The Good The Bad And The Existentialist
The Good, The Bad And The Existentialist Essay, Research Paper
The Good, the Bad and the Existentialist
The beliefs of an existential philosopher say that the picks we make throughout our lives all dictate who we are. As viewed by good known existential philosopher philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, ? The ineluctable status of human life is the demand of taking something and accepting the duty for the consequences. ? Existentialism aside, it is widely accepted that we, as worlds, live our ain lives and are free to do determinations for ourselves. Whether or non we will hold to? pay? the effects for our actions is disputed within faiths every bit good as assorted groups of people. Sartre one time said that existential philosophers are the most dedicated optimists. Even though the beliefs of an existential philosopher are both contended and accepted by many, their beliefs wear? t needfully put them apart as the most optimistic.
Religion and doctrine have ne’er been able to successfully unite their thoughts to organize one great truth. Religion believes to hold instructions direct from the oral cavity of God and claim to hold the truth. Separated by denominations yet untied within, they stand strong with the religion that their beliefs will enable them to populate in heaven after this life. Philosophers, like faiths, have their ain beliefs that vary every bit good as portion thoughts with other philosophers. When the beliefs convergence, strong averments come Forth and thoughts clang. ? In his early philosophic work, Being and Nothingness, Sartre conceived worlds as existences who create their ain universe by arising against authorization and by accepting personal duty for their actions, unaided by society, traditional morality, or spiritual religion? ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.connect.net/ron/sartre.html ) . What is so optimistic about that? To what stop do you populate if society, morality and faith do non play a portion of your day-to-day determinations? It might be argued that holding decided to populate for himself and non a? greater good? he is more baronial. Not being pushed by the fright or wages of a God, he lives for his ain dignity and satisfaction. All the piece knowing and accepting the effects.
Some faiths believe that we are judged
for our wickednesss. They teach that as we live we are free to take. What we choose determines what blessings we receive in life every bit good as the hereafter. Other faiths have the instructions and beliefs that no affair what we do in life, every bit long as we accept Christ as our Savior, we are saved to populate in Eden. Having this belief, they are so able to populate how they wish with no effects to forbid them. Sartre said the antonym, ? there is no abstract nature that one is destined to make full. Alternatively, each of us merely is in the universe ; what we will be is so wholly up to us. Being human merely means holding the capacity to make one’s ain kernel in clip. . . But my exercising of this capacity necessarily makes me wholly responsible for the life I choose. Since I could ever hold chosen some other way in life, the one I follow is my ain? ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.philosophypages.com/hy/7e.htm # free ) . Having accepted duty for his actions, he had the possibility of freedom from hurting and agony. By populating his life in this manner he knew that for every action there was a reaction. This enabled him to do determinations consequently.
As seen from my point of view as a Latter-day Saint and partial apprehension of Sartre? s thoughts, there is much to be argued and much to be agreed upon. Sartre said that he chose his way in life and he claims duty. I feel this to be true as it is besides taught within the church. We believe that we are free to take the way we take in life. Yet, non mentioned by Sartre, we besides believe that there is one right way that is true and will take us to ageless life with Heavenly Father. This way is that of Jesus Christ. ? . . . no adult male cometh unto the Father, but by me? ( John 3:17 ) . Like Sartre, we excessively believe that our actions bring effects. The lone difference is that non merely will we experience the effects of our determinations here on Earth but the afterlife every bit good. Certainly Sartre was rather optimistic in his positions. However, his blanketing statement of all existential philosophers being the most optimistic is non right. Sartre? s strong beliefs and instructions should be studied by many but non taken as truths. Harmonizing to the church it is up to each person to happen the truth for himself.
