Carl Rogers Essay Research Paper Eventually I

Carl Rogers Essay, Research Paper

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

Finally I am traveling to briefly explicate the of import parts of these chapters because I need to take up some room and I am non rather certain about what to compose. So here is a small description of what, like it or non, this paper is traveling to incorporate. I? ll start of with my ideas and feelings about the construction and singularity of The Clinical Treatment of the Problem Child, so acquire into the existent organic structure of the book and speak about what I thought was interesting and what I think is still used today. Of class utilizing my bantam cognition about the psychological science of today and contemporary establishments and therapy. After that I am traveling to dig into Way of Life and do the same thing. The Way of Life subdivision will likely be well shorter because of my limited interested in the book and my blazing indolence. Plus we had to hold two beginnings and I decided to pick the two books that he wrote near the beginning of his calling and near the terminal.

There were a few stylistic things about the book that impressed me adequate to include them into this paper. First off, it was written in 1939 when the survey of psychological science was in its babyhood. At the terminal of every chapter or subdivision throughout the book there is a bibliography demoing every beginning that was cited. I think this is a really cagey manner to allow people cognize that there is a scientific discipline behind psychological science and it is non all unsighted speculation. I think that was really insightful and really much a smack in the face to everyone that didn? t believe in psychological science ( of class if they put no stock in psychological science they would non hold read the book, but hey he tried ) .

Foreword

? The primary intent of this volume is to depict and discourse the assortment of intervention accomplishments really used in clinical work. These? ways of pattern, ? which have been germinating over a mark of old ages, are set Forth in organized manner, in hope that their presentation will take to a better apprehension of intervention techniques and a more critical consideration of their use. ? This cat seems to truly desire to set up psychological science as a scientific discipline and I think it is orderly how easy he can at the same time compose to an audience of professionals in their field to person like me with perfectly no background in psychological science.

Factors that Influence Behavior

He mentions the Hereditary Factor, the Organic Influences, the Family, the Cultural and Social Influences, the Needs of the Organism, and the Interaction of Factors. May of the above mentioned Factors we have already discussed in category, which leads to to believe that Carl Rogers was either highly in front of his clip, or that psychological science has non advanced a great trade over the last 50 old ages. Probably a small spot of both, because Mr. Rogers states several times that he in no manner claims to hold all of the replies. ? This is non to state, of class, that such qualities for any single can be predicted by measurings of the parents, since the complex procedure of cistrons contributed by the parents insures variableness every bit good as similarity? ( pg.5 ) . Bing low is ever a fillip, particularly if you went to college for 10 old ages and cognize everything.

The Foster Home as a Means of Treatment

I can? t Tell if the writer is knocking the usage of Foster Homes or if he is knocking the grounds kids are placed into these homes but there is decidedly some irony in the manner he speaks of the Foster Home. He says? Even the head-shrinker, who more than most is disposed to depend on procedures that are internal instead than external, falls back with surprising frequence on gross alterations of environment to carry through his intent? ( pg. 63 ) . I personally think that the lone ground a kid should be put in a Foster place is if the parents are deemed unable or unworthy to raise the kid. There are much better topographic points for juvenile delinquents than a surrogate place, like a boot cantonment or gaol.

Types of Institutional Treatment

This is one country that I think has changed greatly in the past 50 old ages and yet stayed the same. The end of the establishment is a? baffled one? . ? Punishment is looked upon as about necessarily a portion of the end, intervention of the kid? s behaviour being in many instances a secondary purpose? ( pg. 109 ) . Treatment in an Institution is a gag ; there is no such thing. The lone ground that patients seem to better, or state the physician that they have been rehabilitated is so they can acquire out of the establishment. That is my sentiment of 1999 and good old Carl said, ? All to frequently the two purposes ( penalty, intervention ) are mingled so that the moralistic penalties are meted out with the idea that they will in some marvelous manner better the behaviour of the kid, in arrant neglect if everything that we have come to cognize sing the causing and intervention of behaviour? ( pg 109 ) . That material is all the same, but today the usage of Institutions and what is required to

be admitted to them is radically different, perchance due to alterations of the penal system or wider scope of illegal activities. Most Institutions now deal about entirely with drugs and intoxicant. But there are other jobs dealt with every bit good such as murderous menaces, aggression jobs, run-a-ways, and self-destruction. The book doesn? t truly say why they institutionalized people in that period of clip, but I took the Institutions of this clip period to be like gaols for kids. I wrote manner excessively much on this 1. I do believe that Institutions have changed really radically but are likely no better off.

Meanss of Changing Parental Attitudes

There are some interesting state of affairss outlined in this chapter but alternatively of copying them verbatim I a merely traveling to sum up the cool 1s and state how they are a agencies to alter parental attitudes. Direct Education was the 1 that struck me as the most simple and most logical is the 1 with? utmost restrictions? . The state of affairs is as follows, a female parent requests the aid of a psychologist for her unwieldy kid who has ne’er been to school ( she is 11 ) . The physician realizes at little more than a glimpse that the kid is a? Mongolian? and her mental development is that of a three year-old. Even after the female parent was told that there was no remedy and the kid would ne’er develop past this point the female parent insisted that the kid could read and compose. While the female parent was stating this, her kid was doing unintelligible noises, drooling, and other things that three twelvemonth olds do. She blames the kid? s province on the fact that she has ne’er been allowed to go to school, but reluctantly admits that four other psychologists have diagnosed her girl with the same status. That is more or less the state of affairs and subsequently Rogers says, ? The fact that parents may be able easy to absorb preparation for a occupation, or to educate themselves in respect to current events, or to larn a new system of contract span, does non intend that they can larn even merely factual informations when this goes contrary to their emotional demands? ( pg. 186 ) . ? This adult male is a mastermind, he merely summed my parents up in one sentence. They will non accept the fact that I don? t wear nappies any longer and invariably speak about the good old yearss when I was normal, I am acquiring older and I think this is? contrary to their emotional demands? so they don? T accept it.

The following 1s are Interpretative and Relationship therapy but how can those exceed the attractively written subdivision on Direct Education. I skimmed over them and I? thousand sure you know what they are anyways.

On to the following? beginning? , the Way of Being by Carl Rogers. This book has an interesting debut where the writer makes himself look good by speaking about all of the things that have happened in his life-time and about how he was an instrumental portion of it all thorough his books on guidance and psychotherapeutics. I think he was merely acquiring old and needed something to maintain him from acquiring senile and to go forth a farewell book that summed up his full life? s work. He says, ? This book encompasses the alterations that have taken topographic point during the past decennary? approximately, the 1970ss. It brings together diverse stuff which I have written in recent old ages ( pg. Vii ) . ? Blah, Blah, Blah?

There are four chief parts to this book and if I had the clip or the energy I would non mind reading it all. Part One deals with Personal Experiences and Positions of the writer, his? Experiences in Communication? and his? Doctrine of Interpersonal Relationships and How they Grow? refuse like that. The following subdivision, ? Aspects of a Person-Centered Approach? I thought was orderly and described a technique that I had ne’er heard of and ne’er seem used. ? The first component could be called genuineness, reality, or congruity. The more the healer is himself or herself in the relationship, seting up no professional forepart or personal fa & # 231 ; fruit drink, the greater is the likeliness that the client will alter and turn in a constructive mode? ( pg. 114 ) . This sounds cool, but in world if healers did this the calling of a healer would be drastically shortened, because I don? t think there is any manner a healer without defences could manage everyone else? s jobs all twenty-four hours every twenty-four hours. So they would hold to do a tradeoff between being a calling mediocre healer or a truly good healer for about five old ages before they become postal workers.

Sections three and four were stupid so I? ll merely go forth it at that.

In decision, Mr. Rogers did truly suit the cast of the hug-me head-shrinker that I thought he would. I don? Ts truly see why he is a humanist or maybe it? s the fact that I still truly wear? T know what a humanist is. Either manner, I think he is a reasonably reasonable individual who does non do up facts and figures and who has seemingly been in the game for a long clip. You have to esteem that, but I bet he ne’er had childs of his ain.

Categories