A Poison Tree Essay Research Paper

A Poison Tree Essay, Research Paper

& # 8220 ; Anger, & # 8221 ; & # 8220 ; wrath, & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; fright & # 8221 ; are really outstanding in the short sixteen-line piece and engulf you from the start. In this paper, there will be an statement that & # 8220 ; A Poison Tree & # 8221 ; is a symbol for the deficiency of restraint and self-denial in adult male. An statement that Blake, if mentioning to himself in the verse form, uses himself as the snake from the Garden of Eden, except as a snake with a witting.

The first stanza shows In taking a verse form from the English Romanticism epoch, I found one that peculiarly stands among others. A verse form that had some deepness, in that I couldn t understand and experience what the verse form was showing at first glimpse. It is a verse form that had a sense of enigma around it. These features are exceptionally apparent in William Blake s verse form & # 8220 ; A Poison tree. & # 8221 ; William Blake was a British poet and painter born in 1757 to a male parent who was hosier. & # 8220 ; Anger, & # 8221 ; & # 8220 ; wrath, & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; fright & # 8221 ; are really outstanding in the short sixteen-line piece and engulf you from the start. In this paper, there will be an statement that & # 8220 ; A Poison Tree & # 8221 ; is a symbol for the deficiency of restraint and self-denial in adult male. An statement that Blake, if mentioning to himself in the verse form, uses himself as the snake from the Garden of Eden, except as a snake with a witting. The first stanza juxtaposes the thought of friend and enemy in a instead elegant manner. The stanza reads, & # 8220 ; I was angry with my friend/ I told my wrath, my wrath did end./ I was angry with my foe/ I told it non, my wrath did turn & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.38 ) . The contrast in actions associating to a & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; in differentiation to a & # 8220 ; enemy, & # 8221 ; is the relevant subject in this stanza. The different ways in which Blake, if he so is mentioning to himself in this verse form, trades with choler towards a & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; and conversely towards an antagonist is striking. When angry with a friend, Blake is able to command his choler and envelop it in a finite sense. On the other manus, Blake shows small forgiveness for an enemy. Blake s abrasiveness and deficiency of penitence toward the adult male in this verse form can non be to the full realized until looking at the concluding two stanzas every bit good as the illustration. The 2nd stanza reads, & # 8220 ; And I waterd it in frights, / Night & A ; forenoon with my cryings: / And I sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . This stanza is wholly centered on the tree that the & # 8220 ; foe & # 8221 ; would subsequently steal an apple from. Blake s is evidently doing a symbol and fable in mention to the Bible and the Garden of Eden. Now the inquiry is whether the Blake s tree symbolizes, from the Bible, the tree of good and evil or the tree of life. Does it even matter which tree was being symbolized here? These are inquiries that should be answered to to the full understand the verse form. Some cognition of the Bible is in order to carry through this. One tree from the Garden of Eden is the tree of good and evil ; this is the tree from which Eve took the fruit ( nevertheless non an apple ) and shared it with Adam. Satan, in the signifier of a snake, tempted Eve by stating her that she would be wise and cognize the difference between good and evil if she ate the fruit off the tree. The 2nd tree is the tree of life which besides contains fruit, that if eaten will convey the feeder ageless life. Because Adam and Eve Ate from the tree of good and evil, they were non allowed to eat from the tree of life and hence banished from Eden. From the 2nd stanza entirely, it is impossible to do a mention towards what tree is being referred to. Interesting is that Blake provinces, & # 8220 ; And I waterd it in frights & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . Blake s & # 8220 ; wrath & # 8221 ; was accompanied with & # 8220 ; fear. & # 8221 ; Fear from what? Could it be the fright from Blake s enemy? Or could it be fear that fruit from the tree could be stolen? One can presume that Blake s fear roots for his actions in lines 6-9 ; & # 8220 ; Night & A ; forenoon with my cryings: / And I sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . Blake was fearful of his actions that would finally bring forth a & # 8220 ; toxicant tree & # 8221 ; that could lure and bring down hurting on his enemy. Blake is demoing some marks of a witting such as making something that was alluring and yet besides lifelessly. However, the one instrumental difference from the Bible is that the snake ne’er had a witting. Blake references that he, mentioning to the tree, & # 8220 ; sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . It is Blake s & # 8220 ; fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; that allow him to foster this toxicant tree and return the fraudulence that Blake has received to his & # 8220 ; foe. & # 8221 ; It is of import to observe that Blake s enemy didn T become so by stealing an apple from his tree. Blake was already angry with this adult male. Evidence of this can be seen in 3rd stanza. The 3rd stanza reads, & # 8220 ; And it grew both twenty-four hours and night./ Till it bore an apple bright./ And my foe beheld it shine./ And he knew that it was mine & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg. 39 ) . Blake s enemy & # 8220 ; beheld it shine. & # 8221 ; If his enemy saw the apple so one must reason that this adult male was Blake s antagonist before he watered and nurtured the tree. Knowing that is important because it helps to understand the first stanza to the full. For illustration, if Blake were mad at his enemy merely because he stole from his tree, so the first stanza would function as drumhead to the approaching three stanzas. The first stanza is non a drumhead but an debut to the remainder of the narrative in the verse form. With the 3rd stanza understood, one can now travel back to my original inquiry of the tree. Is the tree a representation of the tree of good and evil, the tree of life, or neither? Since both trees in the Garden of Eden contained fruit as Blake s does, that merely adds to the singular similarity in imagination that Blake is utilizing in mention to the Garden of Eden. There is still non adequate grounds to do a convincing instance either manner. An instrumental line in the 3rd stanza is in line 13, which states, & # 8220 ; And my foe beheld it shine & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . Evidence is given to the fact that the apple is alluring. By the apply reflecting, imagination of a really beguiling and breathtaking fruit is constructed. Blake does this to make even more reinforcement to the fact that he is playing the portion of the snake. Blake was the 1 who created this captivating apple and his intent was to lure his challenger to his ruin. The flood tide of the verse form comes in the 4th and last stanza. It reads, & # 8220 ; And into my garden stole./ When the dark had veild the pole./ In the forenoon sword lily I see./ My enemy outstretched beneath the tree & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg. 39 ) . The dark covered or veiled Blake s garden and allowed the enemy to steal the tree. One might even reason, although complete grounds of this is non present, that the dark straight refers to Blake s function as the snake or Satan. In the literary universe, such as Dante s Inferno, and more conventional agencies such as the Bible, it is understood that God is everything. This includes visible radiation and wantonnesss everything else. Since evil things are what God is non, the darkness of the dark would be a logical comrade for the snake to possess as a tool for alluring the enemy toward the tree. The last two lines of the verse form gaining control the full temper of the verse form as a whole. Blake affirms, & # 8220 ; In the forenoon sword lily I see./ My foe outstretchd beneath the tree & # 8221 ; ( Damrosch 125 ) Blake s adversary Ate the apple and is now lying & # 8220 ; beneath the tree. & # 8221 ; Knowing that the adult male whom ate the apple is dead, resolves the difference of the tree that he ate from. As mentioned earlier, the tree of life, if eaten from, will engender ageless life. It is unafraid to state that Blake s tree was non an fable for the tree of life. The tree of good and evil permits the cognition of distinguishing good from evil. Evidence for Blake s mention to this tree is non incontestable, nevertheless Blake was finally mentioning to the tree of good and evil because, as in the first stanza, the verse form revolves about good and evil, & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; foe. & # 8221 ; The job is that decease does non straight come from eating off the tree of good and evil. However, Blake intentionally left room for guess on how the adult male finally ended up & # 8220 ; outstrecthd beneath the tree. & # 8221 ; Adam and Eve were finally banished from the Garden of Eden for eating from the tree of good and evil and finally denied ageless life. In a sense, the tree was responsible for their ruin merely as Blake s tree could be seen as the ground for his enemy s death. Not merely did the apple lead to the adult male s downfall, but besides the deficiency of restraint that is a symbol of the abandonment of self-denial in all adult male. The illustration that guides the verse form is such a manner that one can see it one of Blake s greatest plants. The graphics centres around a adult male, on his dorsum, lying lifeless under the bare subdivisions of a leafless tree. The sky is bluish but one can do out that with such nice environment, it gives grounds to the fact that conditions are such that a tree should boom ; nevertheless the tree that the adult male lies under is dead. Blake represents his ain toxicant tree and contrasting that to the existent universe. Another dramatic facet of the illustration is the manner the adult male is place beneath the tree. His weaponries outstretched. What is uneven is, in mention to the verse form, the adult male being the 1 who lacked restraint and ate the apple is really a symbol for the adult male who died for wickedness s such as the 1 he merely committed Christ. Blake may hold been doing a point on the ability to take for granted the forfeit Christ made in deceasing for our wickednesss. Blake was an devouring reader of the Bible, and mentions like that were really characteristic of the clip. A Poison Tree & # 8221 ; is the ideal verse form for Blake s Songs of Experience. Blake realizes that artlessness is non merely strictly good or experience strictly evil. Although Blake uses & # 8220 ; A Poison Tree & # 8221 ; to indicate out the deficiency of self-denial and restraint in adult male, he besides shows the tempter, the snake, with a witting, which differs from the Bible greatly. Overall, I believe that the verse form is one of Blake s best plants from Songs of Experience. I feel that Blake s usage of imagination, fable, symbolism and illustration truly put this poem apart from others.

In taking a verse form from the English Romanticism epoch, I found one that peculiarly stands among others. A verse form that had some deepness, in that I couldn t understand and experience what the verse form was showing at first glimpse. It is a verse form that had a sense of enigma around it. These features are exceptionally apparent in William Blake s verse form & # 8220 ; A Poison tree. & # 8221 ; William Blake was a British poet and painter born in 1757 to a male parent who was hosier. & # 8220 ; Anger, & # 8221 ; & # 8220 ; wrath, & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; fright & # 8221 ; are really outstanding in the short sixteen-line piece and engulf you from the start. In this paper, there will be an statement that & # 8220 ; A Poison Tree & # 8221 ; is a symbol for the deficiency of restraint and self-denial in adult male. An statement that Blake, if mentioning to himself in the verse form, uses himself as the snake from the Garden of Eden, except as a snake with a witting. The first stanza juxtaposes the thought of friend and enemy in a instead elegant manner. The stanza reads, & # 8220 ; I was angry with my friend/ I told my wrath, my wrath did end./ I was angry with my foe/ I told it non, my wrath did turn & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.38 ) . The contrast in actions associating to a & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; in differentiation to a & # 8220 ; enemy, & # 8221 ; is the relevant subject in this stanza. The different ways in which Blake, if he so is mentioning to himself in this verse form, trades with choler towards a & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; and conversely towards an antagonist is striking. When angry with a friend, Blake is able to command his choler and envelop it in a finite sense. On the other manus, Blake shows small forgiveness for an enemy. Blake s abrasiveness and deficiency of penitence toward the adult male in this verse form can non be to the full realized until looking at the concluding two stanzas every bit good as the illustration. The 2nd stanza reads, & # 8220 ; And I waterd it in frights, / Night & A ; forenoon with my cryings: / And I sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . This stanza is wholly centered on the tree that the & # 8220 ; foe & # 8221 ; would subsequently steal an apple from. Blake s is evidently doing a symbol and fable in mention to the Bible and the Garden of Eden. Now the inquiry is whether the Blake s tree symbolizes, from the Bible, the tree of good and evil or the tree of life. Does it even matter which tree was being symbolized here? These are inquiries that should be answered to to the full understand the verse form. Some cognition of the Bible is in order to carry through this. One tree from the Garden of Eden is the tree of good and evil ; this is the tree from which Eve took the fruit ( nevertheless non an apple ) and shared it with Adam. Satan, in the signifier of a snake, tempted Eve by stating her that she would be wise and cognize the difference between good and evil if she ate the fruit off the tree. The 2nd tree is the tree of life which besides contains fruit, that if eaten will convey the feeder ageless life. Because Adam and Eve Ate from the tree of good and evil, they were non allowed to eat from the tree of life and hence banished from Eden. From the 2nd stanza entirely, it is impossible to do a mention towards what tree is being referred to. Interesting is that Blake provinces, & # 8220 ; And I waterd it in frights & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . Blake s & # 8220 ; wrath & # 8221 ; was accompanied with & # 8220 ; fear. & # 8221 ; Fear from what? Could it be the fright from Blake s enemy? Or could it be fear that fruit from the tree could be stolen? One can presume that Blake s fear roots for his actions in lines 6-9 ; & # 8220 ; Night & A ; forenoon with my cryings: / And I sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . Blake was fearful of his actions that would finally bring forth a & # 8220 ; toxicant tree & # 8221 ; that could lure and bring down hurting on his enemy. Blake is demoing some marks of a witting such as making something that was alluring and yet besides lifelessly. However, the one instrumental difference from the Bible is that the snake ne’er had a witting. Blake references that he, mentioning to the tree, & # 8220 ; sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . It is Blake s & # 8220 ; fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; that allow him to foster

this toxicant tree and return the fraudulence that Blake has received to his “foe.” It is of import to observe that Blake s enemy didn T become so by stealing an apple from his tree. Blake was already angry with this adult male. Evidence of this can be seen in 3rd stanza. The 3rd stanza reads, “And it grew both twenty-four hours and night./ Till it bore an apple bright./ And my foe beheld it shine./ And he knew that it was mine” ( Songs of Experience Pg. 39 ) . Blake s enemy “beheld it shine.” If his enemy saw the apple so one must reason that this adult male was Blake s antagonist before he watered and nurtured the tree. Knowing that is important because it helps to understand the first stanza to the full. For illustration, if Blake were mad at his enemy merely because he stole from his tree, so the first stanza would function as drumhead to the approaching three stanzas. The first stanza is non a drumhead but an debut to the remainder of the narrative in the verse form. With the 3rd stanza understood, one can now travel back to my original inquiry of the tree. Is the tree a representation of the tree of good and evil, the tree of life, or neither? Since both trees in the Garden of Eden contained fruit as Blake s does, that merely adds to the singular similarity in imagination that Blake is utilizing in mention to the Garden of Eden. There is still non adequate grounds to do a convincing instance either manner. An instrumental line in the 3rd stanza is in line 13, which states, “And my foe beheld it shine” ( Songs of Experience Pg.39 ) . Evidence is given to the fact that the apple is alluring. By the apply reflecting, imagination of a really beguiling and breathtaking fruit is constructed. Blake does this to make even more reinforcement to the fact that he is playing the portion of the snake. Blake was the 1 who created this captivating apple and his intent was to lure his challenger to his ruin. The flood tide of the verse form comes in the 4th and last stanza. It reads, “And into my garden stole./ When the dark had veild the pole./ In the forenoon sword lily I see./ My enemy outstretched beneath the tree” ( Songs of Experience Pg. 39 ) . The dark covered or veiled Blake s garden and allowed the enemy to steal the tree. One might even reason, although complete grounds of this is non present, that the dark straight refers to Blake s function as the snake or Satan. In the literary universe, such as Dante s Inferno, and more conventional agencies such as the Bible, it is understood that God is everything. This includes visible radiation and wantonnesss everything else. Since evil things are what God is non, the darkness of the dark would be a logical comrade for the snake to possess as a tool for alluring the enemy toward the tree. The last two lines of the verse form gaining control the full temper of the verse form as a whole. Blake affirms, “In the forenoon sword lily I see./ My foe outstretchd beneath the tree” ( Damrosch 125 ) Blake s adversary Ate the apple and is now lying “beneath the tree.” Knowing that the adult male whom ate the apple is dead, resolves the difference of the tree that he ate from. As mentioned earlier, the tree of life, if eaten from, will engender ageless life. It is unafraid to state that Blake s tree was non an fable for the tree of life. The tree of good and evil permits the cognition of distinguishing good from evil. Evidence for Blake s mention to this tree is non incontestable, nevertheless Blake was finally mentioning to the tree of good and evil because, as in the first stanza, the verse form revolves about good and evil, “friend” and “foe.” The job is that decease does non straight come from eating off the tree of good and evil. However, Blake intentionally left room for guess on how the adult male finally ended up “outstrecthd beneath the tree.” Adam and Eve were finally banished from the Garden of Eden for eating from the tree of good and evil and finally denied ageless life. In a sense, the tree was responsible for their ruin merely as Blake s tree could be seen as the ground for his enemy s death. Not merely did the apple lead to the adult male s downfall, but besides the deficiency of restraint that is a symbol of the abandonment of self-denial in all adult male. The illustration that guides the verse form is such a manner that one can see it one of Blake s greatest plants. The graphics centres around a adult male, on his dorsum, lying lifeless under the bare subdivisions of a leafless tree. The sky is bluish but one can do out that with such nice environment, it gives grounds to the fact that conditions are such that a tree should boom ; nevertheless the tree that the adult male lies under is dead. Blake represents his ain toxicant tree and contrasting that to the existent universe. Another dramatic facet of the illustration is the manner the adult male is place beneath the tree. His weaponries outstretched. What is uneven is, in mention to the verse form, the adult male being the 1 who lacked restraint and ate the apple is really a symbol for the adult male who died for wickedness s such as the 1 he merely committed Christ. Blake may hold been doing a point on the ability to take for granted the forfeit Christ made in deceasing for our wickednesss. Blake was an devouring reader of the Bible, and mentions like that were really characteristic of the clip. A Poison Tree” is the ideal verse form for Blake s Songs of Experience. Blake realizes that artlessness is non merely strictly good or experience strictly evil. Although Blake uses “A Poison Tree” to indicate out the deficiency of self-denial and restraint in adult male, he besides shows the tempter, the snake, with a witting, which differs from the Bible greatly. Overall, I believe that the verse form is one of Blake s best plants from Songs of Experience. I feel that Blake s usage of imagination, fable, symbolism and illustration truly put this poem apart from others.

the thought of friend and enemy in a instead elegant manner. The stanza reads, & # 8220 ; I was angry with my friend/ I told my wrath, my wrath did end./ I was angry with my foe/ I told it non, my wrath did turn & # 8221 ; . The contrast in actions associating to a & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; in differentiation to a & # 8220 ; enemy, & # 8221 ; is the relevant subject in this stanza. The different ways in which Blake, if he so is mentioning to himself in this verse form, trades with choler towards a & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; and conversely towards an antagonist is striking. When angry with a friend, Blake is able to command his choler and envelop it in a finite sense. On the other manus, Blake shows small forgiveness for an enemy. Blake s abrasiveness and deficiency of penitence toward the adult male in this verse form can non be to the full realized until looking at the concluding two stanzas every bit good as the illustration.

The 2nd stanza reads, & # 8220 ; And I waterd it in frights, / Night & A ; forenoon with my cryings: / And I sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; . This stanza is wholly centered on the tree that the & # 8220 ; foe & # 8221 ; would subsequently steal an apple from. Blake s is evidently doing a symbol and fable in mention to the Bible and the Garden of Eden. Now the inquiry is whether the Blake s tree symbolizes, from the Bible, the tree of good and evil or the tree of life. Does it even matter which tree was being symbolized here? These are inquiries that should be answered to to the full understand the verse form. Some cognition of the Bible is in order to carry through this. One tree from the Garden of Eden is the tree of good and evil ; this is the tree from which Eve took the fruit ( nevertheless non an apple ) and shared it with Adam. Satan, in the signifier of a snake, tempted Eve by stating her that she would be wise and cognize the difference between good and evil if she ate the fruit off the tree. The 2nd tree is the tree of life which besides contains fruit, that if eaten will convey the feeder ageless life. Because Adam and Eve Ate from the tree of good and evil, they were non allowed to eat from the tree of life and hence banished from Eden. From the 2nd stanza entirely, it is impossible to do a mention towards what tree is being referred to. Interesting is that Blake provinces, & # 8220 ; And I waterd it in frights & # 8221 ; . Blake s & # 8220 ; wrath & # 8221 ; was accompanied with & # 8220 ; fear. & # 8221 ; Fear from what? Could it be the fright from Blake s enemy? Or could it be fear that fruit from the tree could be stolen? One can presume that Blake s fear roots for his actions in lines 6-9 ; & # 8220 ; Night & A ; forenoon with my cryings: / And I sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; Blake was fearful of his actions that would finally bring forth a & # 8220 ; toxicant tree & # 8221 ; that could lure and bring down hurting on his enemy. Blake is demoing some marks of a witting such as making something that was alluring and yet besides lifelessly. However, the one instrumental difference from the Bible is that the snake ne’er had a witting. Blake references that he, mentioning to the tree, & # 8220 ; sunned it with smiles./ And with soft fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; . It is Blake s & # 8220 ; fallacious trickeries & # 8221 ; that allow him to foster this toxicant tree and return the fraudulence that Blake has received to his & # 8220 ; foe. & # 8221 ; It is of import to observe that Blake s enemy didn T become so by stealing an apple from his tree. Blake was already angry with this adult male. Evidence of this can be seen in 3rd stanza.

The 3rd stanza reads, & # 8220 ; And it grew both twenty-four hours and night./ Till it bore an apple bright./ And my foe beheld it shine./ And he knew that it was mine & # 8221 ; .Blake s enemy & # 8220 ; beheld it shine. & # 8221 ; If his enemy saw the apple so one must reason that this adult male was Blake s antagonist before he watered and nurtured the tree. Knowing that is important because it helps to understand the first stanza to the full. For illustration, if Blake were mad at his enemy merely because he stole from his tree, so the first stanza would function as drumhead to the approaching three stanzas. The first stanza is non a drumhead but an debut to the remainder of the narrative in the verse form. With the 3rd stanza understood, one can now travel back to my original inquiry of the tree. Is the tree a representation of the tree of good and evil, the tree of life, or neither? Since both trees in the Garden of Eden contained fruit as Blake s does, that merely adds to the singular similarity in imagination that Blake is utilizing in mention to the Garden of Eden. There is still non adequate grounds to do a convincing instance either manner. An instrumental line in the 3rd stanza is in line 13, which states, & # 8220 ; And my foe beheld it shine & # 8221 ; . Evidence is given to the fact that the apple is alluring. By the apply reflecting, imagination of a really beguiling and breathtaking fruit is constructed. Blake does this to make even more reinforcement to the fact that he is playing the portion of the snake. Blake was the 1 who created this captivating apple and his intent was to lure his challenger to his ruin.

The flood tide of the verse form comes in the 4th and last stanza. It reads, & # 8220 ; And into my garden stole./ When the dark had veild the pole./ In the forenoon sword lily I see./ My enemy outstretched beneath the tree & # 8221 ; . The dark covered or veiled Blake s garden and allowed the enemy to steal the tree. One might even reason, although complete grounds of this is non present, that the dark straight refers to Blake s function as the snake or Satan. In the literary universe, such as Dante s Inferno, and more conventional agencies such as the Bible, it is understood that God is everything. This includes visible radiation and wantonnesss everything else. Since evil things are what God is non, the darkness of the dark would be a logical comrade for the snake to possess as a tool for alluring the enemy toward the tree. The last two lines of the verse form gaining control the full temper of the verse form as a whole. Blake affirms, & # 8220 ; In the forenoon sword lily I see./ My foe outstretchd beneath the tree & # 8221 ; ( Damrosch 125 ) Blake s adversary Ate the apple and is now lying & # 8220 ; beneath the tree. & # 8221 ; Knowing that the adult male whom ate the apple is dead, resolves the difference of the tree that he ate from. As mentioned earlier, the tree of life, if eaten from, will engender ageless life. It is unafraid to state that Blake s tree was non an fable for the tree of life. The tree of good and evil permits the cognition of distinguishing good from evil. Evidence for Blake s mention to this tree is non incontestable, nevertheless Blake was finally mentioning to the tree of good and evil because, as in the first stanza, the verse form revolves about good and evil, & # 8220 ; friend & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; foe. & # 8221 ; The job is that decease does non straight come from eating off the tree of good and evil. However, Blake intentionally left room for guess on how the adult male finally ended up & # 8220 ; outstrecthd beneath the tree. & # 8221 ; Adam and Eve were finally banished from the Garden of Eden for eating from the tree of good and evil and finally denied ageless life. In a sense, the tree was responsible for their ruin merely as Blake s tree could be seen as the ground for his enemy s death. Not merely did the apple lead to the adult male s downfall, but besides the deficiency of restraint that is a symbol of the abandonment of self-denial in all adult male. The illustration that guides the verse form is such a manner that one can see it one of Blake s greatest plants. The graphics centres around a adult male, on his dorsum, lying lifeless under the bare subdivisions of a leafless tree. The sky is bluish but one can do out that with such nice environment, it gives grounds to the fact that conditions are such that a tree should boom ; nevertheless the tree that the adult male lies under is dead. Blake represents his ain toxicant tree and contrasting that to the existent universe. Another dramatic facet of the illustration is the manner the adult male is place beneath the tree. His weaponries outstretched. What is uneven is, in mention to the verse form, the adult male being the 1 who lacked restraint and ate the apple is really a symbol for the adult male who died for wickedness s such as the 1 he merely committed Christ. Blake may hold been doing a point on the ability to take for granted the forfeit Christ made in deceasing for our wickednesss. Blake was an devouring reader of the Bible, and mentions like that were really characteristic of the clip. Although Blake uses & # 8220 ; A Poison Tree & # 8221 ; to indicate out the deficiency of self-denial and restraint in adult male, he besides shows the tempter, the snake, with a witting, which differs from the Bible greatly.

Overall, I believe that the verse form is one of Blake s best plants from Songs of Experience. I feel that Blake s usage of imagination, fable, symbolism and illustration truly put this poem apart from others.