The Line Item Veto Essay Research Paper

The Line Item Veto Essay, Research Paper

The Line Item Veto

President Clinton signed into jurisprudence the Line point veto act

of 1996, on April 9,1996. The Impoundment Control Act were

amended by adding at the terminal a new portion on line point veto. The

subdivision added to the ICA is named the Public Laws 104-130. The

Line Item Veto was added to the powers of the president on

January 1, 1997. The power of the Line Item veto will so be

Terminated on the sundown of December 31, 2004.

Previously the fundamental law allowed the president merely

to either agree and accept a whole measure or cull or veto the

whole thing. Now, the Line Item Veto gives the president

conditional powers to call off, or line points of certain parts

of the measure which he disagrees with. The President nevertheless,

can non merely traverse out any portion of a measure he doesn? Ts like with ;

he can merely call off something under certain fortunes.

He has to supply Congress with ground for the cancellation

and he besides has to see old legislative histories and

information referenced in jurisprudence. These cancellations are so

considered by Congress and the senate budget commissions. If

they do non give back a disapproval measure to the president, it

agencies that they have agreed with the cancellations of

certain parts of the measure. If they do give a disapproval measure back

to the president the cancellations are now null.

The line-item veto jurisprudence & # 8217 ; s purpose is to cut down the shortage

and excesss. Congress and the president claim that by utilizing

the Line Item Veto method that the federal authorities will

salvage $ 569 million over 5 old ages.

The line point veto has been argued and debated upon in

many instances. One statement started the twenty-four hours after the Line point

Veto act went into consequence. This instance was Raines vs. Byrd, it

dealt with the constitutionality of the line point veto. The instance

was dismissed because the tribunal felt that they did non hold a

proper? standing? .

Another instance in which the Line Item Veto was argued

upon was when NY sued. The Line Item veto had caused

NY to lose a proviso that would cut down the province of New

York & # 8217 ; s disbursement on the Medicaid wellness attention plan for the

hapless.

Congress feels that the Line Item Veto will assist out the

shortage the authorities is holding right now, and do non believe

that it is a displacement of power like others think. The congressional

budget office has projected an $ 8 billion excess for financial

1998.

Another incidence in which the president has once more used

his power of the line point veto was on military building.

The measure spends money on the bettering National Guard and

Reserve Centers, barrack building and more. However,

the money spent on all of this building is considered to be

a really big

sum of money and as Rahm Emmanuel, senior

disposal functionary, said, ? a blow to the position quo in this

state? . Besides, after the houses debated this issue utilizing the

line point veto process, 129 undertakings that the Pentagon did

non desire, was added on the list of undertakings.

I personally do non hold with the Line Item veto for

many grounds. One of them is that it gives excessively much power to

the President. At first glimpse, it seems as if when the

president gives in a list of lined points to the Congress that he

does non hold with, that it goes through a vigorous procedure

before they are really considered to be canceled. This is

untrue. While Congress may compose a disapproval measure to the

president trying to invalidate the presidents actions, the

president can still really easy acquire his manner. All he has to make is

acquire support from either 1/3 of the house of rep. ? s or the

senate to blackball the disapproval measure. There is a really large opportunity

that the president can beat up up 33 % of one or the other house

and as you see he will acquire whatever he wants.

Another ground why I do non hold with the Line Item

Veto is because is because in the instance that a forceful

president like, Richard Nixon came along with the power of

the Line Item Veto the power may be misused. For illustration ; the

president could utilize the veto as blackmail to coerce person to

support a presidential place.

Something else which besides confuses me about the

constitutionality and whole place on the Line point veto is

why it was non made an amendment. I would anticipate something

that large, and the great displacement of power to do a alteration in the

fundamental law, nevertheless it didn? T ; it was considered a alteration in

the legislative act.

The? lock-box? which is kept to see that any nest eggs

from cancellations go toward shortage decrease can besides be

harmful. Although this is said to maintain the money secure, one time

one million millions start stacking up in their, Congress and the President

would happen some impulse to travel pass in on something. This

wouldn? T be excessively harmful if what they were passing the money

on was a good cause, but this defeats the whole intent of

the? Lock-Box? .

The military building incidence, the? lock-box?

grounds and the inordinate sum of power given to the

president are merely a few grounds I disagree with the Line Item

Veto. I hope you have seen how this new method is truly making

no aid to our budget and is giving more power to our

president and the 1s to come. The whole ground why we are

now non under the control of Britain is because Britain was

regulating us under a gov? T which gave excessively much regulation to one

individual or group of people, and to hold the Line Item Veto

method in our state is beliing everything we stand

for.