Aristotle: the Nicomachean Ethics Essay Sample
In these two books. Aristotle talked about friendly relationship. He started by saying what the three different types of friendly relationship are. The first type is when it is based on public-service corporation. This type of friendly relationship is all about acquiring a benefit from person else. and it will alter harmonizing to fortunes. If a individual doesn’t get benefits from the other any longer. the friendly relationship will discontinue to be present. Benefits don’t have to be the lone land for friendly relationship of this type. but there are decidedly clear benefits involved. One illustration of this type of friendship Aristotle gave was friendships with aliens. The 2nd type of friendly relationship is based on pleasance. In this type. you find the other individual entertaining. and it is more about the experience of being near the individual than anything else. This type is common between immature people because immature people’s lives are regulated by feelings. These friendly relationships come and go frequently. and the friend doesn’t bring much to the friendly relationship. The last type of friendly relationship is based on goodness.
This is when two “good” people are friends for the interest of each other. Both people in this friendly relationship want for the good of the other. and this type of relationship is most lasting. Aristotle considered this type to be the perfect friendly relationship. He didn’t attention for the first two types because they are both ephemeral. and they are circumstantial ( Pgs. 203-208 ) . Following. Aristotle talked about friendly relationships that involved high quality. One illustration of this that was explained was the relationship between a parent and a kid. Since the parent is more morally mature than the kid. it is an unequal relationship. The more virtuous individual is supposed to further the virtuousness in the other individual. and the kid. or less virtuous individual. needs to love that individual. and offer them esteem and honour in a much higher measure in order to be out the relationship between the two ( Pgs. 211-213 ) . Aristotle besides explained the different types of fundamental laws. He believed the most of import country for virtuousnesss is in the larger graduated table of a community. and he thought that friendly relationships and political relations could collaborate because it is a good thing to be friends with the virtuous people who are running your community.
The three types of fundamental laws were monarchy. nobility. and timocracy. Out of these. he thought that monarchy was the best. and timocracy. was the worst option. For monarchy. Aristotle thought it would be best to hold one virtuous individual in control. but if it is corrupt. therefore going a dictatorship. it could turn into the worst possible scenario. In a dictatorship. the individual in control looks out for themselves alternatively of the other people they are supposed to be caring for. An illustration of this could be the slave and maestro illustration. An illustration of a monarchy could be the relationship that is aid between a male parent and a boy. Next. was Aristocracy. An illustration of this is. harmonizing to Aristotle. between hubby and married woman.
The hubby in this type will manus over certain things to the married woman that he deems as appropriate for her to manage herself. The perversion of this type would be oligarchy. Finally. timocracy is when all people who are reasonably equal. every bit far as makings. have equal rights. One illustration of this is between two brothers. and the perversion for this type is democracy ( Pgs. 216-223 ) . Another topic that Aristotle mentioned was if amour propre was justifiable. He stated that you can love yourself to the grade that you are worthy of. so hence. you can love yourself and still be a good friend to others. Besides. he said that if you are a selfish individual. you need to recognize that. and that you shouldn’t hold amour propre. Another exclusion was that if your friends are more virtuous than you are. you should love them more than you love yourself ( Pgs. 243-246 ) .
Aristotle besides touched on the topic of whether measure or quality meant more every bit far as friends go. He said that it isn’t possible for us to hold a batch of friends who we love for their interest and goodness entirely. so we must hold merely a few of this type. So hence. alternatively of holding a big sum of superficial and nonmeaningful relationships. we should hold a smaller sum of deep and intimate relationships. and work on maintaining them strong and healthy. Aristotle besides stated that people truly necessitate friends in the times of hardship and bad luck because friends help us through these tough times and they provide us with comfort. but for many people. it is much more gratifying to hold friends when everything is traveling great. This is because when things are traveling great for you. you are more able to assist others ( Pgs. 249-252 ) .
