What does Colonel Aponte represent about society? Essay Sample
How was your apprehension of cultural and contextual considerations of the work developed through the synergistic viva voce?
I found that the synergistic viva voce was really utile to understand the novelette and assorted messages/symbols that are portrayed. It helped me recognize many things about Chronicle of a Death Foretold and about Colombian civilization back at that clip since the novelette is set up in Colombia.
One of the first things we noticed were how honor and virginity in adult females played a large function in the basicss of the community and how killing for award was thought as a right thing. We besides understand that Colombia was and still is a vey spiritual state. This is portrayed by the act of Bayardo San Roman in declining Angela Vicario because he married her but she was non a virgin and as we all know. the bible clearly says that a Christian adult females must be virgin until the matrimony and if non the hubby was allowed to decline her or even kill her. Honor was besides really of import for Colombians. so of import that they would kill for it. This is portrayed by the Vicario brothers because of how for the award of their household and their sister they went and killed Santiago. and the interesting thing is that the slaying of Santiago Nasar is really based on a true slaying that took topographic point in Colombia.
Another motive that we explored was corruptness. What left me a spot amazed when I read the novelette was the fact that jurisprudence was corrupted in an unusual manner ; an illustration can be Officer Pornoy and how he did non make his occupation right in halting the Vicario Brothers. Peoples in the community recognized jurisprudence figures as such but didn’t respect them as such. in fact they treated them like they were merely normal people and “Officer” and “Mayor/Colonel” were merely labels. Labels are besides a really interesting factor in the novelette ; in fact. labels are given to everyone throughout the book. Some illustrations are Clotilde. who is labeled as the “milk store owner” . the twin brothers are labeled as “the bad cats. the killers” . Santiago is labeled as the “outsider. adult females deflowerer” and so on. The labels in the community are rather evidently used to separate the type of work that each individual does or what the individual does or has done. The inquiry is. have we missed something or did we happen everything at that place was to be found out and can we be certain? ?
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Colonel Aponte is the Mayor and Head of Police in his society and thereby he represents the jurisprudence. Obviously. there are some issues refering the manner he fulfills his responsibility in footings of the steps he takes to forestall the violent death of Santiago Nasar. The manner in which he enforces jurisprudence in seeking to forestall Santiago’s decease. is the manner that Garcia Marquez reveals to the reader how jurisprudence and belief systems are skewed.
One of the chief actions we know he takes in seeking to forestall Santiago’s decease is when he hears about the twin’s program and goes look for them. but so decides that they are of no existent injury. “When I saw them I thought they were nil but a brace of large four-flushers. ” he told me with his personal logic. “Because they weren’t every bit rummy as I thought. ” ( Garcia-Marquez. 2007: 56 ) . Colonel Aponte thought that the two brothers were merely bluffing and pranking them. By this citation. we can besides presume that the governments of the town had a sense of moral responsibility to let the slaying to take topographic point since everyone in the town knew that the brothers wanted to kill Santiago merely to support and continue their sister’s honor. However. this does non warrant Colonel Aponte’s actions since there is no such thing. to hold moral responsibility to let a slaying.
Furthermore. Colonel Aponte did non merely make up one’s mind that they are of no injury and merely “big bluffers” ( Garcia-Marquez. 2007: 56 ) . he besides decided non to follow the criterion jurisprudence processs “Nor did he interrogate them refering their purposes. but took away their knives and sent them off to kip. He treated them with the same confidence with which he had passed off his wife’s dismay. ” ( Garcia-Marquez. 2007: 56 ) . This citation clearly shows how wrong Colonel Aponte’s practical actions are. In the portion of the citation that says “Nor did he interrogate them” . the usage of a negative ‘nor’ and the usage of the word ‘interrogation’ makes the state of affairs seem really serious because Colonel Aponte did non interrogate them. What Garcia Marquez is uncovering is that it is a bad thing since that is what an officer of the jurisprudence is meant to make. amongst other things. Another really interesting portion of the quotation mark is “He treated them with the same confidence with which he had passed off his wife’s alarm” ; this can besides be seen as a bad thing that Garcia Marquez wanted the reader to research since Colonel Aponte treats the brothers like he is certain that nil is traveling to go on. The message Garcia Marquez exposes is how the jurisprudence processs are non followed or respected and he criticizes that the governments in this society are incapable of carry throughing their responsibility.
Another relevant action of Colonel Aponte that represents how skewed is authorization is when he decides to travel hold a expression at a Domino game instead than to travel instantly to salvage Santiago. “He promised to take attention of it at one time. but he went into the societal nine to look into on a day of the month for dominoes that dark. and when he came out once more the offense had already been committed. ” ( Garcia-Marquez. 2007: 58 ) Further cogent evidence is apparent in the of the deficiency committedness to his occupation and responsibility since he put a game of dominos before his responsibility and before a possible slaying ; which so took topographic point. “He promised to take attention of it at once” . is a really of import portion of this citation because as we so happen out he does non take attention of it instantly and what Garcia Marquez is seeking to expose to the readers’ eyes is how Colonel Aponte was non really dependable and trusty. This strongly encourages us to believe of how awful jurisprudence enforcement was and how the society was thereby affected by the weak sense of responsibility.
Through Colonel Aponte’s actions. Garcia Marquez is knocking authorization in this society because of the actions they take. particularly when warned about something or when it is said by them that something will be done instantly. since it is clearly non. Colonel Aponte’s function is to farther knock society. as he is an authorization figure who does non even transport out his responsibilities of jurisprudence hatchet man. which are non merely intend to do certain that people follow the jurisprudence but besides to safeguard the citizen’s life within the town. metropolis or country in which they have legal power. Real Authority does non look to exists. ‘Colonel’ is more of a mere rubric given to people that differentiates them for their occupation. but being a constabulary officer merely seems a occupation like another without existent relevancy as it should hold.
Law in ‘Chronicle of a Death Foretold’ is ‘corrupt’ . in the sense that people do non truly esteem it nor respect authorization figures. Garcia Marquez tries to convey how governments were non respected in Colombia. in fact being a Colonel or and Officer was merely a mere rubric that people did non esteem. or did to a certain point. Peoples did non talk to them respectfully. they spoke to them as if they were regular people and had no existent authorization. “It can’t be. because I took them away from them before directing them place to bed. ’ said the city manager. ‘It must be that you saw them before that. ’ ‘I saw them two proceedingss ago and they both had pig-killing knives. ’ Cristo Bedoya said. “ this citation is an illustration of duologue between the Colonel Aponte and Cristo Bedoya and as it is easy read. there is no usage of polite and respectful footings such as “Sir” or “Colonel” .
As it happens. the usage of “two proceedingss ago” high spots vividly how Cristo Beyoda is reasoning with Colonel Aponte and the usage of the word “both” is to stress even more that Beyoda saw both of the brothers with the knives which both consequence as an impolite thing to make. Besides. the usage of repeat of the word “them” gives a strong accent to the sentence “I took them away from them before directing them to bed” although with the usage of ‘them’ it refers to the brothers and the knives. two distinguishable things. the sentence structure makes it seem like the brothers and the knives are one thing. In all this. Colonel Aponte plays a function being the corrupt authorization. which does non look to truly implement his authorization decently over the society. Garcia Marquez through this is conveying the fact that. non merely were governments non respected. but besides governments like Colonel Aponte contribute to this by non making anything voluntarily or involuntarily to implement regard.
Through Colonel Aponte. things such as corruptness. deficiency of existent authorization power. untrustiness. deficiency of jurisprudence enforcement and of existent involvement in a adult male about to decease and more in a Domino game are conveyed. These things all together convey how authority systems in Gabriel Garcia’s novelette are skewed. Colonel Aponte is shown as being unconcerned with people’s good being in fact he fails in the purpose of maintaining the town in order and forestalling the slaying of an guiltless adult male from two other work forces. merely for an issue of award. This novelette was taken from an existent slaying that took topographic point in Colombia in 1951. in which a adult male called Cayetano Gentile Chimento was butchered with a matchet for ruining a adult female called Margarita. who had been returned to her household on her nuptials dark by her groom Miguel Reyes Palencia.
As it occurs besides in Garcia Marquez’s novelette. the 1s who killed Cayetano were the two brothers of Maria. which spent merely a few old ages in gaol for what was regarded as a offense of award. This narrative revolves around a slaying that happened 27 old ages before Garcia Marquez wrote the novella “Chronicle of a Death Foretold” and it involved people with whom Garcia Marquez was acquainted. Garcia Marquez’s purpose through this novelette was to knock Colombian governments and authorization figures. both of jurisprudence and faith. because of their deficiency of action. proper transporting out of their responsibility and for leting a slaying to go on because of honor.
Garcia-Marquez. Gabriel. 2007. Chronicle of a Death Foretold. Translated from Spanish by Gregory Rabassa. London: Penguin
