Greenby Mental Health Center Essay Sample

The Greenby Community Mental Health ( Greenby ) has a Center Consultation and Education Department ( C and E Department ) . and it is about to lose its support. and needs to demo the board of managers that its plan is so utile. The C and E section is utile to many persons. and helps the other plans gain clients. but the C and E Department needs to demo cogent evidence to the board that there is a connexion by demoing grounds of this. C and E section needs to use a procedure rating and an result rating. which will demo that the plans it has. does generate clients for the other plans within Greenby. The paper will demo one procedure rating step. and one result rating step that will demo the efficiency and effectivity of Greenby’s C and E Department. The paper will besides discourse challenges and issues of these steps. Process Evaluation

Harmonizing to Lewis. Packard. and Lewis the “Process rating involves measuring bureau activities to find whether plans are runing in conformity with programs and outlooks. ” ( Lewis. Packard & A ; Lewis. 2007. p. 226 ) . McDonald the executive manager of Greenby thinks cutting the C and E plan is the reply but turn outing that C and E plan is really good to Greenby it is necessary to make a formative rating will demo the achievements of the C and E plans. This procedure will do it easier to demo the achievements. and compare them to the aims demoing what services have been provided. It will demo who did what and how these services were provided. When a proper rating is done the information that has been collected can be shown to the board to demo precisely what kinds of advancement the C and E section really has. It will demo how the plan works the assets. and objectives. This will guarantee that the plan is working and traveling in the right way. It can efficaciously demo the costs and disbursals the plans have. C and E needs to demo precisely what each plan in the section is making and why. and how it is supplying these services by demoing a list of plans and what aim that each one has. Show how each plan is connected to the community. and even demo past participants to the plan. and whatever grounds these persons had or have for being in the different plans. Outcome Evaluation

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

The result rating is to supply the consequences of each plans success. and the consequences of what happens with the clients. and how it connects to the other sections in Greenby. “Outcomes evaluation expressions at impacts/benefits/changes to [ the ] clients ( as a consequence of the plan ( s ) attempts ) during and/or after their engagement in [ the ] programs” ( McNamara. n. d. . p. 1 ) . and even the community. such as the schools plans. By demoing the connexion from the community and the people that are coming from these different plans to the other sections will demo the stakeholders merely how valuable this section is.

By utilizing a logical theoretical account the C and E section can demo the board precisely this. and executing a satisfaction study with the staff and clients this will demo how much the community really depends on the C and E section. and the plans that it offers. Some illustrations of what can be a consequence in an result rating can be things such as households that come in to make a household oriented workshop. and discover while in this plan that the issues that the household unit is holding is demand of household reding non a short-run plan. Then another illustration would be a individual female parent holding disciplinary issues with a kid finds support and replies in a parenting category. and short-run plan is all she needs. The importance here is to demo what impacts the clients. groups. and what the terminal consequences of the plan have on each one. Challenges and Issues

The challenges and issues that the C and E may hold is turn outing that these worships. and plans are indispensable for the clients that the Greenby terminal receiving as an terminal consequence of what C and E provide. Harmonizing to Lewis. Packard. and Lewis ( 2007 ) . some of these challenges will be the “ ability to fulfill multiple stakeholders. ability to last and turn by accommodating and geting resources. inclusion of internal procedures such as effectual direction systems. and attending to human dealingss considerations including occupation satisfaction and organisational culture” ( p. 240 ) . Another challenge is if the ratings have any negative consequences the community. which can ensue in losing clients. and Greenby board of managers will see this and could utilize this to stop the plan. It is a hazard worth taking particularly if it is does more good than bad so the community could go involved in trying to salvage the C and E section because of the aid it does make within the community. Decision

An rating on the program’s provided by C and E section will supply consequences that will demo the Greenby board of managers merely how valuable this section can be to its organisation. A decently done rating can demo the consequences of how the C and E section affect the community. and the lives of the clients that receive referrals to other sections within Greenby. By utilizing the evaluation’s C and E section can demo the procedure. results. and the efficiency. and effectivity that the section has as a whole. It is possible that with this information it is higher plausibleness that the board will prefer in the way of maintaining the C and E section. It is a hazard worth taking particularly if it is does more good than bad so the community could go involved in trying to salvage the C and E section because of the aid it does make within the community.


Lewis. J. A. . Packard. T. R. . & A ; Lewis. M. D. ( 2007 ) . Management of human service plans ( 4th ed. ) . Belmont. Calcium: Thomson Learning. – Cengage Carter McNamara. MBA. PhD. ( n. d. ) Authenticity Consulting. LLC. . Basic Guide to Outcome-Based Evaluation for Nonprofit Organizations with really Limited Resources. retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //managementhelp. org/evaluation/outcomes-evaluation-guide. htm