Carl Gustav Jung Essay Research Paper Archetypes

Carl Gustav Jung Essay, Research Paper

Originals and Their Influence on the Personality: Carl Gustav Jung

Introduction

Carl Gustav Jung ( 1875-1961 ) was born on July 26, in the little small town of Kesswil on Lake Constance. He was named after his gramps, a professor of medical specialty at the University of Basel. He was the oldest kid and merely lasting boy of a Swiss Reform curate. Carl attended the University of Basel and decided to travel into the field of psychopathology after reading a book that caught his involvement.

Jung became an helper at the Burgholzli Mental infirmary, a celebrated medical infirmary in Zurich. He studied under, and was influenced by Eugen Bleuler, a celebrated head-shrinker who defined schizophrenic disorder. Jung was besides influenced by Freud, with whom he subsequently became good friends. Their relationship ended when Jung wrote a book called & # 8220 ; Symbols of Transformation. & # 8221 ; Jung disagreed with Freud & # 8217 ; s cardinal thought that a symbol is a cloaked representation of a pent-up want ( Heaney, 1994 ) . After dividing up with Freud, Jung had a 2 twelvemonth period of non-productivity, but so he came out with his & # 8220 ; Psychological Types, & # 8221 ; a celebrated work. He went on several trips to larn about crude societies and originals. His geographic expeditions included trips to Africa, New Mexico to analyze Pueblo Indians, and to India and Ceylon to analyze eastern doctrine. He studied spiritual and occult beliefs like I Ching, a Chinese method of luck stating. Alchemy became one of his involvements during his journeys. His book, & # 8220 ; Psychology and Alchemy, & # 8221 ; published in 1944, is among his most of import Hagiographas. In this survey, he told about the human head. One of his methods was word association. This is when a individual is given a series of words and asked to react to them. Abnormal response or vacillation can intend that the individual has a complex about that word. His basic belief was in complex or analytical psychological science. The end is psychosynthesis, or the fusion and distinction of the mind ( head ) . He believed that the head started out as a whole and should remain that manner. That answered structural, dynamic, developmental inquiries. Jung is best known for his theory of & # 8220 ; The three degrees of the head & # 8221 ; ( Aurelio, 1995 ) .

Discussion

The three degrees of the head theory includes the self-importance ( witting ) , personal unconscious, and corporate unconscious. The witting degree serves four maps. It is the portion of the personality that carries out normal day-to-day activities: thought, feeling, detection, and intuiting. The personal unconscious contains an single & # 8217 ; s memories, and the corporate unconscious is an unaccessible bed that contains cosmopolitan experiences. Normally, one of the two categories normally dominates, and seldom does one see an single with absolutely balanced categories of behaviour ( Nehr, 1996 ) .

Jung said that an self-importance is a filter from the senses to the witting head. All ego rejections go to the personal unconscious. The self-importance is extremely selective. Every twenty-four hours we are subjected to a huge figure of experiences, most of which do non go witting because the self-importance eliminates them before they reach consciousness. & # 8220 ; The personal unconscious Acts of the Apostless like a filing cabinet for those ego rejections & # 8221 ; ( Jurkevich, 1991, P. 58 ) . Bunchs of related ideas in the personal subconscious signifier composites. Complexs are truly suppressed feelings. Complexs are frequently extremely seeable to people, but unfelt by the person who has the composite. Complexs can be revealed by word association, which will do hang-ups if a certain word is mentioned. A strong or entire composite will rule the life of a individual, and a weak or partial composite will drive a individual in a way of it, but non excessively strongly. A complex, as Jung discovered, need non be a hinderance to a individual & # 8217 ; s accommodation. & # 8220 ; They can be and frequently are beginnings of inspiration and thrust that are indispensable for outstanding accomplishment & # 8221 ; ( Aurelio, 1995, p.351 ) .

& # 8220 ; The corporate unconscious is familial. It sets up the form of one & # 8217 ; s mind & # 8221 ; ( Kremer, 1990, p.2 ) . An familial aggregation of aboriginal

images are stored here. They are cosmopolitan dispositions that all people have in common someplace by agencies of heredity. The four of import originals that play really important functions in everyone’s personality are Persona, Anima ( us ) , Shadow, and the Self.

Persona is derived from the Latin word significance & # 8220 ; mask & # 8221 ; . In Jungian psychological science, the character original serves a similar intent ; it enables one to portray a character that is non needfully his or her ain. The character is the mask or facade one exhibits publically, with the purpose of showing a favourable feeling so that society will accept him ( Nehr, 1996 ) .

Anima and Animus is what Jung referred to as the & # 8220 ; inward face & # 8221 ; of the mind. The & # 8220 ; inward face & # 8221 ; he called the anima in males and the animosity in females. The anima original is the female side of the masculine mind ; the animosity original is the masculine side of the female mind. Man has developed his anima original by uninterrupted exposure to adult females over many coevalss, and adult female has developed her animosity original by her exposure to work forces ( Heaney, 1994 ) .

Harmonizing to Mannis ( 1997 ) , the & # 8220 ; Shadow & # 8221 ; is what Jung referred to as & # 8220 ; the negative side of the personality, the unpleasant qualities we like to conceal & # 8221 ; . When one is non witting of their & # 8220 ; shadow & # 8221 ; , they give it more power. & # 8220 ; Usually, the qualities we dislike the most in others, are the unknown qualities in our shadow & # 8221 ; ( Kremer, 1999, p.4 ) .

& # 8220 ; The ego represents all originals working together & # 8221 ; ( Heaney, 1994, p.29 ) . Jung used the words extroversion and invagination to demo how one & # 8217 ; s personality is. Those who lean towards extroversion are normally socially accepted. They are surpassing and really sociable. Those who lean towards invagination tend to maintain to themselves and are non really sociable.

One & # 8217 ; s mind works together three ways. One construction may counterbalance for the failing of another construction ( Jurkevich, 1991 ) . One constituent may oppose another constituent, and two or more constructions may unify to organize a synthesis. Compensation may be illustrated by the contrasting attitudes of extroversion and invagination. If extroversion is the dominant or superior attitude of the witting self-importance, so the unconscious will counterbalance by developing the pent-up attitude of invagination. Compensation besides occurs between map. A individual believing or experiencing in his witting head will be an intuitive, esthesis type unconsciously. This balance is healthy and it prevents our minds from going neurotically imbalanced. Resistance exists everyplace in the personality: between the character and the shadow, between the character and the anima, and between the shadow and the anima. The competition between the rational and irrational forces of the mind ne’er ceases. One & # 8217 ; s unity of & # 8220 ; self & # 8221 ; can really find whether or non this resistance will do a smashing of a personality ( Heaney, 1994 ) .

I decided to make my research on Carl Jung because he is non discussed much in the text edition. I find his theory of witting and unconscious really interesting. I believe the ideas of character and self-importance without a uncertainty. When one & # 8217 ; s self-importance is shot down, a individual can be given to develop a complex about it. I besides agree that people tend to hold a different character based on where they are at and how they are expected to move around certain people.

Mentions

Aurelio, Jeanne M. ( 1995 ) . Using Jungian originals to research deeper degrees of organisational civilization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 4, 347-369.

Heaney, Liam F. ( 1994 ) . Freud, Jung and Joyce: Conscious connexions. Contemporary Review, 265, 28-32.

Jurkevich, Gayana. ( 1991 ) . Unamuno & # 8217 ; s intrahistoria and Jung & # 8217 ; s corporate unconscious: analogues, convergences, and common. Comparative Literature, 43, 43-60.

Kremer, Jurgen W. ( 1999 ) . Confronting the corporate shadow. Revision, 22, 2-5.

Mannis, Robert F. ( 1997 ) . Jung and his shadow. Utne Reader, 84, 91-94.

Neher, Andrew. ( 1996 ) . Jung & # 8217 ; s theory of originals: a reviews. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 36, 61-92.