Delayed Gratification Essay Sample

Why should people be able to prorogue their desire? Desire is a sense of trusting for something. Scientists have discovered that if people could command their interior desire. they would be more likely to hold self-denial. higher SAT tonss and are more successful. Delayed satisfaction is a person’s ability to command his/her desire for something for a period of clip. The Marshmallow Experiment conducted by psychologist Walter Mischel of Stanford University in 1972. This experiment tests the self-denial that develops in kids age four to six. The experimenter does non state the kids when they will come back to honor each of them another marshmallow if they resist the enticement of being alone with a marshmallow. As a consequence. some kids could non reject the enticement and ate the marshmallow on the tabular array. However. some would happen their ain ways to seek to finish the ends. which is to digest the “suffering” and delay for another marshmallow. For case. some of them would “cover their eyes with their custodies or turn around so that they can’t see the tray. others start kicking the desk. or tug on their pigtails. or stroke the marshmallow as if it were a bantam stuffed animate being. ”

The consequence is that one tierce of the kids ate the marshmallow right off after Dr. Mischel left. One tierce of the kids waited for a piece. but they ate the marshmallow finally. The remainder of the kids. which is besides one tierce of all. waited till the last proceedingss and got another marshmallow. Therefore. the experiment is proving if those kids ( participants ) can detain their satisfaction by making a similar experiment. Ben Zur and Breznitz studied the consequence of clip force per unit area on decision-making in 1981. The participants were asked to do determinations between gambles under three different degrees of clip force per unit area. The consequence is that participants make less hazardous picks under high clip force per unit area. The experiment indicates that people choose different degrees of hazardous pick depends on degrees of clip force per unit area. It suggests that people tend non to be excessively hazardous under clip force per unit area. Additionally. the experiment illustrates that people think negative thoughts when they are under high clip force per unit area.

Therefore. the experiment demonstrates that clip plays a important function in human’s ideas and behaviours. To look into the relationship between delayed satisfaction and clip. the perceivers decide to make this experiment. After analyzing two experiments that were listed supra. the perceivers are inspired to happen out the relationship between clip and the delayed satisfaction. Since clip really affect people’s head and behaviour. in this experiment. the perceivers are traveling to see how clip can impact one’s delayed satisfaction. The perceivers suggest that if the participants are allowed cognizing how much clip left they need to keep on their desire. they will be more likely to wait ; the participants who do non cognize the exact clip that they have to wait will be more likely to give up on waiting.

Mentions

DrReynolds. “On Becoming Babywise: The Stanford Marshmallow Study. ” The Stanford Marshmallow Study. 8 Sept. 2008. Web. 04 June 2012. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. smartparentshealthykids. com/blog/ ? p=412 & gt ; . Lehrer. Jonah. “The Secret of Self Control. ” The New Yorker. The New Yorker. 18 May 2009. Web. 3 June 2012. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. newyorker. com/reporting/2009/05/18/090518fa_fact_lehrer & gt ; . Svenson. Ola. and John A. Maule. Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. Google. 30 Nov. 1993. Web. 04 June 2012. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //books. Google. com. tw/books? hl=zh-TW & gt ; .

Research Question
Will one’s delayed satisfaction affected by clip?

Hypothesis
The perceivers suggest that if the participants are allowed cognizing how much clip left they need to keep on their desire. they will be more likely to wait ; the participants who do non cognize the exact clip that they have to wait will be more likely to give up on waiting.

Experiment
Test participant’s ability to prorogue his/her desire and to detect if his/her desire will be affected by clip.

Variables and Group
Independent Variable: looking at first marshmallow and delay for 10 proceedingss Dependent Variable: the ability to prorogue their desire to eat the first marshmallow in order to acquire the 2nd marshmallow Constant Variable: the marshmallow. the clip. the surrounding. the temperature Experimental Group: cognize how much clip they have to wait to acquire the 2nd marshmallow Control Group: did non cognize how much clip they need to wait to acquire the 2nd marshmallow Participants

10 male and 6 female

Testing Fortunes
Participants will be tested in group of two. Experimental group will be able to cognize how much clip left to wait. Control group will non be allowed to cognize how much how much clip left to wait.

What Will Be Measured
The consequence of cognizing how much clip left has on experimental group’s ability of delayed satisfaction.

Time
It will take about 10 proceedingss to prove on each participant.

Materials
* A battalion of marshmallow
* 40 home bases
* 40 kids
* Camera
* Timer

Procedure
1 ) Led each kid to a certain schoolroom.
2 ) Put a marshmallow on a home base in forepart of the kid.
3 ) Tell him or her ( the first group ) . “Here’s a trade. Here’s a marshmallow. You can either delay. and I’ll bring you another one when I come back. so you will hold two. or you can eat it now. but you can’t hold another one. Okay. so I’ll be back. ” 4 ) ( The 2nd group ) Tell him or her. “Here’s a trade. Here’s a marshmallow. You can either delay till the timer Michigan. and I will be back to give you another one. or you can eat it before the timer Michigan. but you will non be able to acquire a 2nd marshmallow.

Consequence
In the experiment group. kids were asked to prorogue their desire to eat marshmallow for 10 proceedingss. but they were notified how much clip left to keep their desire. Harmonizing to the information. nine out of eight kids can keep their privation. In the recording picture. most of the kids still try to eat the marshmallow. However. every clip when they were informed how much clip left to wait. they tended to set the marshmallow down and make up one’s mind to wait longer. One participant ate the marshmallow. However. he ate it before the experimenter went in and told him how many clip left. In the control group. kids are asked to prorogue their desire to eat marshmallow for 10 proceedingss without cognizing when to halt. Harmonizing to the information. three out of eight participants eat the marshmallow. In the recording picture. most of the kids smell the marshmallow foremost. and so cream it. Some took little bites. During these 10 proceedingss. most of the kids try to deflect themselves by playing about or looking about.

Analyzing Consequences
The information is analyzed by pie graph to demo the per centum of participants in the experimental group and control group.

Discussion by Ching Yang
This survey designed an experiment to prove on people’s delayed satisfaction. The experiment gave kids a marshmallow and asked them to wait for sum of clip. If they can prorogue their desire to eat the marshmallow. they will be awarded another marshmallow. However. if the childs eat the marshmallow before the clip. they won’t be punished. In this experiment. all participants are aged from four to seven. Researcher separated them into two group. experimental group and control group. In the experimental group. all the kids wait for 10 proceedingss. However. the research worker would come into the room and told the childs how much clip was staying when they have five proceedingss left and reminded them when they got one minute left.

In the control group. all the kids were under a circumstance of non cognizing how much clip they have to wait. Children in the control group besides wait for 10 proceedingss. However. they didn’t know when the experiment would halt. The hypothesis of this research is that participants who know how much clip they have to wait will be able to command and detain their desire. Most of the kids in the experiment tend to smell. lick and take little bite of the marshmallow. Some even dance or sing. The consequence shows that 1 out of eight participants in the experimental group ate the marshmallow and 3 out of eight participants in the control group ate the marshmallow. The consequence supports the hypothesis.

This survey benefits people by allowing people know that in different state of affairs. people tend to hold different ability to detain their desire. Peoples tend to widen their clip for waiting when they have sense how much clip they have to wait.

There are several restrictions on this research. First. the figure of participants should be augmented. In a kindergarten. the sum of childs runing from four twelvemonth old to seven twelvemonth old is limited. Besides. to organize with children’s agendas. Numberss of childs that can be participated are besides limited. There are merely 16 kids participated in this experiment. The truth will be higher if the Numberss of participants increased. Second. the status should besides be improved. Due to the restriction. the experiments ( experimental group and control group ) were held in two different suites. The status of the experiment should be perfectly same.

For the farther research. scientists and research worker can research on how group can impact this experiment. Researcher can set two kids or more in one room and detect how relationship can interfere people’s hold satisfaction. If one kid ate the marshmallow. will the other kid be affected?

Discussion by Angela Chang
This survey tests the relationship between clip and delayed satisfaction on three to six old ages old kids. At first. each kid was given a marshmallow. The perceiver told the kids ( participants ) that they can either delay and acquire another marshmallow by the clip the perceiver came back. or they can eat it whatever they want but get merely one marshmallow. Then. the perceiver left the room and started to enter participants’ reactions.

The first group. control group. did non cognize when the perceiver would come back. The 2nd group. experimental group. knew how many proceedingss would the perceiver come back. The hypothesis of this experiment is that the participants are allowed cognizing how many proceedingss left they need to keep on their desire. they will be more likely to wait ; the participants who do non cognize the exact clip that they have to wait will be more likely to give up and eat the marshmallow. Harmonizing to the information. in the experimental group. the consequences show that eight 9th kids tended to wait longer when they are informed how many proceedingss left. On the other manus. the control group. the consequence suggests that merely five out of eight kids can wait until the perceiver came back and acquire another marshmallow. The consequences match the hypothesis. In this experiment. it is evident to see that delayed satisfaction can be longer if the participants cognize how much clip left.

This survey benefits people that people can make more research on the relationship between different factors and delayed satisfaction. Peoples should hold more information. cognition. and experiments on delayed satisfaction in the hereafter.

There are several restrictions of this experiment. First. the participants were non wholly in the same room. which means they are non in the same status. and it might impact the consequence. The participants should all be in the same status. Second. participants should be more than 20 people. The experiment will be more accurate with more participants. However. in our experiment. the instructor in the kindergarten could non supply so many childs for this experiment. Third. the age of participants in this experiment was four to six twelvemonth old. However. the experiment will be better if the participants can all in the same age.

For the farther research. the experiment should prove on more kids in the same age. Besides. the experiment can besides prove on the relationship between children’s delayed satisfaction and other factors. such as conditions and genders. And besides. the participants should all in the same testing room to take down the factors every bit much as possible.