Philosophical Issues Surrounding Aristotles Final Cause Essay Sample
What philosophical issues arise around Aristotles concluding cause when applied to human existences? The concluding cause harmonizing to Aristotle is the intent for an object. for illustration. the concluding intent of a chair would be to sit. This is a straightforward rule when applied to adult male made objects. because they all have an obvious Godhead and that Godhead makes them for a intent.
Aristotle besides said that the concluding cause could be applied to natural things. like trees. animate beings and worlds. This is where many people believe Aristotle made a cardinal error. How can you specify the intent of an animate being or a tree? This causes a job when you try to use the concluding cause to human existences. The concluding cause would so connote that we have a specific intent. an ultimate end so to talk. The concluding cause is non so straightforward in a natural sense. it has no unequivocal intent. no program or end. The concluding cause of a natural thing is whatever comes at the terminal of a natural procedure. for illustration the concluding cause of reproduction of two Canis familiariss is a puppy. the concluding cause of that puppy would so to develop into a Canis familiaris. The same theory can be applied to worlds.
This so suggests that we do non hold a intent or program in life but that our intent is to merely ‘exist’ . From this we could say that the concluding cause of natural things is its signifier. this though in the instance of natural things is non the same as form. the signifier can be related to its map. For this we need to interrupt the concluding cause down. For illustration we can look at the single concluding causes of the constituents in our organic structure i. e the concluding cause of our lungs is breath. Jointly so the concluding causes or map of our variety meats is our endurance. Aristotle so says that our concluding cause is to make typically as any species does. to last and to boom. The Philosophic issues that arise out of this can be used to oppugn the being of God. for illustration as a sculpturer sculpts in order to detect and bask his creative activity as an object of beauty. so excessively could it be said that God is our ‘sculptor’ and that nature is an object of beauty. Another philosophical statement that could originate from this is the statement that as our concluding cause is merely survival so our being has no intent or higher ends.
