Argument Mapping Essay Sample

1. Make an statement map based on the influence diagram presented in Case 1. 3 and complete all the standards provided in the exercising. get downing with this claim: “The U. S. should return to the 55- miles per hour velocity bound in order to conserve fuel and salvage lives. ” Include in the map as many warrants. backups. expostulations. and rebuttals as possible.

“The U. S. should return to the 55- miles per hour velocity bound in order to conserve fuel and salvage lives. ” Supports
Cars are most fuel efficient when driven between 30 miles per hour and 60 miles per hour. Above 65 miles per hour. milage drops aggressively. This isn’t projectile scientific discipline. If drivers are forced to decelerate down. we would all utilize less gasolene. |

Surveies show that drivers have been altering their wonts in order to cut fuel costs. Above 65 miles per hour. milage drops aggressively. This isn’t projectile scientific discipline. If drivers are forced to decelerate down. we would all utilize less gasolene. |

Experts say cut downing main road velocities from 70 miles per hour to 60 miles per hour would cut down gasolene ingestion between 2 % and 3 % . That could interpret into a monetary value decrease of every bit much as 10 % . At today’s monetary value. about 38 cents a gallon.

The fact that this simple solution. which merely requires new marks. non new engineerings.

Strong Supports
Drivers have long known that decelerating down on the main road means acquiring more stat mis to the gallon.

Steve from Idaho writes:
It is about clip we Americans quit whining and get down confronting the world that our life styles are traveling to. hold to. alteration! We pride ourselves on holding 3. 2 autos in our garage and experience it’s our right to drive our large 8-cylinder SUVs. Lowering the velocity bound to 55 stat mis an hr. times 1000000s of autos. will salvage gas. cut down waste and may even convey the monetary value of gas down a small. |

The congresswoman from Virginia province Warner. who was the Navy secretary during the early 1970s. said that the 55-mph national velocity bound was the “centerpiece” of America’s attempts to “work its manner through” the ’70s energy crisis. Subsequent surveies showed that the jurisprudence lessened the nation’s main road fuel ingestion by 2 per centum and saved up to 4. 000 lives a twelvemonth by cut downing accidents.

Americans saved 167. 000 barrels of crude oil a twenty-four hours when the 55-mph velocity bound was in consequence.

Opposes
Most autos that are built today are designed to hold their best fuel efficiency at 65 miles per hour.

They already tried to cut down velocity bound in Mississippi and all it did was bind up traffic and generate more speeding tickets. | Assume that the original qualifier was surely ; bespeak whether the qualifier alterations as we move from a simple. inactive. uncontested statement to a complex. dynamic and contested statement. Consumer Reports tested the consequence of higher velocities on gas milage. David Champion. manager of car testing. found that hiking the main road velocity of a 2006 Toyota Camry cut gasoline milage dramatically: •55 m. p. h. – 40. 3 stat mis per gallon

•65 m. p. h. – 34. 9 stat mis per gallon
•75 m. p. h. – 29. 8 stat mis per gallon
On a conjectural 1. 900-mile unit of ammunition trip from New York City to Disney World in Florida. the Camry would utilize 47 gallons of gas at 55 m. p. h. . But at 75 m. p. h. . it would fire about 64 gallons – a $ 70 difference. If everyone could cut down their drive by merely 10 per centum. the nest eggs would number about 1 million barrels of gasolene every twenty-four hours. In my sentiment. the Congress should go on to let the provinces to put their ain velocity bounds. A bound of 55 miles per hour may be sensible in a engorged province like New Jersey but impractical and unenforceable in a broad northwesterly province like Montana. The best manner to cut down accidents and human deaths on roads is to ordain tough drunk-driving Torahs. addition punishments for foolhardy drive ( sometimes the most unsafe drivers are the slowest 1s ) . and develop a toll system to cut down congestion. Decision:

Washington – Three decennaries ago. during an earlier energy crisis. Ronald Reagan strode into an Atlanta hotel for a political meeting. As he approached the auditorium. person asked: “Governor Reagan. as a conservative. don’t you think the 55 miles-per-hour velocity bound imposed by the authorities to salvage gas is a misdemeanor of our freedom? ” In his good-humored mode. Reagan chuckled softly and replied something like this: “Well. that could be. But. speech production merely personally. I think it’s non a bad thing if we all slow down merely a spot and bask the scenery a little more. ” It’s up to us. Save gas. and win this battle.

. Write an analysis of 1-2 pages that uses critical thought to measure the overall plausibleness of the claim: “The struggle in Bosnia is somebody else’s problem. The U. S. should non step in militarily. ” For over four old ages following the dissolution of Yugoslavia and the oncoming of war. first in Croatia and so in Bosnia. the United States refused to take the lead in seeking to stop the force and struggle. While many have written articulately and passionately to explicate Washington’s—and the West’s—failure to halt the cultural cleaning. the concentration cantonments. and the slaughters of 100s of 1000s of civilians. few have examined why. in the summer of 1995. the United States eventually did take on a leading function to stop the war in Bosnia. By the terminal of July the United States and its Alliess confronted a state of affairs that required conjunct action. The scheme of puddling through that had characterized U. S. policy since the beginning of the struggle clearly was no longer feasible. The president made clear to his senior advisors that he wanted to acquire out of the box in which U. S. policy found itself.

This box had been created by an impracticable diplomatic scheme of offering of all time greater grants to Serb President Slobodan Milosevic merely to acquire the Bosnian Serbs to the tabular array ; by the long-standing refusal to set U. S. troops on the land ; by allied opposition to utilizing force every bit long as their military personnels could be taken surety ; by a U. N. bid that insisted on “traditional peacekeeping principles” even though a war was ramping ; and by a U. S. Congress set on taking the moral high land by one-sidedly raising the weaponries embargo on the Bosnian authorities without. nevertheless. taking duty for the effects of making so. The US as exclusive world power must take the attempt to right intercession. First. the US must develop a National Security Strategy and back uping National Military Strategy that are based upon clearly defined involvements. Definition of involvements is tantamount to a declaration of chase of involvements and effects credibleness. capableness. and strategic way.

These involvements must be realistic. limited to those that are accomplishable and sustainable within US capablenesss and supported by the intangibles of national will and civilization. Interests require declaration to avoid contradiction and timeserving reading. These involvements should be limited to survival. stableness. and prosperity. Human-centered concerns should be recognized as values but non involvements. Second. the US must avoid the morass of the deserter legitimization of self-government. People around the universe ever have different sentiments about everything that the United States does. One of the on-going arguments right now that people are discoursing is whether or non the United States should step in in the internal struggles of the Balkans. There are several premises and inquiries that should be explored. The United States should non step in in the Balkans because: This country has ever had a history of jobs and has ever worked it out before. The United States is being affected negatively. It is great that the U. S. wants to assist but we are non able to assist all the manner. If the emotion and sentiments are taken away it comes down to whether or non it is lawful or justified under the UN charter for the U. S. to step in. I believe that the United States should non step in so much in the internal struggles of the Balkans. Complete an statement map to exemplify your analysis.

Supports
This country has ever had a history of jobs and has ever worked it out before| The jurisprudence states that it is non lawful to step in if the province has non asked you to. | The Balkans does non propose the demand for human intervention| How does the United States program to occupy the Bosnia. and “make” everyone get along. except by killing foreign politicians? There is no other manner beside the menace of force. which the US must be willing to transport out if the menace is to be effectual. If there is no killing to be done. why send the armed forces? | We have no clear. definable mission in the Bosnia such that we can make up one’s mind when we have done our occupation and when it is clip to travel place. | Strong Support

As a affair of practical wisdom. we can non anticipate the federal authorities to handle American citizens like free individuals when it treats the citizens of other states like Bosnia severely by intervene military without inquiring.

Mentions:

Congressional Testimony. ( 2008. July ) . HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAMS: JACQUELINE S. GILLAN Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary. bigchalk. com Moore. Stephen ( 2005. April 25 ) . Back to 55? . National Review. ( 7 ) . 6. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary. bigchalk. com Dunn. W. N. ( 2012 ) . Public policy analysis ( 5th ed. ) . Upper Saddle River. New jersey: Pearson Education. Inc.

Regulative Intelligence Data. ( 1999. November ) . SLOW DOWN WHEN GOING HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary. bigchalk. com State Department Documents / FIND. ( 2007. March ) . Deciding Kosovo Status Offers Region Path to Europe. U. S. Says Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary. bigchalk. com

Edward P. Joseph ( 2005. January 01 ) . Back to the Balkans. Foreign Affairs. 111. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary. bigchalk. com ( 2009 ) . false belief. formal and informal. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. V 3. 0. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //elibrary. bigchalk. com