National Language Essay Research Paper Good MorningRecently
National Language Essay, Research Paper
Good Morning
Recently the United States Congress has been debating whether or non to declare that English is the national linguistic communication of the United States and that all direction in public schools is in English. There is no inquiry what the linguistic communication of this state is, it is irrefutably English, it was the linguistic communication of our Establishing Fathers and the linguistic communication that the Declaration of Independence was written in, every bit good as the United States Constitution. I resolutely believe that the United States Congress should do this declaration. There are of class other affairs at manus with learning English to non-English speech production people.
As we have seen in states like Belgium and Canada, opposing language-speaking sides argue over what the official linguistic communication should be. This has lead to tremendous divisiveness in those states and could take to their splitting up into separate states. This is peculiarly true of Canada where the French-speaking population of the state of Quebec is sing splintering from the remainder of Canada, where most people speak English. The authorities of Canada has spent 1000000s of dollars on bilingual instruction, which however has caused the polarisation of society. Harmonizing to a Canadian observer, Fred Hamilton, it costs with about 30 million people 350 million dollars a twelvemonth to keep a satisfactory bilingual instruction system. It could be the United States ten times that sum. Do we desire our state to be divided every bit much as Canada is because of linguistic communication? And in the instance of Canada we are merely speaking about the division caused by two linguistic communications, viz. , English and Gallic, but if in the United States direction is given in all languages other than English, so ten or more linguistic communications may hold to be taught. Do we truly want this to go on here?
Suppose everyone went to different categories everyday. For case, the Chinese kids go to their categories, the Russians to theirs, and Spanish to theirs and the English talkers go to their Standard English categories. What is traveling to go on to the relationship between different cultural groups? They will merely go farther and farther apart. This is what bilingual instruction is making to our kids, segregating the state. Haven? T you seen all those commercials about everybody being different and to acquire along, like on Nickelodeon? Well if we are split up so much we will non even know the other childs. If Congress eventually declares that English be the official linguistic communication, the state will go closer and racial favoritism will decrease, because everyone will be able to talk the same linguistic communication. The lone job is learning everybody English.
If good occupations and a
nice life style are wanted ( you know, the American dream ) , good English has to be fluently read, written and spoken. A non-English-speaking individual can? t merely hold the educational background and non cognize English fluently, because what would you be able to make to do a nice life. Therefore, larning English should be the chief end of all non-English-speaking people in this state. In bilingual instruction the kids learn simple surveies in their linguistic communication and are meant to change over them over to English, but usually they focus on the topics and bury about larning English. Harmonizing to the Federal Government? s Office of Bilingual Education, in the 1992-93 academic twelvemonth, 2.7 million school kids were classified as LEP, or? Low English Proficiency, ? out of a school population of 51.3 million. That is approximately five per centum, but this figure grows every twelvemonth. As a consequence many of these kids will non stop up with good occupations. We should avoid dumbing-down our citizenship criterions and prolong the English proficiency. The lone manner to make this is by learning English until the individual knows it fluently, and merely so can the individual go into mainstream English categories. The best manner to make this is by larning English half the twenty-four hours and taking normal categories like math and history, but in English, for the other half.
In the January 31, 1999 edition of New York Times Magazine, Nonna Yelan? s Russian category, Wang Ip? s Chinese category and Luisa Martinez? s Spanish-speaking categories are discussed. These are all bilingual instruction categories. In Nonna Yelan? s and Wang Ip? s categories, the kids dive right into English and go fluid really rapidly while larning topics like math and History in English. In Luisa Martinez? s Spanish-speaking category, the kids wear? t learn much English, but learn simple surveies in their ain linguistic communication. This is in portion because the Spanish-speaking kids did non hold every bit much instruction before as the Chinese and Russian did. The lone manner to manage this is by working harder on instructor English, non surveies in their native linguistic communication.
Merely after the non-speaking individual can fluently read, compose and talk English they will hold the chance to travel to good Colleges and acquire good occupations. Therefore larning English is their chief end in school. The January 12, 1999 edition of the New York Times claims that 22 provinces have already made English their official linguistic communication, hopefully more provinces will follow. Congress? s declaration will non merely assist non-English speech production people assimilate into English speech production civilization, but will convey the state closer as a state. We will non hold jobs like Canada and Belgium over our state? s linguistic communication.
I hope you find my statement compelling.
Thank You
