Naivete Is Not The Answer Essay Research
Naivete Is Not The Answer Essay, Research Paper
Naivet is Not the Answer Many high schools across the state have been sing whether to administer rubbers in public schools. Some feel that it would non be appropriate because it would advance sexual activity, while others believe that rubber distribution will promote sexually active pupils to utilize protection. Does scattering rubbers in public schools give the feeling to adolescents that it is all right to prosecute in sexual activity, or does it assist to safeguard their lives? This contention has caused some emotional statements that have put aside just appraisal. The people that believe in the distribution of rubbers in public schools maintain that it is an appropriate site because they have an extended array of related educational and wellness attention resources. In contrast, the people against it believe that schools should non supply adolescents with something that aids them in the act of sex, when they shouldn & # 8217 ; t be holding sex at this age in the first topographic point. Both sides agree that abstention is the best message to give adolescents, but we would be na ve to believe that every adolescent would pattern abstinence. The people that approve of rubbers being distributed in public schools believe that most adolescents are excessively abashed to purchase them, and excessively discerning to speak to their parents about sex issues, so they would instead travel unprotected. They besides worry about the serious wellness issues. When used decently, rubbers can assist extinguish of the hazard of gestation and STD transmittal. They believe that rubbers can besides assist decelerate the spreading of the AID & # 8217 ; s virus. With the bulk of high school seniors being sexually active, they feel it is our duty to see that they have the right information and
agencies to protect themselves. Sex instruction is a good thought, nevertheless, some schools lack the decently trained forces required. Adolescents are our hereafter. If we can assist save them from the emotional hurting from unwanted gestations, and/or physical hurting from STD’s, so we need to make everything in our power to protect them.
Those who oppose the distribution of rubbers in public schools feel that we will be recommending prenuptial sex. We will diminish household control and minimise the authorization of the household. If adolescents felt they could travel to their parents, households would non hold to trust on schools to work out their jobs. They believe that passing out rubbers will merely advance promiscuousness, and since no preventive is one 100 per centum effectual, they say there is no such thing as safe sex. We would be directing a message to our adolescents that we do non hold any religion in them to make the right thing, and that they have no self-denial. By administering rubbers, they say we would be interfering with the parents & # 8217 ; right to supervise their kids & # 8217 ; s moral upbringing, and ignoring their spiritual beliefs. They believe people should be working to forestall diseases because rubbers are non the solution. Adolescents today are having two messages. You should abstain from sex, but if you do hold sex, utilize a rubber. It reminds me of another complex message we hear. Don & # 8217 ; t imbibe, but if you do imbibe, wear & # 8217 ; t thrust. This message has saved many lives. Some people may believe that there is no such thing as safe sex, but there is a such thing as safer sex. Without holding the entree to rubbers, adolescents may non utilize them. Therefore the hazards addition and later they play a signifier of Russian roulette. It is true STD & # 8217 ; s can be cured, but no 1 has yet been cured of AIDS.
