The Whiskey Rebellion Essay Research Paper The

The Whiskey Rebellion Essay, Research Paper

The Whiskey Rebellion

Mike Klenosky

11/24/96

AP History per. 4

Ms. Valentino

On August 1, 1794, President George Washington was one time once more taking

military personnels. Merely this clip Washington was non striking out against the British but

instead against fellow Americans. The juncture for this was the Whiskey Rebellion.

Assorted attempts had been made to decrease the het resistance towards the revenue enhancement

on distilled spiritss. However, there was merely one adult male who has derived the best

class of action. That adult male, President George Washington, deserves all the recognition

and acknowledgment for his actions refering the Whiskey Rebellion.

In September 1791 the western counties of Pennsylvania broke out in

rebellion against a federal? strike? revenue enhancement on the distillment of spirits. After

local and federal functionaries were attacked, President Washington and his advisers

decided to direct military personnels to pacify the part. On August 14, 1792, under the

reserves jurisprudence, Henry Knox ( secretary of war ) had called for 12,950 military personnels. After

this, many jobs arose, both political and logistical. These quandaries had to

be overcome, and by October, 1794 the work forces were on the March towards Harrisburg,

Pennsylvania. There, they contained the rabble craze and choler. This event

represented the first usage of the Militia Law of 1792 enabling the reserves to?

put to death the Torahs of the brotherhood, and suppress rebellion? ( The Whiskey Rebellion

of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 1 ) .

It is clear that George Washington was the beginning of success in the

Whiskey Rebellion. When the reserves, with Washington and Hamilton at its lead,

reached western Pennsylvania, it became clear that there would be no armed

opposition. Evidence of Washington & # 8217 ; s leading in this rebellion took topographic point

when the? Representatives of the insurrectionists asked for mildness, and Washington

granted it with judicial admission that they comply with federal Torahs thenceforth? ( The

Precipice of Power ) . This understanding forced the populace to stay by the regulations of

the authorities and their revenue enhancements without any destructive rebellions. It was

evident that Alexander Hamilton was non the anchor of this success. ? His

actions provided undeniable cogent evidence to Republicans that Hamilton was a monster who

would halt at nil to support his corrupt policies, a budding Caesar set on

set uping monarchy? ( A Biography of Alexander Hamilton ) . Hamilton did non

attention as much about the success of his authorities but of himself and his beliefs

on the state. Furthermore, Hamilton was be aftering on vacating, therefore doing it

important to him to intrench the policies he had put into topographic point. ? For the

balance of his life Hamilton worried that his work would be destroyed, his

system dismantled, under the resistance? ( The Precipice of Power ) .

President George Washington played a cardinal function in the resistance between

the rabble and the reserves. He deserves the recognition for making and keeping

peace among the people, and transporting out the mission without one shooting fired.

Hamilton, on the other manus, put his involvements in front of the job at undertaking,

hence, coercing Washington to come up with a logical solution. Had it non been

for Washington & # 8217 ; s bravery and kindness, the reserves might good hold followed the

lead of the Gallic Rebels, and destroyed the state.