler? s thought was to be found in the patriot and racialist

Hagiographas of the nineteenth century. His patriotism was generated in

Germany in the old ages between Prussia? s battle against Napolian and the fusion

of 1871. His thought of an all German Reich was a simple repition of the demands

for the? Greater Germany? made by those German patriots who criticised Bismarck? s

limited fusion. Even the imperialism of Lebensraum had already found

look in the programme of? Germanisation? supported by those authors who

saw the German race driver as some how superior. This turning support for the Volk

had besides gone manus in manus with the development of racialist thoughts, and in

specific of antisemitism. Thus, even before Hitler and other taking German nazi

were born, the nucleus of what would go Nazism was already current in

political circles.