Terror of Examinations Essay Sample

Parents send their boies and girls to schools and colleges to acquire instruction. Teachers work twelvemonth in and twelvemonth out to carry through the undertaking which society entrusts to them. Students are expected to analyze difficult throughout the session. If no scrutinies were to be held sporadically. neither instructors nor pupils would cognize the consequence of their attempts The. Besides this. scrutiny present a end before pupils so that they know the sum of work which must be put in within a definite period. Examinations inspire them. Their work becomes systematic and survey is done in a well-planned mode. So the scrutiny have a double map. First. they fix up a end and therefore direct the attempts of pupils and instructors towards its accomplishment.

Second. scrutinies lay down before the parent and society an appraisal of the advancement of pupils. In this manner scrutinies are necessary. Their topographic point and importance in the educational system can non be challenged. In malice of such importance of scrutinies. some people want them to be abolished. They feel that they are of no good and do positive injury to the cause of instruction. They encourage copying and the usage of unjust agencies. The pupils form the wont of rip offing. This is an utmost position. There are others. who consider scrutinies indispensable. They emphasize merely their virtues. But the truth lies between these two extremes. Let us foremost analyze the virtues of scrutinies. Examination is the clip of presentation. Students have to demo the testers that they know the replies to the inquiries set in the paper. They do so by showing their thoughts and feelings in the signifier of written replies. Those who have good power of look are ever gainers. To procure good Markss one should be able to show oneself good. Now. to derive success pupils try to develop this power. Furthermore. the nature of the present essay type scrutinies is such that. by itself. it develops this of import facet of personality.

While replying inquiries. pupils are required to give grounds for their positions. They can non make so without giving due thought to the assorted statements. They have to utilize their ain intelligence. In the limited clip which they get in the scrutiny. merely selected stuff can be given. They must go forth out much from the stuff which they know but which they consider useless from the point of position of the peculiar inquiry. In this manner. scrutinies develop the power of thought. logical thinking and doing right judgement. Preparations for the scrutinies have to be made in progress. No individual book can provide the needed stuff on a peculiar subject. Students have to confer with a figure of books for fixing the subjects exhaustively. They have to take out of the books they read a portion of the stuff and leave the remainder. They so arrange this stuff in a systematic order. Therefore. pupils get trained in choosing and set uping their stuff.

They learn to separate between the relevant and the irrelevant portion of the subject-matter. Examinations therefore. by repairing the end. supply inducement for difficult and regular work. This is merely the bright side of the image. Let us now besides examine the dark side. There is no such graduated table for taging the reply books as may give determinateness to the Markss scored by the pupils. The marker is strictly subjective. The same tester may give different Markss on the same reply book. if he is asked to analyze it at two different times. If the reply book of the same pupil is given to two different testers. they are likely to give rather different Markss. Therefore. the Markss obtained in the present essay type scrutinies are non the true trial of virtue. They are frequently rather misdirecting. To procure good Markss in the scrutiny. drawn-out replies are sometimes necessary. Keeping this in position. pupils cram up replies to different inquiries without understanding the sense and at times even without understanding the linguistic communication. Those who are good at jaming are ever benefited. Intelligent apprehension of the subject-matter is non increased. Students therefore become good parrots but hapless encephalons.

Everyone knows that the exclusive purpose of instruction these yearss is to go through the scrutiny. Students hanker after short cuts and inexpensive notes. ‘Guess papers’ . ‘Atom-Bomb of Success’ . ‘Twenty Four Hours before Examination’ . ‘Sure Success at Examinations’ . and the similar find favour with them. In fact. no love for cognition. or gustatory sensation for serious survey. is developed. One of the serious drawbacks of the scrutinies is that they fail to mensurate what they claim to step. Through a paper on Science. Geography. or History. the cognition of that peculiar topic is non tested. Language and look play an of import portion. One. who knows the capable affair well but is weak in Hindi or if one’s composing velocity is slow. will ne’er do good in the scrutiny. Furthermore. the inquiry documents do non cover the whole class. Everybody knows that the pupil. who has prepared three-fourth’s of the class exhaustively. but has neglected the staying one 4th. secures less Markss than the pupil who has staying one 4th. secures less Markss than the pupil who has prepared merely that one-quarter.

So we can state that the Markss obtained depend more on opportunity than on the true ability of the testees. After sing all the virtues and demerits of scrutinies. we can reason that scrutinies are a necessary immorality. They can non be wholly done away with. But the manner and the signifier in which they are held need reform. There are so many serious defects in the present system of scrutinies that their intent is wholly defeated. They fail in mensurating the advancement of pupils. Many ways of reforming the scrutiny system have been suggested. One is the scene of nonsubjective type inquiries. alternatively of the present system in which the inquiry require long. try type replies. In this manner. it becomes possible to cover the whole class and the personal factor is eliminated. This method has been used so far with success in medical and other competitory scrutinies. But its great draw-back is that it does non develop the expressive power of the pupils. Careful thought is necessary earlier nonsubjective trials are introduced in schools and colleges. Semester system i. e. the keeping of two scrutinies in one twelvemonth alternatively of one. has besides failed to work out the job.