Food Habits of the Elderly Essay Sample

Definition of foodways: it “…generally refers to ways in which a distinct group selects. prepares. consumes and otherwise reacts to and uses parts of the available nutrient supply” ( Wahlqvist et al. . 1991:164 ) Aims:

* Analysis of the significance of foodways for societal histrions in general * Significance of nutrient for the aged ( migrators ) concentrating on their marginalized societal location * Implication of foodways of the aged

* Meaning of the dominant medical system and dietetic guideline: State hegemony over single societal histrions Chief statements:
* For the aged. nutrient plays an particularly of import function for their liberty and independency and inclusion in society in general

Control over nutrient buying and ingestion “can go a major concern for older people as symbolic of independent living” ( McKie. Linda p. 529. 1999 ) .

“The buying. readying and helping of nutrient all require a certain grade of physical strength and mental verve on the portion of the individual responsible. Not surprisingly. aged people are all more likely to miss such abilities as a consequence of illness” ( Van Eeuwijk. Peter 2007 )

Joint day-to-day repasts serve as “important spheres of societal interaction and information sources” for the aged ( Van Eeuwijk. Peter 2007 ) .

“Involvement in societal webs through shopping and nutrient activities was of positive benefit to their well-being” ( McKie. Linda p. 533. 1999 )

* Different degrees of entree to nutrient resources can cast visible radiation on the bing power construction in a larger context in the society: Depending on the age. gender. race or ethnicity. category. etc. persons will hold different degree of entree to nutrient.

Hunger is the absolute mark of impotence ( Counihan. qtd in Van Eeuwijk. 2007 )

* Food can function as an instrument for exercising power and control * Majority of the aged might prefer more traditional nutrient alternatively of ready-made merchandises or western manner nutrient * Does being aged mean that they have particular dietetic demands? It is necessary to re-consider the dominant medical system and dietetic guideline as a mechanism of exerting province hegemony over single societal histrions.

Structure:
* Introduction about the dynamic relationship between nutrient and individuality * Food as an instrument for exercising power and control
* Food insecurity of the aged
* Implication of nutrient wonts of migrator aged?

Literature:
Drumhead 1.
Peter new wave Eeuwijk. « The power of nutrient: mediating societal relationships in the attention of inveterate sick aged people in urban Indonesia » . Anthropology of nutrient [ Online ] . S3 | December 2007. Online since 21 March 2008. connexion on 08 January 2013. Uniform resource locator: hypertext transfer protocol: //aof. reviews. org/2052 * Meaning of nutrient: Beginning for coherency and individuality

* Access to nutrient is unequal for each person and nutrient can work as an instrument for
manifesting and exercising power.
. Power relation between health professional and the ill aged
Those who receives more support and attention exert less power * Severe job of malnutrition of the aged
“Many older people do non hold entree even to the most basic demand of all – food”
( HelpAge International. 2002:24. qtd. in Van Eeuwijk )
. Causes of the malnutrition are poorness. societal exclusion. sick wellness. disablement. unequal
gender dealingss and the elderly’s marginalized place as net consumer in family harmonizing to Van Eeuwijk

. Even look of complain about the nutrient reflects gender-specific facet of power
Male aged complains more frequently than female aged
* Household Production of Health: Stressing the Role of the family in supplying nutrition required for the attention of the aged ill * Information on survey design ( chapter 15 )
* Importance of the readying of nutrient in Elder attention activities * Dependence on others for the demand of nutrient is a beginning of feeling of shame for some aged

In Indonesia
* Sharing nutrient is the most of import juncture for socialising for the aged. Meal clip is regarded as “an indispensable precaution against exclusion. isolation and neglect” ( Van Eeuwijk. 2007 ) and works as a beginning of obtaining information of outer universe and a platform for communicating. Besides fixed meal clip brings an order to the humdrum day-to-day life of sick aged people. * But some aged are non allowed to fall in the household repast clip due to their physical restraints or due to the active prohibition of other household members because of their bad table manners. * Who provides nutrient for the aged?

. Self-preparation means a certain grade of liberty and independency
. Merely by close-relatives. while dependability of nutrient relationship can be established merely by emotional and physical intimacy.
. ”Feeding is perceived as both an confidant and a humiliating act” ( Van Eeuwijk. 2007 ) . * Social dimension of nutrient and senior attention
. Trust is a requirement in the relationship of nutrient supplier ( health professional ) and nutrient receiving system ( care-receiver. aged )

. Health professionals exercise societal power over their aged patient through the control of their diet which requires particular attending.
“Controlling while giving”
. In supplying attention for the aged. there is an increasing degree of “pressure from professional wellness governments in term of following with biomedically prescribed healthy nutrient and nutrient as medical specialty. ” ( Van eeuwijk. 2007 )

Drumhead 2.
Fischler. Claude. Food. ego and individuality. Social Science Information 1988 27:275. DOI:10. 1177/053901888027002005 * “Food is cardinal to our sense of identity” ( Fischler. p. 275 ) * Objective of the article: Survey about how nutrient is related to individuality formation * Diverse relationship of the human being to nutrient

. Biological. cultural. nutritionary. symbolic. single. corporate. psychological. societal * Problematization of separation in the survey of nutrient for the human being between difficult scientific discipline and soft scientific discipline ( natural vs. societal ) and claims necessity of using “integrative” attack alternatively. Human being is omnivore so the pick of nutrient and integrating of nutrient into the ego ( harmonizing to Fischler’s term. incorporation ) of human being is laden with significance and designation of nutrient dramas an of import function in the building of our individuality. “…if we do non cognize what we eat. how can we cognize what we are? ” ( p. 282 ) * The omnivore’s paradox: “lies in the tenseness. the oscillation between the two poles of neophobia and neophilia” ( p. 278 ) = & gt ; human being demands to be advanced and conservative at the same clip in its nutrient choice to last. should possess “innovative prudence” * Human group’s culinary art as the solution of the omnivore’s paradox. * “We go what we eat. Incorporation is a footing of individuality.

The German stating. “Man ist. was adult male isst” . is literally. biologically true” ( Fischler. p. 279 ) * Incorporation of nutrient in human organic structure as the footing of corporate individuality and distinctness. “Food and culinary art are a quite cardinal constituent of the sense of corporate belonging. ” ( p. 280 ) “Human existences mark their rank of a civilization or a group by asseverating the specificity of what they eat. or more exactly by specifying the distinctness. the difference of others. ” ( p. 280 ) * Analysis of the procedures of nutrient designation and the building of the eater’s individuality. * What factors should be considered in specifying “proper food” ? . age. sex. rank. position. societal function ( circumstance ) . chronology ( clip of twenty-four hours. twenty-four hours of the hebdomad. season ) * Cooking. the universe and the eather: the identificatory map of culinary art. Cooking enables the designation of nutrient

* Problematization of “food without identity” of modern epoch due to the increasing industrialisation of nutrient production and turning ingestion of ready-made groceries.

Drumhead 3.
Lynn. Lois L. Kang. Keum Jee & A ; Elaine Kris Ludman. Korean Aged: Diet. Food Beliefs. and Acculturation. Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly. v. 19 ( 2 ) . 2000. pp. 1-15.

* Problem of the minority aged immigrant population: nutritionally vulnerable * The writers claim that Koreans hold a peculiarly strong cultural individuality and nutrient wonts are an of import portion of the Korean cultural individuality. * Koreans hold strong belief in food’s medicative map. e. g. Ginseng for the aged to construct strength and increase energy * Comparative survey of the Korean-American aged in New York and Korean elderly in Seoul to understand similarities and differences between them and place dietetic socialization tendency.

* Research method: questionnaire about wellness. eating out. breakfast nutrients. traditional medical specialty nutrients. and a 24-hour callback * Korean-American aged were more likely to devour “Western style” breakfast nutrients. eat out in fast nutrient eating houses. and usage multivitamins. More topics in the Republic of Korea recommended nutrients such as ginseng for wellness. All topics consumed kimchee and rice at least one time in the 24-hour callback. * Harmonizing to the writers. while some specific cultural traits remain in diet and nutrient beliefs of aged Korean immigrants. other dietetic alterations are non limited to topographic point or age but they are the consequence of changeless alterations in our societies in general. * Significance of the survey: the survey consequence should be applied for the background information for wellness practicians in handling the wellness jobs of clients. ( understanding of the dietetic consumptions and nutrient beliefs )

Questions for treatment
* Let me reiterate the inquiry made by Fischler in his article Food. Self and Identity. He claims that the trouble in placing nutrient points in modern epoch makes us being insecure about ourselves. that is. we might lose certainty of one is oneself. Can we be in danger of losing control of ourselves. in other words. our individualities through what we eat? Do you hold to Fischler’s statement that current increasing degree of involvement in nutrient labelling of ingredients. in particular diet and culinary art are marks of our purpose to recover order in our mundane feeding? * What about those who are socially marginalized such as the ( sick ) elderly in instance they lose control over what they eat? Will they feel like losing control over themselves? Let us believe once more about the statement raised by Scots aged that for them. readying of repast by themselves means autonomy and kind of independency.

Most of surveies about nutrient wonts of aged have been done in nutritionary scientific discipline and have dealt with possible dietetic jobs due to the alteration on their nutrient wonts ( Backgrounds: Socialization. Modernisation. etc ) to do suggestion for future wellness plans.