40 Acres And A Mule Essay Research

40 Estates And A Mule Essay, Research Paper

Drumhead

In the dictum of & # 8220 ; Particular Field Order No. 15 & # 8243 ; by General William T. Sherman,

Sherman gave a dictum that slaves could hold 40 estates and a mule since the proprietors of plantations in the South fled their land so the slaves can claim it as theirs. The former slaves would raise the harvests themselves and have the full land as their ain. The & # 8220 ; Proclamation of Amnesty & # 8221 ; by President Andrew Jackson did non back up Sherman & # 8217 ; s thought of land given to the former slaves. Jackson wanted to reconstruct authorization back to the U.S. so he gave forgiveness to all the Southern & # 8217 ; s that rebelled against the brotherhood and he wanted their land to be given back to the proprietors. General Rufus Saxton wrote a & # 8220 ; study & # 8221 ; refering how the southern inkinesss would react. He wanted to carry through the slaves hopes about acquiring land and he observed the positive side of acquiring the land to slaves. He saw the former slaves make colonies, they built schools, churches, roads and made huge betterments. & # 8220 ; The Abandoned Lands & # 8221 ; by Major General Oliver O. Howard talked about how Howard had to travel to the slaves and convert them to give up the land back to the proprietors because of the President & # 8217 ; s new policy. The Norfolk Virginian gave a statement about the & # 8220 ; Rebellion at Taylor & # 8217 ; s Farm. & # 8221 ; At Taylor & # 8217 ; s farm a meeting was made and several former slaves and white plantation proprietors talked about Taylor & # 8217 ; s farm and how the white proprietors wanted it back. The former slaves said they would contend for it because of the dictum made my Sherman the land was truly theirs. & # 8220 ; The Credit System & # 8221 ; by D. Augustus Straker gave insight about the recognition system that was created after the civil war to purportedly assist the former slaves. The system would give recognition to former slaves so that they could acquire agrarian tools and nutrient and etc. Merely the merchandiser that sold them all the points charged three times the existent monetary value so the former slave would hold to pay a batch more and would normally go in debt to the merchandiser the

following twelvemonth. Harmonizing to the Grimes Family, their “Sharecropping Contract” would be excessively difficult for former slaves to maintain up with if they wanted to portion land with the white plantation proprietor. If the former slave takes the contract but doesn’t fulfil it 100 % so the proprietor would ticket the individual and acquire rich off of them and the former slave would be in debt and have to remain on the farm.

Analysis

Some persons support land reform because they wanted to carry through the slaves hopes that they excessively could have at that place ain land and do a life on their ain. They saw that slaves would do colonies and supply for their ain without any aid. Other persons did non back up the thought of land reform because they felt that since the North had won the war the Southern & # 8217 ; s learned their lesson about non to arise so they should be given all their belongings back even though the slaves would of claimed the land as their ain. The persons that opposed the thought of giving land to the slaves made it hard for them to even acquire their ain secret plan of land. The thought of sharecropping and the recognition system looked appealing to many slaves so they tried the thought of both. Sharecropping allow the slave portion the land with the proprietor and they would divide the net incomes half manner. But first the slave would hold to travel to a merchandiser to buy all the equipment and points that he would necessitate to last. Since the slave had no money, he would utilize recognition from the merchandiser. The merchandiser would boost up the monetary values and by the clip of following twelvemonth when the slave had to pay back the merchandiser he would either travel broke or would be in debt. I believe that the thought of land reform that would do land available to the slaves if their proprietors fled was a good thought. Andrew Jackson was incorrect for giving back the land to the proprietors because it would of learn them an even greater lesson by giving the white plantation proprietors the idea of holding their land given to the slaves that worked on the land have holding the slaves own it as if it was theirs from the beginning.