Ethical Dilemma Worksheet Essay Sample

What is the ethical issue or job? Identify the issue compactly. The ethical issues is make up one’s minding instead the officers should collar the suspect and prevarication on the study. The officers believed the person was driving under the influence. The felt he was a hazard to himself and everyone else around him. The job is before the jurisprudence enforcement officer can do an apprehension at that place has to be a clear mark of likely cause if an officer disregards to happen likely cause before collaring the person when the test comes along. the instance will be dismissed in tribunal and the wrongdoer will walk off free. Besides. the married woman merely states she was scared and called the constabulary. Harmonizing to “Domestic Assault Laws” ( 2013 ) . “You can be charged with domestic assault for a scope of actions. from endangering a partner or girlfriend to assailing a household member with a deathly arm. It isn’t necessary for you to wound the other individual to be charged with domestic force. ” Domestic Assault / Domestic force Torahs: The felon charges and possible punishments in Texas ) . What should the moral agent make? What are the most of import facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical determination presented?

Include any of import possible economic. societal. or political force per unit areas. and exclude inconsequential facts. Officer Rook and Officer Nixon arrive at the scene of a domestic maltreatment call. When the officers arrived the noticed a adult male faltering to the front door of his place and dropping his auto keys on the land. The goon of the auto was warm but the couple both say no 1 had been driving for hours. The officers did non really detect the fishy driving the normal policy would be non to collar the suspect for a DUI but despite policy the constabulary officers decide to collar the fishy anyway. Upon geting back at the constabulary station Officer Rook writes a true study refering the night’s events and turned it in to the prosecuting officer. Later Officer Nixon took back the study and changes the portion where Officer Rook had relayed that the officers had non really seen the DUI suspect driving the auto.

The prosecuting officer who has antecedently reviewed the study noticed the disagreement and the changes that had been made by Nixon. Identify each claimant ( cardinal histrion ) who has an involvement in the result of this ethical issue. From the position of the moral agent—the single contemplating an ethical class of action—what duty is owed to the claimant? Why? Claimant Duty ( owed to thePerspective ( What does the claimant hope will go on? ) ( cardinal histrion ) claimant ) Battered married woman To be safe The married woman wants for her hubby to come place and kip the intoxicant off. She does non desire to contend with him. Police officers truth Officer Nixon should non distort the study which in bend he should non collar the suspect without sufficient grounds. Suspect to make the right thing The suspect does non desire to be penalized for imbibing and drive nor domestic force.

Measuring Options

What are two options for the scenario? One option can be a wild card that you normally may non see an option because of possible deductions. Both should be within free will and command of the same moral agent. Alternative A Alternative B Do non collar suspect and alternatively supply intervention Arrest suspect Respond to the following inquiries based on your developed options. Alternative A Alternative B What are the best- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this Best instances: The suspect will hold consequence Best instances: There would less people harmed in alternate? intervention and halt imbibing and drive and the event the suspect hit person while imbibing he will be able to accommodate with his married woman. and driving. Worse instances: The intervention does non work and Worse instances: Suspect is released and guiltless person is badly hurt. members of society are harmed when the suspect drives once more while imbibing. Will anyone be harmed if this option is chosen? If so. how When utilizing this alternate society and the will they be harmed?

See In this alternate no 1 would be harmed suspects’ married woman would be safe while the fishy households and derivative effects. but alternatively the condemnable suspect will acquire thewas arrested necessary aid they require to go more productive members of society. He will be able to understand the danger he could hold caused. Would honouring an thought or value—such Officer Nixon is non honouring the rule of as personal. professional. or the condemnable justness system by distorting a religious—make the option In some instances people’s values could play a constabulary study. His actions can defile the invalid? function on instead this option is valid. repute of the condemnable justness system injury Valuing the demand for rehabilitation or The suspect is protected by the Bill of Rights requital will out weight this.

Professional there is no evidences for apprehension. Are at that place any regulations. Torahs. or I do non believe there is any Torahs other than rules that support the The 14th Amendment provinces “Due procedure. in Restoration that would fall for this option? Are at that place regulations. Torahs. the context of the United States. refers to alternative. The regulation is to assist the person or rules that make the how and why Torahs are enforced. It applies to instead than taking so locking them off. alternate invalid? State the regulation all individuals. citizen or foreigner. every bit good as to or rule and bespeak if it corporations. ” ( “U. S. Constitution” . 2010 invalidates or supports the This will do the apprehension of the fishy option. invalid

Using Ethical Guidelines

See each ethical guideline and explicate whether it would back up or reject your alternate. Guidelines based on the action itself Alternative A Alternative B Should this alternate go a regulation or policy that everyone in thisyes no state of affairs should follow in similar state of affairss in the hereafter? ( Kant ) Does this alternate consequence in utilizing any individual as a agency to an endno yes without consideration for his or her basic unity? ( Kant ) Is the purpose of this action free from vested involvement or subterranean yes no motivation? ( Kant’s well will ) Make this alternate demonstrate a echt concern for others yes no affected by the determination. and is the moral bureau reacting to a perceived demand? Guidelines based on effects Alternative A Alternative B Is the good that consequences from this alternate outweighed by the Yes No possible injury that might be done to others? ( Mill’s harm rule )

Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? No ( causal injury ) No Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenceless? No No ( paternalism ) To what grade is this alternate based on the moral agent’s own Not based on the moral agent’sNot based on the moral agent’s best involvement? ( ethical egoism ) ain involvements ; based on the ain involvements ; based on the best involvements of the fishy best involvements of society Which option will bring forth the greatest benefit—or the least Alternate A will bring forth sum of harm—for the greatest figure of people? Select merely one the greatest benefit. option. ( utilitarianism )

Ethical Decision Making

Choose to continue with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explicate the grounds for your determination. I would take to continue with option A. When taking option A the suspect is able to be helped. He can understand that combat is spouse can take him to clip in prison and he can even lose the right to transport a gun. He will besides see that driving and driving can do the life of many guiltless bystanders The rights of the suspect will non be violated by false imprisonment and the officer will non be distorting papers to colorabate his narrative.

Mentions:

Domestic Assault Laws. ( 2013 ) . Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mytexasdefenselawyer. com/texas-criminal-laws-penalties/domestic-assault-laws/

University of Phoenix. ( na ) . Law Enforcement Scenario. Retrieved from University of Phoenix. CJA/324 web site.

U. S. Constitution. ( 2010 ) . Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. usconstitution. net/consttop_duep. hypertext markup language