Agency And Organizational Profile Interview Essay Sample
The United States District Court Pretrial Services and Probation Office. ( Northern District of Ohio ) organisation was chosen for this essay because this is where my field arrangement is and my involvement are in going an employee of U. S Pretrial and Probation office in the hereafter. This essay provided a brief history of United States District Court Pretrial Services and Probation Office. the duties of United States District Court Pretrial Services and Probation Office. and the SWOT ( strengths. failing. chances. and menaces ) – of the bureau and theoretical positions were farther discussed in greater item as the essay goes on.
On January 29. 2013. Tawanna Norton an MSW. pupil at Cleveland State University conducted an in individual interview at the U. S. Pretrial and Probation Office at 801 West Superior Avenue. Suite 3-100 Cleveland. Ohio 44113. She interviewed Pamela Lynch who has achieved her Master’s Degree in Social Work. and serves as the Assistant Deputy Chief at that Agency. When puting the assignment to interview Ms. Lynch. Tawanna offered her the option to carry on the interview either in individual or over the telephone. It was agreed that an in individual interview would be best. this would let Tawanna the chance to tour the installation every bit good as develop a sense for an outpatient environment whose mission is to protect the populace ; by adhering to an expressed set of beliefs and values through quality investigative. supervising and support systems. The bureau mission has evolved over the old ages due to engineering and research. The anterior mission stateted they provided intervention chances for positive lifestyle alterations. Ms. Lynch stated “the bureau dainties everyone with equity and self-respect as they strive to present excellence” .
The Federal Probation Act of 1925. provided for the constitution of the federal probation system. The probation office for the Northern District of Ohio officially opened its doors on February 12. 1940. with the first officer assignment in Cleveland. followed shortly thenceforth by an assignment of an officer in Toledo. Originally. it was under the legal power of the section of Justice and The Bureau of prisons which was designated by the Attorney General to supervise the new system’s administrative way and supervising. In 1940. a twelvemonth after Congress established the Administrative Office ( AO ) of the U. S Courts. a declaration of the Judicial Conference of the U. S transferred administrative control of the Federal Probation System to the AO. Within the AO. the Division of Probation was to supervise the system. During. the 1950’s and 1960’s. dramatic additions in the size and complexness of the work loads of probation offices resulted in the enlargement of the officer places. In 1963. the so Judicial Conference of the U. S Committee on the Administration of the Probation System ( now known as the Criminal Law Committee ) was created as an ad hoc commission devoted entirely to the support and betterment of the federal probation system ; in acknowledgment of the important function probation officers played in community corrections of federal suspects and wrongdoers.
In 1975. Congress passed the Speedy Trial Act of 1974. authorising the AO to set up pretrial service bureaus in a few tribunals. In the 1980’s pretrial services expanded countrywide and became an of import and built-in portion of the federal probation system. In 1982. the president signed into jurisprudence the Pretrial Services Act. directing the AO to set up pretrial services in each judicial territory except the District of Columbia. They could be a separate bureau or combined with probation. In the last few old ages. because of budget restraints. separate pretrial bureaus have been consolidating with probation. As a federal governmental bureau. support is entirely from Congressional appropriations. The budget is allocated based on the old financial year’s work load expression.
This has changed focal point over the old ages. Previously ; it was based on Numberss of studies generated every bit good the Numberss of wrongdoers supervised in old old ages. Now it is based on Numberss of presentence studies. figure of wrongdoers supervised and figure of wrongdoers take parting in particular plans. i. e. location monitoring. drug and mental wellness intervention. sex wrongdoers. etc. While some territories require wrongdoers to pay for some or all of their intervention on a skiding graduated table. The Northern District of Ohio has non done so traditionally because few of their wrongdoers are financially able to pay. Often they have immense damages orders. so it’s preferred that any excess monies go toward the victim of the discourtesy. The exclusion is wrongdoers who are take parting in the location supervising plan may be required to pay for monitoring services if determined they have the agencies. The money is non collected by the officers ; it is billed by the monitoring bureau with whom the probation office has a contract.
The demographics of the offender population of The U. S. Pretrial and Probation Services have non ever been recorded. It has decidedly changed over the last 20 old ages. Harmonizing to Ms. Lynch who has been in the territory since 1993. the drug. violent and piece discourtesies have increased whereas antecedently. the bulk of offenses were considered ”white collar” . However. fraud discourtesies are on the addition. The racial per centums have changed. During the mid-1990’s. the bulk of wrongdoers were white ( 60. 6 % white vs. 35. 4 % black in 1995 ) . Gradually. the Numberss changed as they moved toward more drug and gun discourtesies of strong belief. For illustration in 2012. the per centums were 50. 9 % black to 44. 3 percent white.
In 1995. 77. 4 % of wrongdoers on supervising were male and 22. 5 % were female. but in 2012. 87. 4 % were male and 12. 6 % were female. The mean age of wrongdoers in 1995 was late 30’s to mid-40. while in 2012 ; the mean age is 30 to 39. with the following largest group is 18 to 29. As indicated above. the racial make-up of wrongdoers is bulk black. and white wrongdoer Numberss are 2nd. Males well outnumber females and although we do non maintain records of category or income degree. a bulk of the wrongdoers are destitute. The offices are located in Cleveland ( central office ) . Akron. Youngstown and Toledo. There are a batch of officially classified wrongdoers by geographics in footings of Numberss. but most are from the urban countries of each metropolis. Harmonizing. to Ms. Lynch
Ms. Lynch was non cognizant of any formal strategic planning. The bureau is headed by a Chief Pretrial Services and Probation Officer and his 2nd in bid Deputy Chief ; presently there are besides two Assistant Deputy Chiefs and an Administrative Assistant. this makes up the senior direction squad. The docket for the bureau is determined by enterprises desired by the Chief. There are core responsibilities for the territory that do non alter. such as pretrial services. presentence probe and studies and station strong belief supervising. The statutory responsibilities are promulgated by Congress. Anything excess must be provided by the AO and Court.
The supernumeraries change depending on who is at the helm. The current Chief is due to retire in May 2013. he had a figure of enterprises he wanted to carry through and he directed the territory to work on them one time he received blessing from either the AO and/or the Judges. Given their authorities budget issues nevertheless. it is speculated that there will be any money to make much extra and hardly plenty do the rudimentss. As it stands the bureau is confronting furloughs and layoffs based on the financial drop or at hand segregation. Many staff members have been offered and have taken early retirement. Several places have non been filled. more retirements are coming and the hereafter is unsure. Ms. Lynch besides states that “The bureau will go on to be. but how it will look is anyone’s guess” .
Based on the bureau interview the followers has been determined about the organisation utilizing a SWOT ( Strengths. Weaknesses. Opportunities and Threats ) analysis. There are three strengths: Cost. Information and Reputation. The ground costs are considered strength although the bureau stated they did non hold any money to make much is because it’s a federal bureau and they are funded by congressional appropriations. However. authorities bureaus are typically larger than private bureaus and hence benefit from economic systems of graduated table. This means that they can negociate lower costs from providers because the big sum they purchase. They besides create efficiencies between sections. leting the bureau itself to hold more people actively engaged in devote important clip and resources to the bureaus and activities that help profit their client’s demands.
A 2nd strength is information. Government bureaus benefit from integrating into the overall authorities system. which provides them with a great trade of information and latitude. These bureaus frequently work closely with the tribunal and jurisprudence enforcement systems to portion information and resources. Accurate and up-to-date information helps the bureaus perform their occupations with greater success and efficiency. The 3rd strength is Reputation. Government bureaus have the backup of the authorities of which they are a portion. which provides a repute premium behind their actions. Government bureaus may happen it easier to work with both groups and persons due to their position as authorities representatives. Workers from private bureaus may hold to get down their work with their clients by turn outing their legitimacy. which authorities workers typically would non hold to make.
There are three failings: support. mission statement and strategic planning. When a authorities bureau references confronting furloughs and layoffs due to the financial drop that means people will be forced to work yearss without wage and /or non hold a occupation and because they are funded through Congress. The authorities bureaus have larger budgets which end up aching the employees and the population it serves. The 2nd failing is the mission statement when revised should hold included the information from the old 1 that the bureau provided intervention chances for positive lifestyle alterations. The ground behind my statement is because a major portion of the services that this bureau offers is intervention for their clients.
The probation officers really do the proving onsite as a portion of the supervising and supplying them with the tools and resources to assist advance positive life style alterations is done on a day-to-day footing. The 3rd failing of the bureau is the strategic planning. Harmonizing to a senior degree officer this bureau does non hold a formal strategic program. and that the docket is based on the desires of the head. Which harmonizing to The National Association of Social Work ( 1982 ) asserted this impression. saying in their manual on community work accomplishments and cognition. which the political orientation of the worker will act upon which groups a worker does and does non back up and the schemes endorsed by the worker. This would intend a batch of alterations could take topographic point within the bureau and non be in conformity with the inquiry of political orientation in community work theory and pattern explicating that `the manner a worker makes sense` of constructs will act upon their pattern. If an bureau does non hold a program in topographic point harmonizing to the statement the bureau needs to spread out upon making a theoretical account straight associating political political orientation to community work pattern.
There are two external menaces to the bureau transporting out its mission statement. which are statistical arrested development and diffusion or imitation of
intervention. Statistical Arrested development can happen in perennial step designs when people score either highly high or highly low on appraisals. You could see arrested development toward the mean. The following clip you measure them ; there will be a inclination for their tonss to travel in the way toward the mean. This becomes confounding because you will non cognize if the DV changed because of the IV. or because of arrested development toward the mean. Diffusion or imitations of intervention participants in one intervention group become familiar with the intervention of another group. They so either transcript that intervention or are merely otherwise affected by what they have learned. As such. they are no longer “naive” and this changes their behaviour. This will minimise or dissemble wholly the difference between your groups in a group. There are two internal menaces to the bureau transporting out its mission statement. morality and research. Morality which in this instance refers to attrition due to compliant “non-compliant”
If mortality occurs in one status more than the other conditions. so you have a job. specifically. a confound The “supervised released” in the group that was hit peculiarly difficult are likely really different from the topics in the other groups. If you now see a difference between the groups. you won’t cognize if it’s because of the IV or something peculiar to that one group of compliant population. Even if mortality is about the same for each group. you still have a job. To what extent do the non-compliant represent the population you had originally targeted? I. e. you have a job with compliant. The 2nd internal menace to the bureau is research ; we tend to utilize convenience sampling and trial largely wrongdoers who are on supervising. To what extent do wrongdoers on supervising represent the general population? To the extent that they don’t. our external menaces suffer. There are two external chances to the bureau they are able to utilize in constructing their hereafter.
These external chances are preparations and instruction of future federal employees and the authorities is committed to presenting comprehensive authorities developing to run into the employee and clients’ demands or supply private on/off-site preparation plan based on the subjects of demand. All of the preparations are a combination of subjects that the bureau and clients will use to do it good to both parties involved. The basic demands are merely the get downing point in using to work at USPPO ( United States Pretrial and Probation Office ) . To be considered for employment as a Federal Probation Officer. you must be a US citizen with a completed Master’s Degree or working toward a Master’s Degree. possess a valid driver’s licence and subject a 250-300 word essay on the topic of pick. There are two internal chances to the bureau they are able to utilize in constructing their hereafter Interview procedure and Background Investigation. The bureau is looking for motivated people who possess strong interpersonal accomplishments and the ability to take enterprise ; people who are empathic and sensitive to the cultural ethical motives of a altering society. and computing machine literacy.
The application procedure is strict. competitory and drawn-out. Because of the sensitive nature of USPPO work. all appliers must undergo security background probes by the FBI. This shows they merely want the best of the best working for their bureau. There are two major theoretical positions are `empowerment and societal control this contested concept` ( Saleebey. 2005 ) . distinguishes the usage of the term authorization as a capitalist tool for increasing productiveness in the workplace from `educational practice` authorization which he feels can construct `hegemony within the working class`
Therefore we become cognizant of non merely an component of rhetoric environing the term authorization but a disparity of significances. As societal workers it is imperative that we are clear in what we perceive to be empowerment and that we remain focussed upon the educational procedure as we address our clients need and back up the pattern of the bureau. Traditionally societal control has been seen as a coercive procedure. which engenders societal conformance and maintains position quo. Indeed `Without its values. society would hold no manner of modulating the interchange of citizens ; without its order. pandemonium. lawlessness and uninterrupted war for hegemony are likely to ensue. The procedure which enforces values and maintains order is termed societal control` ( Robbins. Chatterjee. & A ; Canada. 2011 ) .
Social control within a context of federal bureau may be regarded as a procedure of continuity. Indeed much community work particularly that of those with right flying political political orientation. involves self-help and doing the best of what you have. Therefore. it could be argued that this sort of work reinforces the current control and deflects from efforts to dispute the subjugation it creates. particularly if this challenge may attest as civil noncompliance. Furthermore it could be argued that many authorities bureaus who work towards little political additions and betterments for person are merely functioning to lenify a potentially baleful corporate group of groups. That is by leting them political additions they are discouraged from seeking corporate action with other groups in similar places of disadvantage and trying a extremist alteration at a regional or even national degree. These theoretical positions are the driving force behind the U. S. Pretrial and Probation Office for the Northern District of Ohio.
Mention Page
1. Lynch. P. ( 2013. January 29 ) . Personal interview.
2. National Association of Social work ( 2013. January 30 ) Code of Ethical motives retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. socialworkers. org/pubs/code/code. asp
3. Robbins. S. P. . Chatterjee. P. & A ; Canada. E. R. ( 2012 ) . Contemporary human behaviour theory: A critical position for societal work. Third Edition. Boston: Allyn & A ; Bacon
4. Saleebey. D. ( 2005 ) . The strengths positions in societal work pattern ( 4th ed. ) Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
5. The Council of Social Work Education ( 2013. January 30 ) retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. cswe. org.
