Novartis’ Implementation Strategy Essay Sample

With this execution scheme. the new system is installed bit by bit or in one operation but on merely little graduated table. To set merely. the old system will be replaced by the new system in little groups. across similar separate locations. If this is successful. so the pilot is extended until finally replaces the old system wholly. Within each location. the cutover is direct.

* Advantages:
* Easy to command. the pilot can be halt at any clip.
* With this scheme. the pilot can be stopped at any clip during the execution procedure. * Easy to measure because the new and old systems are both running. * This execution attack is besides easy to evaluated because the both systems are running in different locations. * Low hazard. if a small-scale pilot fails so non excessively much has been lost.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

* Easy to develop staff by allowing them larn new accomplishments on the pilot system.
* Disadvantages:
* It can be slow to acquire a pilot to wholly replace the old system.
* A pilot may non demo up jobs that a all-out execution would. This is because a system can work good as a small-scale pilot but has troubles when it is scaled up to a full operating system with more realistic volumes of informations to be processed.


Professionals:
* Easy to command. the pilot can be halt at any clip. * With this scheme. the pilot can be stopped at any clip during the execution procedure. * Easy to measure because the new and old systems are both running. * This execution attack is besides easy to measure because the both systems are running in different locations. •Risk limited to one location at a clip

The hazard associated with this execution scheme is limited to one location at a clip. If the small-scale pilot fails. lost associated with the failure is non that much. •If it goes good in early units. ulterior units will back up If the execution in one unit or location is observed to be successful. wining units might give support for the execution. •Spreads out developing attempt. smaller developing group needed Training attempt is spread out and smaller preparation groups are needed. Staffs can be trained by allowing them learn utilizing the pilot system. •Cons:

* A pilot may non come up jobs that a all-out execution would. This is because a system can work good as a small-scale pilot but has troubles when it is scaled up to a full operating system with more realistic volumes of informations to be processed. * Problems with the new system may non come up in the procedure of put ining the small-scale pilot system but finally show up when the old system is wholly replaced by the new system. This is because the new system might work good as a small-scale pilot but jobs occur when it is expanded as a full operating system since immense volumes of informations are to be processed.

•Delays return and benefits
Since this is a gradual execution. returns and benefits are delayed. •Just because it works in one unit. doesn’t mean it will work in subsequently 1s When the execution attack is successful in one location. it can non be assumes that it will be successful besides in other locations. •If early units are failures. ulterior units will strongly defy There is strong possibility that if there are failures or jobs experienced in the execution procedure in the earlier locations or units. wining units will defy in the execution in their location.

Categories