Crucible As A Hero Essay Research Paper

Crucible As A Hero Essay, Research Paper

A calamity should convey fright and commiseration to the reader. A adult male in this calamity non

should be exceptionally righteous, but his mistakes should come about because of a

certain irreversible mistake on his portion. This adult male should happen a bad or fatal

stoping to add to the calamity of the narrative, for this adult male in the tragic hero. The

supporter John Proctor portrays a tragic hero in The Crucible ; his tragic flaw of

criminal conversation causes great internal battles, he displays hubris by disputing

authorization, and he encounters calamity through acknowledgment and reversal. John

Proctor? s determination to bewray his married woman causes internal battles and finally

leads to his calamity at the terminal of the play. Hamartia is the primary mistake

of the tragic hero which provokes portion of his bad luck. Proctor? s serious

error of criminal conversation delivers jobs with Abigail Williams and indirectly

causes his jailing. Abigail is a adult immature adult female, and yet she is an orphan who

errors John Proctor? s sex for true love. When Proctor tells Abigail that the

relationship can no longer go on, the miss becomes angry and sorrowful

( 1098 ) . In order to turn out Abigail? s wickedness and to discredit her in forepart

of the tribunal, Proctor proclaims that he had an matter with this evil kid. The

outraged tribunal functionaries summon Elizabeth Proctor to happen the truth. When asked

about her hubby, Elizabeth? s psyche is twisted, for describing the truth could

destruct her hubby? s repute, but lying agencies interrupting her grave curse to

God. Because she is altruistic, Elizabeth chooses to lie and salvage her hubby, but

possibly reprobate herself to hell for such a wickedness. This scene indicates dramatic

sarcasm, for Proctor knows that which Elizabeth is non cognizant of, and this is that

he has already? confessed it? ( 1148 ) . The tribunal jails Proctor ; Elizabeth

Proctor? s selfless act blowbacks. Proctor? s tragic flaw of criminal conversation indirectly

causes his jailing and gives him the repute of a prevaricator. The tribunal views his

existent truth as a prevarication and believes he defies authorization. Although John Proctor does

non genuinely defy authorization in this scene of the drama, for he tells the truth and

his married woman lies, he challenges control in many other cases. John Proctor

unmaskings hubris through his hatred of Reverend Parris. Hubris is puting 1s ego

equal to authorization or to God, and it is a necessary trait of the tragic hero.

John Proctor proclaims that he does non travel to Church, an act the tribunal and

townspeople position as a rebellion on the domination of God, because the Reverend

Parris is corrupt. Parris is avaricious and cares more about the interest of his

repute that the wellness of his ain girl. Proctor resents the Church

because Parris runs it. In the eyes of functionaries, this insouciant carelessness of God

bends Proctor into an unchristian, iniquitous Rebel. Though Proctor? s grounds for

ignoring the Church are rather sensible, people do non accept them in this

clip of Satans and immorality. The tragic hero non merely places himself as an peer of

God, but as an equal of tribunal authorization every bit good. John Proctor insults the tribunal

by rupturing up a hunt warrant, and functionaries subsequently accuse him of seeking to

subvert the tribunal because of his controversial grounds against Abigail and

the misss. When Herrick and Cheever appear at the Proctor place to gaining control and

take away Elizabeth Proctor for witchery, Proctor smartly protests, for he

knows that Abigail Williams created a strategy in order to acquire rid of his married woman.

John Proctor does non digest this ; because he is a tragic hero, he does non

let another psyche to endure for his error. As a challenge to tribunal authorization,

he tears up the hunt warrant ( 1127 ) . This act escalates the war between

Proctor and the tribunal. Proctor will travel to the extreme, even if it means

penalty by decease, in order to salvage his married woman. Proctor delivers to the tribunal

his statement that Abigail and the other misss are frauds. He has no desire to

conveying Forth this information because he knows it will merely anger Abigail and

most likely ruin him because of Abi

gail? s power. His statement is necessary,

though, to the redemption of his married woman. When Danforth hears John Proctor? s

flooring disclosure that the misss are frauds, he is outraged and so dismisses

this grounds as an effort to subvert the tribunal ( 1134 ) . Danforth feels he

must take Abigail? s statement over that of Proctor? s, for otherwise the

townsfolk might see Danforth as a liquidator because of his orders to put to death

those people accused of witchery by Abigail and the misss. In this instance,

Danforth bestows upon John Proctor the image of a adult male of hubris in order to

protect his ain repute. Proctor knows that Danforth will ne’er accept his

grounds of the misss as frauds, and this in portion causes his declaration. Near

the terminal of The Crucible, Proctor believes that he has lost the conflict of

witchery. He feels there is no hope that the tribunal will liberate him from

executing, and he panics. A individual can be strong for his full life, but when

the minute of decease comes, he will check. If given a pick between life, but by

prevarication, or decease, but through award, the determination is made more hard through

the craze experienced. John Proctor chooses life, though he knows this agency

a life of sorrow and dishonesty. Proctor does, nevertheless, recognize his error in

taking this kind of life over an honest decease before it is excessively late.

Proctor? s determination to finally take a decease of award over a life of shame

is the major reversal of the drama. Reversal is the alteration of luck that

consequences from acknowledgment, or learned cognition that consequences in a alteration of

action in a character, of any tragic hero. John Proctor? s acknowledgment is his

find that he contains goodness. ? For now I do believe I see some shred of

goodness in John Proctor? ( 1166 ) . When Proctor believes that he is a adult male of no

decency, he chooses to populate by squealing witchery, since this prevarication fits his

personality. Through Elizabeth? s support, this tragic hero sees the goodness

he holds and acts on it by reversal and by taking an honest decease. He

realizes that this action is one that would convey about Elizabeth? s

forgiveness, and her clemency is what he searches for throughout the drama. John

Proctor? s sudden alteration through acknowledgment and reversal is a major crisis in

the drama, and from this stems his calamity. Proctor? s calamity is that

he will hang. The calamity is the shuting portion of a play that consequences from

the crisis. Because John Proctor decides to deny witchery through his

acknowledgment and reversal, he finds calamity by his sentence to hang. The

calamity besides ties up the play and gives a greater accent that John

Proctor is a tragic hero, for he accepts his decease with silence and shows a

capacity for enduring. Another quality of the tragic adult male is belief in his ain

freedom, show by John Proctor in the calamity. Proctor? s freedom is decease ;

decease is his flight from the Puritan universe which persecutes and punishes him

with calls of witchery. Overall, the calamity reveals the calamity and

unity of John Proctor, doing this character a tragic hero. John Proctor

shows that he is a tragic hero through his battles within the drama. He

battles with his wickedness of criminal conversation, for it causes interruptions in his bonds between

his married woman and Abigail. He grapples with authorization, for Proctor is non one who

listens to authority merely because it is the excepted thing to make. He besides

faces decease because he chooses to be a baronial adult male and denies all charges of

witchery. Though John Proctor is non a perfect adult male, his beliefs and values are

in the right topographic point ; he listens to his bosom. When his caput tells him to listen

to the tribunal because it is the jurisprudence, and when Hale tells him to take to populate as

an accused enchantress, Proctor does non listen because he knows that these Acts of the Apostless are

non in his best involvement. He follows his psyche, a lesson the whole universe should

learn to follow.

Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. Literature, Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes.

Ed. Ellen Bowler, et Al. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1999.