Was Washington A Good Leader Essay Research

Was Washington A Good Leader Essay, Research Paper

Washington: Good LEader? & # 8221 ; The reply was that there was no 1 else. Washington was recognized as the indispensable adult male. Until the combat was about over, his leading was non once more earnestly challenged. & # 8221 ; During the Revolutionary War, there were some people who doubted Washington s leading accomplishments. George Washington possessed qualities that made him & # 8220 ; indispensable. & # 8221 ; He was a brigadier general of the Virginian forces during the Gallic and Indian War. Forbe described him as & # 8220 ; the ground forces s greatest expert on the wilderness and it s warfare. & # 8221 ; But Rochambeau thought that & # 8220 ; Washington was a fool. & # 8221 ; Washington possessed a new combat manner that he could merely take. This contending manner looked to others as if he did non cognize what he was making. Was Washington truly a good leader, or was he merely an of import portion of a larger program? Why was Washington chosen as the Commander in Chief of the American forces? Washington was chosen as leader because he was immature, he did non desire a wage, he did non blow anything, and, most significantly, & # 8220 ; Washington was the most famed veteran of the Gallic and Indian War. & # 8221 ; Adams recognized Washington s appeal, physical and rational power, and his young person and found him to be the perfect leader. Of all the leaders in the Gallic and Indian War, was Washington the lone leader left? For illustration, his superior officer Braddock could hold been a leader, but he died in an Indian foray that miraculously merely Washington survived. Other leaders during the war now were either old or dead. As Flexner put it, & # 8220 ; Washington was the most famed veteran of the Gallic and Indian War who was still immature plenty to take a new competition. He possessed a appeal combined with apparent physical and nervous power. & # 8221 ; Washington himself knew that he was non the leader everyone thought he was. Flexner said, & # 8220 ; Washington s memories of his activities during the Gallic and Indian War did non promote any assurance in his military gifts, and the undertaking in front seemed to name for mastermind. Washington told some of the Virginians to seek to halt them from doing him the Commander in Chief. But in the terminal, a consentaneous determination made him the Commander in Chief. Now as the Commander in Chief, Washington had to populate up to his outlooks. During many times of the war, Washington had gotten aid from other people. Washington knew from the really get downing that he had to hold aid. He begged for & # 8220 ; aid from four hold oning work forces, each of whom concluded that the new Commander in Chief was to incompetent to acquire on without the aid each patronizingly promised. & # 8221 ; Two of these were soldiers, Horatio Gates and Charles Lee, and the other two were politically of import business communities, Joseph Reed and Thomas Mifflin. During the war, Lee saved Washington and his military personnels many times. At Fort Lee, Reed inserted in one of Washington s letters to Lee that & # 8220 ; the full ground forces felt Lee s presence was their lone hope. & # 8221 ; Lee failed in his efforts to salvage and protect Washington and his military personnels, and so he eventually decided to listen to Washington. But Washington let Lee utilize his ain program and temporarily allow Lee take because he knew that there was nil he could make now. A German Volunteer named Lieutenant General Friedrich Wilhelm Ludolf Gerhard Augustin Baron von Steuben claimed to hold been a high ranking official under Frederick the Great. He was neither a baron nor under Frederick the great ; he was an imposter. But he proved to be an able drillmaster and open minded to the features of the American Troops. Without Steuben, the military personnels would non hold been noticed as a well-trained group of soldiers. The image of the American military personnel was of disorganised husbandmans. Washington had been given recognition for his military personnels of being organized military work forces. To some extent Washington trained them, but Steuben besides trained them. At Philadelphia, the British military personnels had two possible picks. Washington chose the incorrect one the British would take, and so & # 8220 ; he and the Continental Army had been made to look foolish, all the more by contrast by the Northern Army, & # 8221 ; Gates ground forces. He besides planned onslaughts on Boston and New York because he thought that the Gallic Navy was traveling to assist him. Without the Gallic Navy, he would non be able to win. Washington s war scheme was a scheme he had taken from the Indians. When Washington attacked Trenton, he used a type of hit-and-run foray he saw when the Indians attacked in the Gallic and Indian War. His type of tip-and-run foray would be more sophisticated. Washington would assail from three different points so they could non get away, and he would assail on Christmas when they were relaxed. Washington s programs were

ever to complicated says Flexner. But merely one of his three forces got across the river because it was during one of the severest winters. Washington really benefited from the bad conditions. This was non the first clip that the conditions helped him, when he should hold lost. The German Troops, the Hessians, did non believe that anyone would be stupid plenty to travel through the bad conditions. Again, this was non the first clip that Washington did something that no 1 else would hold done because it was so stupid. But his program worked, and the Hessians were caught of guard and they surrendered rapidly. When Washington faced Howe and the British in Boston in the beginning of the war, another storm made Washington win when he should hold lost. His military personnels were untrained with their arms. They were non any lucifer for the British professional slayers. They ran off during the storm and managed to acquire into places which made it strategically bad for the British so the British had to go forth, and Washington claimed yet another triumph.

While in New York, Washington had lost to Howe but he managed to acquire his military personnels off from the British soldiers who were processing in formation. Washington used his wilderness accomplishments to take his work forces in retreat. When Washington was being pursued by the Hessians by the Asunpink and the Delaware River, he made some of his military personnels stay to maintain a fire lit. This made the British think that they had made camped and so the British stopped every bit good. But Washington led his work forces around the Hessians that left & # 8220 ; a force stronger than his ain between his ground forces and all patriot held-territory. & # 8221 ; The British knew of this scheme but even they knew hat what they were making was brainsick. In making so, Washington cut his supply lines and besides blocked his ways of retreat. But he caught the British by surprise and escaped. He developed a new type of war in which his military personnels did non necessitate to transport out so many supplies and they were & # 8220 ; every bit hard to catch as quicksilver. & # 8221 ; During the conflict of Monomuth, Washington s military personnels that were disorganized obeyed with preparedness. Lafayette saw that Washington really led them as a full and proper leader would. When the British tried to run, the Americans advanced like regular military personnels driving the professionals away.Washington besides was a good leader because he did non kill the Tories. He merely sent them to the enemy & # 8217 ; s lines. Everybody loved Washington for the manner he treated them and even the Tories. Washington wrote, & # 8220 ; The bad lucks of was, and the unhappy fortunes often attendant thereon to persons are more to be lamented than avoided ; but it is the responsibility of everyone to relieve them every bit much as possible. & # 8221 ; This paid off because when Howe tried to enroll the Tories and Americans, he could non acquire any because they knew that Washington was good to them while Howe said they were non. He was besides good to his military personnels. The Gallic were surprised that these underaged, Whites, inkinesss, unpaid, ill fed, and about bare work forces were in high liquors. Von Clisen said, & # 8220 ; He is surely admirable as the e leader of his ground forces, in which everyone regards him as his male parent and fiend. & # 8221 ; The British had been treated just by Washington. He let the British take the American Tories and American apostates that went to the British ground forces who would be killed by the Americans. He let the slaves be returned to their proprietors. He let the British Army become Prisoners of War. Washington possessed a new scheme that those who did non understand it, thought of him as a bad leader. Washington became the military and political dictator over Virginia. He entered the war as untrained in sophisticated warfare as his military personnel. But Washington made usage of what he had. He made usage of certain qualities of dedicated soldier who would process and contend in any danger ; would contend with glare separately if non so good in formation ; and be on nonexistent supplies. In the terminal, & # 8220 ; non a individual officer was truly powerful in the ground forces who had non been elevated and trained by the Commander in Chief & # 8211 ; and who was non loyal to him. & # 8221 ; He had more than any political figure served as the state s main executive. He was the leader of the American military personnels and the American People. Was Washington a good leader or bad leader? He was the greatest leader during the radical war. He had endured four British leaders. Washington was a great leader who made usage of all the resources available to him: the soldiers, supplies, people, forces, the schemes. His scheme was the best the universe has seen because it used a new scheme unobserved by the universe. And merely a leader as good and great as him could be capable of taking the Continental Army.

340