Apeuro DBQ on the Poor Essay Sample
The Europeans between the 1450’s and 1700’s held many negative attitudes towards the hapless themselves and the loafers who they believed were a threat to society. Besides during this clip period the Europeans had many responses like in England where they put them in poorhouses or tried to mend them or in others topographic points where they tried to give them alms. During this clip period many Europeans held negative attitudes toward assisting the hapless due to the idle and lazy who go about begging as if they are hapless. Emperor Charles V in a royal decree wrote how randomly giving alms will ensue in idling which is the root of all immoralities ( Document 4 ) . Emperor Charles V has the POV of an emperor who sees that the idle are buming off of his people and are taking away money from those who truly are hapless and can’t discovery occupations. He believes that these idle people left their businesss and have began to implore and sell their girls to frailty alternatively of traveling into honest work because they see how easy it is to implore for money. In France. the town council of Rouen had so much antipathy for the idle that they were be aftering to throw out them from the metropolis due to their injuriousness to the general populace ( Document 5 ) .
The council of Rouen’s POV is that of the leaders of the town that see the idle are aching the honest labourers who really work for their money and don’t go around imploring for money while really holding the ability to make work because the idles are taking advantage of the honest worker’s kindness. Cardinal Richelieu who was a royal councilor is on the side stated as stating that he believed that due to the vagabonds imploring for alms. they are taking staff of life from the meriting hapless and he believes that regulations should be established which would restrict and feed the hapless and do the able bodied do public plants ( Document 8 ) . The of POV of Cardinal Richelieu is that of a high church functionary who sees the idle are taking from the meriting hapless and that the authorities needs to happen a manner to assist the hapless while doing the loafers work on public work protects which would maintain the hapless off the streets. and it would use the goldbricks who are buming off everyone. Many European felt that loafers were buming off them and taking off alms from the hapless who really couldn’t acquire occupations due to illness doing a antipathy of them by the Europeans. Even though many Europeans saw merely the loafers as the jobs. many others had negative attitudes to all hapless people.
Juan Luis Vives who was a Spanish humanist wrote in. On Aid to the Poor. that when a household becomes hapless that the work forces begin to steal. the adult females become cocottes. and their kids turn up and go accustomed to this life style while those with money believe the hapless to non merit their alms ( Document 3 ) . The POV of Vives is that of a humanist who feels they know the deeper significance of all human. and he sees them as distressing animals who when pushed against a wall become hooking animate beings while those with money don’t even seek to better these hapless peoples’ lives by believing that the hapless don’t merit their charity. Jean Maillefer. a affluent Gallic merchandiser. wrote to his kids that the hapless have grown accustom to being hapless and they can non go forth due to them holding no attentions. measures. and frights while they feel great independency ( Document 11 ) . Maillefer’s POV is that the hapless have no concerns and are independent because they have no occupation which comes from him hearing them talk about and besides from how he works long and difficult every twenty-four hours while fearing that he has to pay rent and revenue enhancements and has to care for his household. During a discourse. a Gallic Catholic Priest spoke how giving alms while you are ill or after your decease means nil ( Document 1 ) .
The POV of the priest is that he believes that giving to the hapless isn’t necessary if you are ill or dead because in his eyes. since you are dead it no longer holds any value to anyone else even the hapless. Many Europeans felt that the hapless were a threat to society ad didn’t merit any aid from other people. Even with the many negative positions on the hapless. many Europeans still wanted to assist the hapless who really deserved it. In Dijon. France due to the hapless scream throughout the dark. the town council decided to lease a topographic point for the hapless to remain for future darks ( Document 2 ) . The POV of the town council is that of the leaders who see that they no longer want the hapless rolling the metropolis so they decided to lease someplace for the hapless to kip since they have become an irritation to the general populace. but they still are traveling to handle the hapless every bit good as they can. This Rembrandt study shows an older adult male giving to a hapless household. who looks really soiled. some alms out of the kindness of his bosom ( Document 9 ) . The POV of Rembrandt new wave Rijn is that those that have a good sum should assist those who are in demand of alms which is what is portrayed as a adult male who has a house gives alms to a household who looks like they don’t have one.
Vincent de Paul who was a Catholic priest who founded a spiritual order that helped the hapless said that they need to assist the hapless non merely spiritually. but besides their temporal demands like nutrient and H2O ( Document 10 ) . The POV of Vincent de Paul is that of a priest who cares for all and believes that his spiritual order demands to assist the poor’s secular demands through almsgiving since that is what they need the most and says. to lure the people of his order. that bishops became saints due to their almsgiving which shows what lengths he will good to so that he can beat up his followings to assist the hapless. These Europeans have shown even though many of them have a antipathy for the hapless due to the goldbricks that they still believe in the pattern of almsgiving and assisting the hapless by lodging and feeding them. During this clip period. the English tried to react to the hapless by seeking to reform them. William Tucker who was an English physician. and he alternatively of giving alms ( money or nutrient ) to the ill hapless. offered to mend them ( Document 6 ) . He did this due to his POV that if you were to be healed of your disease so you could travel and happen work alternatively of traveling around imploring which to his antipathy they had become accustom to alternatively of seeking to be reformed.
The British authorities set up poorhouses which used force and famishment to reform the hapless ( Document 7 ) . The English authorities POV in these ordinances showed that they believed that through difficult labour and penalty that the hapless would lose their idling and be able to subject to the poorhouse maestro which would let them to be able to really travel and acquire an honest life due to them losing their idling. These efforts to reform the hapless show the English people’s understanding towards the hapless and their responses on how to assist the hapless. In decision. the Europeans between the 1450’s and 1700’s held many negative attitudes towards the hapless themselves and the loafers who they believed were a threat to society. Besides during this clip period the Europeans had many responses like in England where they put them in poorhouses or tried to mend them or in others topographic points where they tried to give them alms. Some of the Europeans saw the hapless as idle cadgers who were a threat to society and the hapless who really deserved alms while other believed that all the hapless deserved alms out of the kindness of their bosom which was the English tried to make through seeking to reform the hapless.
